Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I see your point, but this info seems plausible. Since it came from the Former Walt Disney World resort Vice President Dan Cockerell. I don't see why he would want to lie.

Plus Kennedy seems like a glory hound, who wants to put herself on the Star Wars mt rushmore. She just doesn't realize she's a complete moron and all her ideas stink.
Kennedy is a Hollywood logistics person…and an excellent one at that

But she got lined up for failure here

Steve’s best friend hired her to be “his girl” and then sold to Disney…iger gave her kinda a mythical “power seat” to attempt to block against the first…

She was expected to serve two masters and has succeeded in serving none with a fan base you best not cross
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I think posters are using different meanings for nostalgia. One dictionary definition is "a sentimental longing or wistful affection for the past, typically for a period or place with happy personal associations." Another is "a wistful or excessively sentimental yearning for return to or of some past" time.

The "past" part is important, as well as some type of constancy. Seeing movies based on characters that one's parents loved or going to parks once in a lifetime because they're unaffordable now - this is not a recipe for future nostalgia.
I think with Gen X that’s a very complicated issue with “nostalgia”

They want both the IP nostalgia…because they were the first grow up with mega entertainment franchises with product saturation…and 1975-1995 was the most stable society - at least in the west - of the entire century. So dull it was almost boring and people really want that “nostalgia”

Disney is at the intersection of those…as are its franchises
 

DKampy

Well-Known Member
So we went to the movies today… saw Sinners(good movie)….Anyway… we did not go to our normal theater as the times did not work out for schedule…. We did not visit any of the other theaters we frequent on occasion…. This was a completely new theater to us…. It is independently owned… but it is not an art house theater… it is a multiplex with 10 screens…. The theater itself felt like we entered a time warp…. I don’t know if they have done any renovations since the 1980’s…. When we enter the theater it was completely dark… I had to use my phone light to find our seat(despite no other newish updates… they still required seat reservations) then our movie started promptly at it’s scheduled time…. No trailers or advertisements at all…. I don’t know if I ever experienced that… it was a bit of a bizarre feeling… even in my youth in the 80’s they would display trivia questions on screen… good thing we arrived on time
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
That’s a valid point. And I agree the generational domination of Disney is waning. But I’d say X is the last “full in” gen…they just don’t admit it.

Are you talking about Star Wars here or Disney as a whole?

Yes, that's why I was talking about the children of the millennials.

What you are describing is liking or enjoying IP, which is different from nostalgia.
I’m adding what I said in another thread to more fully explain what I mean.

Are you actually referring to Gen Z or Gen Alpha here?

I disagree that children of Millenials are a waning downtrend, I actually think they are more indoctrinated into Disney. You reap what you sew. Gen Z is the one with really poor touchpoint to Disney. They are the byproduct of the 2000's output with some Cars thrown in for good measure. Plus are an echo of their by and large Gen X parents who weren't raised on home video and the animated Renaissance films.

Gen Alpha are the ones being raised on Frozen, Moana, Coco, Inside Out and Encanto with the sudden home access via D+ (that has a lot of echos of the VHS wave). It's too early to make calls on Gen Alpha. But my anecdotal experience is they don't have a lack of connection to Frozen and Moana.
 

Chi84

Premium Member
Are you talking about Star Wars here or Disney as a whole?




Are you actually referring to Gen Z or Gen Alpha here?

I disagree that children of Millenials are a waning downtrend, I actually think they are more indoctrinated into Disney. You reap what you sew. Gen Z is the one with really poor touchpoint to Disney. They are the byproduct of the 2000's output with some Cars thrown in for good measure. Plus are an echo of their by and large Gen X parents who weren't raised on home video and the animated Renaissance films.

Gen Alpha are the ones being raised on Frozen, Moana, Coco, Inside Out and Encanto with the sudden home access via D+ (that has a lot of echos of the VHS wave). It's too early to make calls on Gen Alpha. But my anecdotal experience is they don't have a lack of connection to Frozen and Moana.
They’re familiar with the IP but I’m talking about them being nostalgic for that IP when they’re adults. I don’t see that happening because there is so much more content out there competing for their interest.

My kids are millennials and have some nostalgia for Disney, mainly because we took annual trips to WDW. I don’t see that happening now because of the cost.
 

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
Agreed, I think they care more than some around here like to admit.
But revenge of the sith is not Disney star wars. People still care about lucas star wars, that's what selling. A lot of fans have given up on Disney Star wars. They just don't get hyped at all for what Disney is doing. Do I think star wars can't come back? Absolutely not. I just don't see it happening under current management. I think Mando and Grogu will be a big tell to see where star wars is at currently.
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
I disagree that children of Millenials are a waning downtrend, I actually think they are more indoctrinated into Disney. You reap what you sew. Gen Z is the one with really poor touchpoint to Disney. They are the byproduct of the 2000's output with some Cars thrown in for good measure. Plus are an echo of their by and large Gen X parents who weren't raised on home video and the animated Renaissance films.

You bring up a good point about parents passing on their love of Disney to their children

The parents of Millennials were Boomers. Those who would see Walt on TV every week, knew of the Mousketeers, Davy Crockett and more. Saw theatrical re-releases of Snow White, Pinocchio, Peter Pan.

They knew the brand at a time when it peaked, and were raising kids during another peak, when the Disney of their youth was being broadcast on TV (Vault Disney) and having it's first and second round of home video releases, along side blockbuster new offerings in the parks and theaters.

That generation was primed to love Disney, and Disney benefited from the lack of serious competition in the early 90s.

Gen Alpha are the ones being raised on Frozen, Moana, Coco, Inside Out and Encanto with the sudden home access via D+ (that has a lot of echos of the VHS wave). It's too early to make calls on Gen Alpha. But my anecdotal experience is they don't have a lack of connection to Frozen and Moana.

While Gen Alpha will form strong attachments to specific Disney experiences, I don't think Disney's sphere of influence is as large as it was in the 90s, despite the company's growth. They have to compete with so many other things for kids attention, including non traditional media that didn't exist 30 years ago. If parent's today are priced out of Disney trips (or decide to go somewhere else) than that won't lead to the same generational right of passage. American animation has grown exponentially, and non US-content (Japanese in particular) is far more accessible than it was a generation ago.

Disney pushing other brands like Marvel and Star Wars IMO dilutes their ability to raise awareness on Disney proper and I don't think the remakes are leading kids today back to the originals like some hope. Maybe that's part of the reason Wish flopped. All the literal and figurative references went over their heads and didn't have any cultural meaning.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
My post did not single out Disney so let’s get that out of the way right off the bat. I have said it a million times, Disney will make the movies they want to make.

Any movie from any studio that screens to empty or near empty theaters are not selling enough concessions to survive.
Too many around here make this a Disney isolated thing, and so my response was just as much for them as it was for you.

You have me confused with other posts. I don’t give a cr@p about theaters. Theaters exist to support movie studios and Hollywood in my opinion. It’s the movie studios and Hollywood who should be worried in my opinion.
I'm not confusing you with anyone else. I'm well aware that you don't go to theaters (only going if your family drags you) or care about them.

Again my response was a general statement for all reading this thread. If anyone is worried about theaters then go, don't sit on the sidelines.

If movie theaters want to stay in business, movie studios must make movies that fill theaters. It’s the movie studios responsibility to make great movies, it’s NOT the movie going public’s responsibility in my opinion.
That unfortunately takes any responsibility out of the hands of the movie goer. Movie goers aren't innocent or even passive in this endeavor, they have a responsibility here too. It is their movie going habits that drive a lot of the decisions in Hollywood. Hollywood follows and chases after trends, if movie goers only go to a certain type of movie then a majority of movies produced will be of similar nature.

Long story short, if movie goers want more original movie then they need to start heading to originals that actually do get released. Then Hollywood will start making more and more originals rather than IPs driven movies and sequels/prequels/requels/reboots/etc.

This isn’t about a movie studio making a movie that loses 200M on a movie. This is about a movie studio (any movie studio) releasing movies that screen to empty or near empty theaters.

I let’s say a movie studio made great movie with an astronomical budget but the movie was so popular it packed the theaters, no one would care what it cost all they know is it’s good for the studio, the theaters and Hollywood.
Unfortunately as this forum has shown that just isn't the case. We've had quite a few movies released over the years that cost a lot and still packed them in theaters and they still get torn down by many folks here because of the budgets. Too many here still get worked up over high budgets.
 
Last edited:

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
If parent's today are priced out of Disney trips (or decide to go somewhere else) than that won't lead to the same generational right of passage.
This is the thing that in my eyes can be most problematic for Disney. I know that my time going to the parks is my biggest area of nostalgia. If I didn't have that, I wouldn't be as big of a fan as I am.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Are you talking about Star Wars here or Disney as a whole?
Both actually…which I’m sure Disney was fully aware of before they forked over $4 bil to George

They just have intentionally failed with it. They’ll never admit it…but trying to fool or overpower that fan base…that was already stirred up since 1999…had ZERO chance of success
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom