Disney Irish
Premium Member
Thunderbolts* (New Avengers) continues to outpace Cap4 domestically and should hopefully overtake it sometime next week, maybe even this weekend.
How’s chronic excuses making from a strawmen assembly line?Intentional misunderstanding is always super clever around these parts. The likes will be sure to roll in.
Now it’s got some legs…they’re gonna “push through” and only post a $20-30 mil loss at the BOThunderbolts* (New Avengers) continues to outpace Cap4 domestically and should hopefully overtake it sometime next week, maybe even this weekend.
Every single time something doesn’t rack up $500 worldwide in the first 3 weeks…the same routine startsExactly. We don’t purport to know anything. Anything about costs, anything about revenue. Just a stab on the end.
It’s a very difficult leap of logic and I understand why it’s hard to break through. A lot of people are really stuck thinking 1.5X a production budget is what total costs are and that’s the first major fallacy. We know it’s multiples.
I thought some of the deadline sheets would break through; but here we are. I think justifying it really just makes it worse. Trying to explain it just makes it worse. At the end of the day we have three to four pieces of info - production budgets, box office, deadline sheets, financial studio outcomes. The rest is just… hard to break through and the other 90% obstinance.
Now it’s got some legs…they’re gonna “push through” and only post a $20-30 mil loss at the BO
Phantom D+ profits again?If it continues to outpace as it has that may not actually be a loss at the BO, but we'll see. Even if its a slight loss its not the end of the line for the movie, but I know you don't like to talk about that so we'll just leave it there.
Maybe it’s because when a Disney movie becomes an obvious blockbuster…. Certain posters get very quiet…. But then pipe up when there is a narrative to spin Disney as a failing brand…. And that narrative is corrected by othersEvery single time something doesn’t rack up $500 worldwide in the first 3 weeks…the same routine starts
The budget and costs becomes “negotiated down” and we question what the money making point is…I guess that becomes a warm glass of milk before bedtime?
But in the end…just more wheel spinning. This one is not worth doing the whole charade again.
Hell…it was done with Mufasa when that looked like a loser early…then two months later it was “just kidding…PSYCH!…I knew all along Disney wins!!!”
Nobody questioned the marketing costs, budget, and profitability of IO2…because the excuse engine got the day off. When this starts…the wash is objectively it’s not doing well.
Lather, rinse
You know there is a whole world of profits for a movie post-theatrical beyond just D+ right? Like digital/dvd, PVOD, airlines/hotels, other streaming services, and finally cable (for example TNT still paying a lot of have all the rights to the MCU movies including new releases). And then last on that list is D+ which yes does bring in money for a movie.Phantom D+ profits again?
The comp is cap 4…which is a loss
No point dancing here on prom night for the 1,000th time
So you mean that Disney actually is ok with and expects a movie to lose money during theatrical, hmm, that counters what several posters claim Disney is thinking.Quoting this directly from Disney's financial report:
The Company incurs significant marketing and advertising costs before and throughout the theatrical release of a film in an effort to generate public awareness of the film, to increase the public’s intent to view the film and to help generate consumer interest in the subsequent home entertainment and other ancillary markets. These costs are expensed as incurred, which may result in a loss on a film in the theatrical markets, including in periods prior to the theatrical release of the film.
I’m just trying to find some way to break through to you that a movie isn’t:
(Box Office - Production + inaccurate stab at marketing).
You can’t keep sticking to something that has yet to produce a result we can verify.
(60/40 splits of Box office -(2.5*budget)/2
No assumption about marketing, because marketing is highly elastic to performance.
Which is just silly because saying that Snow White has essentially lost as much as The Marvels did in 2023 (which this formula indeed shows) is bad. The next two worst movies from the past 2.5 years lost about $100m less than each of those did.
But it's also true that Disney is pretty especially positioned to be able to absorb those kinds of failures. They've been doing it for decades.
I've tried to find some industry source online that says marketing is now only 25% of production, but I can't.
Okay gang, before we kick this weekend into party mode...
Feel free to reshare your numbers for these 4 BOMBS!!!!1! so we can see what the difference looks like. Maybe then you could see why this is better, even though it hurts your brain to try to bend it to something that feels real to you.
Thunderbolts looks to be keeping its 4,330 theaters this weekend, and Snow White looks to be keeping her 1,300 theaters as well.
How’s chronic excuses making from a strawmen assembly line?
Nobody questioned the marketing costs, budget, and profitability of IO2…because the excuse engine got the day off. When this starts…the wash is objectively it’s not doing well.
Inside Out 2: Production $200, Marketing $50, Domestic $350, Overseas $328 = $428 Million Profit & Counting
What were you “correcting”? Budgetary estimates? Those aren’t hard numbers…and again…nobody questions them on the successful moviesUnfortunately for you, I’m nothing if not consistent. Here I am correcting IO2 in real time. You probably forget because five of you pulled a disappearing act shortly after.
Better check the scoreboard againYou'd have to tell me. Because the fallacies in this thread? They ain't comin' from me.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.