Agent H
Well-Known Member
Hey. I don’t make the surveys.And somehow TBA did, according to those TP surveys. It doesn't make any sense.
Hey. I don’t make the surveys.And somehow TBA did, according to those TP surveys. It doesn't make any sense.
Taking any bets for charity that Disney won't follow through with Dinosaur to Indy.
If they were to revitalize dinoland they would have to build something that works within the existing storyline. something they are obviously not interested in doing.Once camp cretaceous became popular(animated kids show set in movie universe), Disney waved the white flag. Universal has an all ages franchise with content for every relevant age group. Disney doesn't feel it's worth the effort to try and compete there.
Not saying it's right, but i sorta get it.
Yeah, I know, I still have my Kron and Bruton Happy Meal toys.
But come on, everybody uses this as a justification, but for all intents and purposes Dinosaur the ride is completely independent from Dinosaur the movie. No one goes on Dinosaur because of the movie. Seeker isn't in the movie.
Well…to be fair…it makes ZERO senseTaking any bets for charity that Disney won't follow through with Dinosaur to Indy.
Neither does anyone impartialHey. I don’t make the surveys.
It’s not like they have to tell the truth though
I'll take that bet, Matt! You see my blog post yesterday?
Meh, Dino never lived up to it's own expectation. A lesser experiential version of Alien Encounter where they rely on dark rooms with some flashing lights and sounds. With Indy there will actually be scenes to SEE inside of rolling around the corner into yet another pitch black room with nothing in it.There is no practical reason for them to replace Dinosaur. It really stinks. They could have fixed it up. But instead they're replacing it with more freaking IP, of diminishing relevance, too. Times are rough.
But at least I'll get to ride my long-time favorite attraction one last time.
I'll take that bet, Matt! You see my blog post yesterday?#
I’m confused. What are you trying to say here?Neither does anyone impartial
I’m confused. What are you trying to say here?
And how exactly do they this? Hmm?Word is Disney surveys are often constructed/worded to obtain a predetermined result, usually to justify a decision or course of action that someone in management is pushing for.
“Often”? You’re being extremely kindWord is Disney surveys are often constructed/worded to obtain a predetermined result, usually to justify a decision or course of action that someone in management is pushing for.
Actually they are the best private information gathering operation out thereAnd how exactly do they this? Hmm?
Are you asking a legitimate question or just doubting what I wrote?And how exactly do they this? Hmm?
Legitimately asking.Are you asking a legitimate question or just doubting what I wrote?
Legitimately asking.
Oh I don’t think there’s any confusion thereA misunderstanding has occurred. There was no promise that it’s exclusively expanded capacity. It’s capital investment of any sort, which obviously this is new capital investment. Even “new capital investment” is only 70%.
A further significant investment is not even really what you’d deem new at all, like the BTMM retrack. Thats still from another 30% sub-pot that’s more along the refurb pool.
“The Walt Disney Company is developing plans to accelerate and expand investment in its Parks, Experiences and Products segment to nearly double capital expenditures over the course of approximately 10 years to roughly $60 billion, including by investing in expanding and enhancing domestic and international parks and cruise line capacity.”
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.