• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
They definitely need that sweet spot. There needs to be a 3-five year where they can make something good without relying on it, and get that at least hope for Avengers level or better interest than now.

But not wait too long before it becomes Westerns, because right now, they are going to milk it until it becomes this generation's westerns.
I think we’re there

I get the instinctive flood to go safe in Hollywood and create volume…but the supes are definitely out of control.

They’ve redone Batman twice since Nolan…and both have been terrible trying for a “new audience” (hint)

This stuff is way exploited. What variant of xmen are we on now?
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member

Disney Irish

Premium Member
🤷🏻‍♂️

Be careful with quick interpretations of the test screenings.

 

DKampy

Well-Known Member
It’s a franchise that never performs up to task and some kinda gunnsian/incredibles mid century mod look…

We’ll see how it does. Not optimistic…but not definitive. I have been on a heater with my predictions this year so far. Think it’s gonna be a bad summer for the ole mouse
I am not sure how Fantastic Four will perform… I suspect at minimum better then Thunderbolts… as their more well known and seem to have more buzz

I am not a Marvel fanboy…. I just like good movies no matter the genre…. Thunderbolts was my most anticipated comic book movie of 2025….as it look to be something different and it satisfied… I am interested in Fantastic Four as the 60’s idealistic future setting appears to be something different in today’s superhero climate… plus anything with Pedro Pascal has my interest
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
Be careful with quick interpretations of the test screenings.

OP said there were reports the screenings were excellent. This is was the only story I had seen about the early response, and Sneider cited multiple sources (not just some dude yelling “mid”)
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I am not sure how Fantastic Four will perform… I suspect at minimum better then Thunderbolts… as their more well known and seem to have more buzz

I am not a Marvel fanboy…. I just like good movies no matter the genre…. Thunderbolts was my most anticipated comic book movie of 2025….as it look to be something different and it satisfied… I am interested in Fantastic Four as the 60’s idealistic future setting appears to be something different in today’s superhero climate… plus anything with Pedro Pascal has my interest
It will do better than that

Thunderbolts flopped…”ratings” be damned

I’m guessing FF somewhere in the $525-$600 range.

Which is meh for marvel…no matter how much shorter we try to move the goalposts in here
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Be careful with quick interpretations of the test screenings.

Grain of salt…for sure.

But fantastic four is always a tough sell anyway. I compared it to “the muppets of marvel”…and I’ll stick to it
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
OP said there were reports the screenings were excellent. This is was the only story I had seen about the early response, and Sneider cited multiple sources (not just some dude yelling “mid”)
I trust Sneider about as far as I can throw him, as he usually quotes people who claim to be "insiders" but aren't directly tied to what he is reporting on, ie in this case they haven't even seen the movie (which your article even stated). If you read the article I posted the early screening "source" appears to be from one guy and it was stuff taken out of context. And that many people at the screening polled said it was excellent according to this same source. The people who were more critical appear to be more hardcore comic fans, so of course they are going to be critical. That doesn't mean it was a "mess" or anything else that Sneider and those others claimed the "source" said, as the person who actually saw it refuted that claim.

Basically take these quick reactions with a huge truck load of salt.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Grain of salt…for sure.

But fantastic four is always a tough sell anyway. I compared it to “the muppets of marvel”…and I’ll stick to it
It remains to be seen how this iteration will do. I don't automatically subscribe to the thought that F4 can't be accepted by the masses or are past their prime. Just like everything its execution not necessarily the material that is the tough sell.
 

DKampy

Well-Known Member
OP said there were reports the screenings were excellent. This is was the only story I had seen about the early response, and Sneider cited multiple sources (not just some dude yelling “mid”)
I guess call them rumors… but I have heard them…. Not saying they are accurate…. I actually don’t put much faith either way…. I have seen quite a few so called early screenings that turned out false…. Just reporting what I heard… as I stated in my original post we won’t know until it hits theaters
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 4 Superman cost an alleged $225M. May need to get to around $700M+ to break even at the box office.


