Just some reminders:
When talking about capacity, we have to differentiate between theoretical capacity and operational capacity (the real throughput).
When thinking about how an attraction will affect crowding, we also have to look at how many people will be in the queue and on/in the attraction at a given time (minus the number of additional guests in the park due to the attraction).
For how a land will affect crowds, we should also look at how many people will be in the land at a given time who would’ve contributed to crowding elsewhere in the park (e.g., more people spending time in Monstropolis than were spending time in Muppets Courtyard), but then also take into account how it will affect crowd patterns (e.g., Monstropolis causing Grand Avenue to become a pinch-point).
My guesses are:
-For a while after opening, Monstropolis will increase attendance/crowds, which most notably might result in some potential crowd-flow issues around Grand Avenue initially.
-Once the area/coaster is no longer new, it will help distribute crowds more evenly throughout the park by pulling more people into that area than the number of people that were spending time in Muppets Courtyard, which will be a boon for overall guest experience/satisfaction with DHS relative to how they are now.
(None of the above comments are related to whether or not Montropolis should have been put here or in AC, or whether it’s enough, or even whether it’s the right addition at all. And I’m certainly not suggesting that it will solve all of the park’s capacity/crowding problems, only that it should—after a while—mitigate them to some degree relative to the current situation.)