cymbaldiva
Active Member
A favourite of my old drill NCO.![]()
Yeah, my fiancee is ex-military - I got that one from him :animwink:
A favourite of my old drill NCO.![]()
I'm just amazed that Disney has not implemented RFID into the wristbands. They could give you a nice plastic wristband, like a cheap watch wristband, when you arrive at your resort. Now, if you forget it at the hotel, just go to guest services and show your Key to the World and get another. If you lose both IDs, you would use your driver's license or state ID just like usual to get issued a new key and also the wristband. Ah, maybe even a $2.50 penalty for replacement. But, here is how they could be used:
You know, you had me until that last little bit...
Lack of planning/preparedness on anyone's part does not constitute an emergency on mine or anyone elses. While I haven't been to Disney in 7 years, the shops were open before closing the last time I was there, so I'm fairly certain they still are now allowing plenty of shopping time for all. Please don't lay guilt out on me for choices made by other guests.
Lack of planning/preparedness on anyone's part does not constitute an emergency on mine or anyone elses. While I haven't been to Disney in 7 years, the shops were open before closing the last time I was there, so I'm fairly certain they still are now allowing plenty of shopping time for all. Please don't lay guilt out on me for choices made by other guests.
Staying off Disney property should not make you a second-class park guest.
2) Stay off-property and don't complain when you are not entitled to Disney Resort benefits.
I don't think people are necessarily being snobby about the whole EMH thing. One of the perks Disney advertises for 'WDW Resort Guests' is EMH's. This refers to people who are staying in the WDW resort hotels on property. This is offered as an incentive to spend what it takes to stay on their property in their hotels. It's not that WDW hotel guests think that others who love Disney but stay off-property for various reasons are not as good as they are or less dedicated to the Disney-experience because they aren't spending the money to stay in the WDW resort hotels. Disney advertises this particular perk for the guests at their hotels and most people like to get what they are paying for. I know I do. Non-WDW-resort-guests shouldn't take this personally. It's not intended that way. If EMH's were for anyone who paid admission to be in the park(s) they wouldn't be EMH's. They'd just be later/limited operating hours.
Also, in reference to the notion that it shouldn't be a big deal for non-WDW-resort-guests to stay in the parks just to partake of the atmosphere/shop/dine during EMH's, I disagree with that as well. Again, it goes back to the fact that Disney has advertised to their resort/hotel guests that the EMH's are special for them only. If you crowd in extra people that are not resort/hotel guests then it takes away that exclusivity that has been advertised. The shops, restaurants, and park(s) are more crowded. The perk is aimed at less crowds. It does detract from the perk as a whole.
I wish there were an easy solution for people like DisneyWales who travel long distances but have circumstances that don't make it sensible for them to stay on the property and partake of EMH's. I guess one of those solutions would be what seems to be the ongoing effort to add some extra magic by having Pirate & Princess Parties, MNSSHP, MVMCP, etc. As much as admissions are to these parties it may be more reasonable to just get a single night stay in a value resort utilizing some of the discounts that float out there even if you aren't staying so that now you are legitimate in staying for EMH's.
Personally, I'm glad that Disney is making an effort to keep the EMH's for their hotel guests. That's one of the things I feel like I pay for in staying there. The reason I feel that way is because that's what Disney advertises. In all the years we've been, I didn't even realize that non-resort guests stayed because I thought it would be pointless for them. In addition to the check-points I think it would also help to check wristbands at the cash registers in the shops or at the check-in booths at the sit-down restaurants. Let wristband-less people make purchases in shops and counter-service eateries for perhaps 1/2 hour after official park closing in limited locations closest to the park entrances (ie. Main St. or Mouse Gear) and then stop. Let wristband-less people check-in for dining reservations at the podiums at the restaurants until park closing and stop. That along with the check-points could get the job done.
But please, don't think that I feel like I'm better than someone else because I'm a WDW hotel guest. I just feel like Disney has advertised this perk, I bought the perk, and I should receive the perk. That's all.
EMH starts right at closing time, so the fact that guests are still in the stores 1.5-2 hours into an EMH is NO different than any other normal night at a park.
Since when was being able to shop and/or eat for an hour or so after park closing a resort guest benefit? Last time I checked, Disney had no rule barring non-resort guests from shops and restaurants.
You must be my long lost cousin![]()
LOL Main Street stays open 30 minutes (give or take) after the official park closing so please don't say 1.5-2 hours
It kinda should. If Disney is to be a true "resort", there needs to be privileges that are strictly for "resort" guests, and these "resort" guests should not be inconvenienced by those who have made the choice not to be "resort" guests.
With the ability to score a Disney resort room for as little at $70 a night, I don't see much point in the argument that there are some people who cannot afford a Disney hotel and so they should not be penalized due to their circumstances. You can't get a room at the Holiday Inn by my house in upstate NY for less than $100.
In my mind, you have three options:
1) Save up for a Disney hotel and enjoy the benefits.
2) Stay off-property and don't complain when you are not entitled to Disney Resort benefits.
3) Go somewhere else on vacation.
It kinda should. If Disney is to be a true "resort", there needs to be privileges that are strictly for "resort" guests, and these "resort" guests should not be inconvenienced by those who have made the choice not to be "resort" guests.
With the ability to score a Disney resort room for as little at $70 a night, I don't see much point in the argument that there are some people who cannot afford a Disney hotel and so they should not be penalized due to their circumstances. You can't get a room at the Holiday Inn by my house in upstate NY for less than $100.
In my mind, you have three options:
1) Save up for a Disney hotel and enjoy the benefits.
2) Stay off-property and don't complain when you are not entitled to Disney Resort benefits.
3) Go somewhere else on vacation.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.