Man of Steel made $670 million worldwide in 2013, which I believed WB considered a disappointment at the time

That movie also had a $225 million production budget

$225 million is actually less than the $270 million budget of Superman Returns, and that's not adjusting for 20 years of inflation!
 

Nevermore525

Well-Known Member
Man of Steel made $670 million worldwide in 2013, which I believed WB considered a disappointment at the time

That movie also had a $225 million production budget

$225 million is actually less than the $270 million budget of Superman Returns, and that's not adjusting for 20 years of inflation!
Well, guess we’ll see what James Gunn’s latest Team Up Super Hero Movie that happens to feature Superman can do.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Man of Steel made $670 million worldwide in 2013, which I believed WB considered a disappointment at the time

That movie also had a $225 million production budget

$225 million is actually less than the $270 million budget of Superman Returns, and that's not adjusting for 20 years of inflation!
Yes, but that was the start of the DCEU and before all the troubles it had later on, especially with the SnyderBros and the #SnyderCut and all that drama. And not to mention now the third time rebooting the property on the large screen in the last 2 decades. And that doesn't even talk about the 2 other depictions of the character on TV during the same time, both of which we're beloved by fans.

In my opinion DC is in worse off shape than the MCU. And watching all the recent trailers I don't see them making any changes to make it better. For example when has Superman ever yelled at Lois in either the comics, on TV, or any previous movie as is shown in the latest trailers? He hasn't until Gunn got his hands on him and that doesn't bode well for the rest of the film to me. Not to mention the suit looks baggy on him and doesn't show him being all the muscular. So a bunch of negatives to me that general audiences won't like, but I guess we'll see.

Point is I think if they got $670M today they'd consider that a success, even if it didn't actually breakeven, given where the franchise has been the last decade.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
In the sake of fairness, break even would be more like 560.

It’ll be one to watch closely. If it doesn’t land then I think we’ve reached the clear end of theatrical DCEU. I guess another crack at Batman?

Marvel has room to fall still. There’s still going to be demand for Spiderman, Deadpool, RDJ and the OG Avengers and maybe some iteration of X Men.
 

DKampy

Well-Known Member
Yes, but that was the start of the DCEU and before all the troubles it had later on, especially with the SnyderBros and the #SnyderCut and all that drama. And not to mention now the third time rebooting the property on the large screen in the last 2 decades. And that doesn't even talk about the 2 other depictions of the character on TV during the same time, both of which we're beloved by fans.

In my opinion DC is in worse off shape than the MCU. And watching all the recent trailers I don't see them making any changes to make it better. For example when has Superman ever yelled at Lois in either the comics, on TV, or any previous movie as is shown in the latest trailers? He hasn't until Gunn got his hands on him and that doesn't bode well for the rest of the film to me. Not to mention the suit looks baggy on him and doesn't show him being all the muscular. So a bunch of negatives to me that general audiences won't like, but I guess we'll see.

Point is I think if they got $670M today they'd consider that a success, even if it didn't actually breakeven, given where the franchise has been the last decade.
There is definitely more pressure on Superman than F4…. As bad as some of the Marvel movies have been… they don’t come close to the stink of Shazam, Black Adam, The Aquaman sequel etc IMO…. In a sense DC is in a similar shape as Marvel…. As both it is more important to change the narrative then breaking the bank with profits… the only difference is if Superman fails Gunn’s DCEU is in jeopardy…where as Marvel still has some characters they can fall back on
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
I’ll log that expectations for Superman and Fantastic 4 are pretty similar. Even if the wheels don’t come off the MCU entirely in the same fashion.

600-700+ and they are pretty happy with solid franchise starters. 500 is workable but disappointing. 400 and they are at risk of being dumped for a decade. I can’t imagine either crashes and burns below 400.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom