MK Cars-Themed Attractions at Magic Kingdom

Agent H

Agent H

Well-Known Member
JoeCamel said:
Do you notice how they preserved the view of the mansion by variegating the canopy and blending the fence to hide the horde of people waiting in line?
Maybe the fences hiding the few people near the mesa?
Yeah, they used to think about those things......
Click to expand...
I don’t know what variegating means but I can still see the horde of people waiting in line not that it’s a problem of course
 
tpoly88

tpoly88

Well-Known Member
Grantwil93 said:
Im more saying that regardless of this leaving, it's not as if it's the only place to get this on property. I don't really believe they will pull off Cars land fitting well and I don't want the river gone.

Im just open to why it arguably has to go to do anything of substance in the area or beyond.
Click to expand...
I feel like they are trying to shoehorn cars land in. Like the villains land and would like to make sure that has the space it needs. Outside of Swiss family tree house and TSI there were no rides associated with movies or cartoons. Obviously they made all the movies later. Care land to me doesn’t belong in MK. Even if they kept TSI and ROA. Like them to keep the Pixar stuff together. They probably don’t have the space but care belongs in HS. Just my thoughts.
 
tpoly88

tpoly88

Well-Known Member
tpoly88 said:
I feel like they are trying to shoehorn cars land in. Like the villains land and would like to make sure that has the space it needs. Outside of Swiss family tree house and TSI there were no rides associated with movies or cartoons. Obviously they made all the movies later. Care land to me doesn’t belong in MK. Even if they kept TSI and ROA. Like them to keep the Pixar stuff together. They probably don’t have the space but care belongs in HS. Just my thoughts.
Click to expand...
Sorry forgot to add no movies in adventure and frontier lands.
 
Agent H

Agent H

Well-Known Member
tpoly88 said:
I feel like they are trying to shoehorn cars land in. Like the villains land and would like to make sure that has the space it needs. Outside of Swiss family tree house and TSI there were no rides associated with movies or cartoons. Obviously they made all the movies later. Care land to me doesn’t belong in MK. Even if they kept TSI and ROA. Like them to keep the Pixar stuff together. They probably don’t have the space but care belongs in HS. Just my thoughts.
Click to expand...
I didn’t know we were getting a Care Bears land!
 
TheMaxRebo

TheMaxRebo

Well-Known Member
tpoly88 said:
I feel like they are trying to shoehorn cars land in. Like the villains land and would like to make sure that has the space it needs. Outside of Swiss family tree house and TSI there were no rides associated with movies or cartoons. Obviously they made all the movies later. Care land to me doesn’t belong in MK. Even if they kept TSI and ROA. Like them to keep the Pixar stuff together. They probably don’t have the space but care belongs in HS. Just my thoughts.
Click to expand...

I just think they wanted to build out "beyond Big Thunder" and they determined that significant work would realistically be needed to the river to enable sufficient crowd flow. Not that it all has to go but while they are doing to work might as well add more rides and capacity there vs the space that didn't get a ton of usage for the area it took up, etc - so added benefit of even more capacity / worth the trade off - especially compared to reduced version that would have been left

Then they have Cars which is a very popular IP and not really represented at WDW and thought kill 2 birds with one stone and use that as the IP for the area and use National Parks as the theme to fit better

Not what I would have done but can also understand the thinking and hope the end product is great - but do think the margin of error is high
 
Agent H

Agent H

Well-Known Member
Disgruntled Walt said:
Yeah, actually his return rate on "pet projects" is not very good.
Click to expand...
In order captain eo star tours mgm studios and tower of terror muppet vision 3d euro Disneyland extraterrestrial alien encounter Indiana Jones adventure Disney California adventure and Walt Disney studios Paris only thing that got cut that I would consider pet projects of his is muppet studios
 
lazyboy97o

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Agent H said:
In order captain eo star tours mgm studios and tower of terror muppet vision 3d euro Disneyland extraterrestrial alien encounter Indiana Jones adventure Disney California adventure and Walt Disney studios Paris only thing that got cut that I would consider pet projects of his is muppet studios
Click to expand...
You think Walt Disney Studios Park was a pet project? Only in that it was the sad remnants of a much bigger vision that included Disney-MGM Studios Europe, Tokyo Disney-MGM Studios and the Disney-MGM Studios Backlot.

We can just skip to the big one, Shanghai Disneyland.
 
Disgruntled Walt

Disgruntled Walt

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
Agent H said:
In order captain eo star tours mgm studios and tower of terror muppet vision 3d euro Disneyland extraterrestrial alien encounter Indiana Jones adventure Disney California adventure and Walt Disney studios Paris only thing that got cut that I would consider pet projects of his is muppet studios
Click to expand...
Disney's America?
 
EagleScout610

EagleScout610

Owner of a RKF - Resting Kermit Face
Premium Member
SamusAranX said:
Kind of like with the SM mountain changeover, I love the revisionist back flips being done now to rationalize these changes, suddenly saying a quality, well built part of MK fabric and history just wasn’t that good.

Change “SM wasn’t that great of an attraction and needed repairs anyway”

To-

“Frontierland in WDW wasn’t that great the others are better. And nobody visited TSI it was outdated and not popular. So who cares”.
Click to expand...
They could announce the castle is leaving tommorow and it'd suddenly be "Well where's Cinderella's attraction? The last movie about her tanked, there's other castles around the world". It's madness
 
MisterPenguin

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Agent H said:
I don’t know what variegating means
Click to expand...
Here are variegated leaves. This should clear up all confusion...

1740067834126.png
 
Agent H

Agent H

Well-Known Member
lazyboy97o said:
You think Walt Disney Studios Park was a pet project? Only in that it was the sad remnants of a much bigger vision that included Disney-MGM Studios Europe, Tokyo Disney-MGM Studios and the Disney-MGM Studios Backlot.

We can just skip to the big one, Shanghai Disneyland.
Click to expand...
I do consider it one as the remains of those plans it was just done cheaper than originally planned
 
G

Grantwil93

Well-Known Member
TheMaxRebo said:
I just think they wanted to build out "beyond Big Thunder" and they determined that significant work would realistically be needed to the river to enable sufficient crowd flow. Not that it all has to go but while they are doing to work might as well add more rides and capacity there vs the space that didn't get a ton of usage for the area it took up, etc - so added benefit of even more capacity / worth the trade off - especially compared to reduced version that would have been left

Then they have Cars which is a very popular IP and not really represented at WDW and thought kill 2 birds with one stone and use that as the IP for the area and use National Parks as the theme to fit better

Not what I would have done but can also understand the thinking and hope the end product is great - but do think the margin of error is high
Click to expand...
This is pretty much exactly where im at with it. They will do what makes the most sense overall to them. Its why Monsters land is going where it is, because they get a full land out of it with a fraction of the work needed compared to Animation courtyard.
People act like them compromising things is new, but it's not. I mean, Dinoland and Camp Minnie Mickey were to entire lands that were compromised and are still being "fixed"

No one is offering feasible crowd flow and infrastructure solutions while being able to save the river. I'm sure there is one, but if we cant figure one out, than how can we ask them to "not do this?"

And, "just build beyond the front section" isn't a solution. It's an idea that is way more complicated than ppl give it credit
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom