Disney Irish
Premium Member
Dunno, I think he is still unproven and can't be trusted. /sI think it has zero chance of bombing and based on James Cameron‘s track record I don’t think he needs to hire anybody else. He’s doing just fine.
Dunno, I think he is still unproven and can't be trusted. /sI think it has zero chance of bombing and based on James Cameron‘s track record I don’t think he needs to hire anybody else. He’s doing just fine.
Well he did make Piranha 2: The Spawning.Dunno, I think he is still unproven and can't be trusted. /s![]()
Ever since Titanic, his movies have needed an editor. His movies before where very tight and full of story. How many times did they run up and down a sinking ship? They even did it again in Avatar 2.I think it has zero chance of bombing and based on James Cameron‘s track record I don’t think he needs to hire anybody else. He’s doing just fine.
What would you have them do just stand there? Its a sinking ship where the main cast is trying to escape. Of course they are going to being running around the ship trying to get to safety.Ever since Titanic, his movies have needed an editor. His movies before where very tight and full of story. How many times did they run up and down a sinking ship? They even did it again in Avatar 2.
I agree this one’s safe, it’ll be interesting to see how it holds up by movie 5 though, it sounds strange to say the second “only” made $2.3 billion but that’s a massive drop from the $2.9 billion the first movie made, it’ll be interesting to see if this one can break $2 billion, if it can’t this may be the first time (I can think of) that a non Hollywood movie topped the box office charts. I won’t be surprised if it ends up closer to $1.5 billion than $2 billion, still a phenomenal success, just goes to show what an anomaly the first was.I'll take "Things That Won't Happen" for $100 Alex....
Nah, Titanic is a perfectly paced film.Ever since Titanic, his movies have needed an editor. His movies before where very tight and full of story. How many times did they run up and down a sinking ship? They even did it again in Avatar 2.
I have no doubt none will get the same or exceed the first, but a ~20% drop between the first and second doesn't really seem like a lot to me when you're talking about a sequel. Had it dropped more like a normal sequel it would be closer to 30-40%, especially for a $Billion movie.I agree this one’s safe, it’ll be interesting to see how it holds up by movie 5 though, it sounds strange to say the second “only” made $2.3 billion but that’s a massive drop from the $2.9 billion the first movie made, it’ll be interesting to see if this one can break $2 billion, if it can’t this may be the first time (I can think of) that a non Hollywood movie topped the box office charts. I won’t be surprised if it ends up closer to $1.5 billion than $2 billion, still a phenomenal success, just goes to show what an anomaly the first was.
So IMAX 3D or Dolby 3D? For Way of Water I ended up seeing it in the exact theatre that Cameron watched it before it was released nationwide. And that was in Dolby 3D.
That entire category made no sense:What a feat…. Avatar has a Golden Globe nomination for box office achievement despite not being released to the box office yet…![]()
goldenglobes.com
To be eligible for the cinematic and box office achievement award, a movie only needs to make $150 million at the worldwide box office, including at least $100 million in North America, "and/or obtain commensurate digital streaming viewership." Therefore, "Fire and Ash" could theoretically gross more than $2 billion less than its predecessor and still qualify.
YouTuber and movie pundit Robert Meyer Burnett has seen Avatar and said the High Frame Rate looks fantastic…. He says he believes the difference is the use of the format is not on anything real…of course we will find out in the next week or soAnd I think it looks like crap most of the time, and causes some people to become nauseous. Hopefully neither will happen here.
Really he needs to stop with the gimmick “format” stuff and just produce good movies.
Hopefully it does look good, but that still likely won’t prevent some from getting nauseous. As the high frame rate is jarring for many people’s eyes.YouTuber and movie pundit Robert Meyer Burnett has seen Avatar and said the High Frame Rate looks fantastic…. He says he believes the difference is the use of the format is not on anything real…of course we will find out in the next week or so
I remember reading Roger Ebert's comments about 48fps cameras many years ago and how impressive and clear the images and movement were. I think Cameron has done well with it so far so I believe it does look good.YouTuber and movie pundit Robert Meyer Burnett has seen Avatar and said the High Frame Rate looks fantastic…. He says he believes the difference is the use of the format is not on anything real…of course we will find out in the next week or so
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.