• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

DAK 'Encanto' and 'Indiana Jones'-themed experiences at Animal Kingdom

Starship824

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
The "Possible Animal Exhibit" is the new play area, probably Mayan themed. Allegedly.

The blue buildings with the current Dinorama restrooms are restrooms and a new character greeting venue. Allegedly.

The Carousel will also be the DVC kiosk location, as well as covered queue area. Allegedly.

The long, rectangular blue area across from the kiosk is supposedly part of the village theming. Allegedly.

And the circular thing on the path into the land is the new fountain. Allegedly.
Allegedly, possibly, maybe.
1000001995.gif
 

bmr1591

Well-Known Member
I don't believe that Animal Kingdom needs new live animal exhibits, IMO this is not the future. As long as the park is about animals and their environment then that's fine, it can be done without live animals (erm, Dinosaur, Kali, Everest...). Remains to be seen how well Encanto and Indiana Jones can do this.

What's crazy is that Joe Rohde sold the idea of Animal Kingdom by bringing a live tiger into the board room. Encounters with real animals are exciting and engaging. Whether they have animals or not in CA remains to be seen, but it would be disappointing if there are none.
 

Bocabear

Well-Known Member
How long until the fountain becomes a planter?
TBH, the way things seem to go, it may end up one before it is finished.....maybe they could put lights in the pavement around it..... oh wait, nevermind....
A large plaza fountain would be a beautiful addition... something nice about moving water... visually cooling in what is the hottest of the Theme parks.
 

FettFan

Well-Known Member
I haven't been to Animal Kingdom in over a decade, but I remember there was a fairly large and empty shaded area near Dinosaur. It looked like an area where they planned to build more animal exhibits but ran out of time and/or money to complete.

Are you referring to the area that pathways from Dinosaur’s exit to the gas-station themed gift shop?
 

Chester&Hester Enthusiast

Well-Known Member
I don’t disagree that wait time is less useful when comparing 2 rides with very different capacity like Pan and Pirates but with Dinosaur it’s easy enough to just compare it to its operational clone at Disneyland. The Indy ride there has a very similar capacity (maybe the same?) but has much longer waits so I think it’s fair to call that ride more popular. As I said before I think that’s not just the theme/IP being more popular. There is way more foot traffic past that ride at DL vs Dinoland at AK.

I'm way late to this party, so somebody may have already pointed this out, but Disneyland sees almost twice as many daily visitors as DAK on average. I would assume that plays into wait times. If you're going to use wait times as a metric for comparing popularity, you need to account for all variables.
 

Moth

Well-Known Member
I will smuggle in ducks and squirrels.
It's Florida, those two and the Black and White Argentine Tegu.... Wait...

EUREKA! Disney can just grab a bunch of those guys from the Florida wilderness since they're invasive!

I'd rather a Play Area versus live animals for a hypothetical phase one, a play area being there will make life easier in the long run for any live animals housed. Also animals require a lot of paper work and approval, down to each inch of the habitat, so I wouldn't be shocked if Disney wanted to take it bit by bit.
 

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
It's Florida, those two and the Black and White Argentine Tegu.... Wait...

EUREKA! Disney can just grab a bunch of those guys from the Florida wilderness since they're invasive!

I'd rather a Play Area versus live animals for a hypothetical phase one, a play area being there will make life easier in the long run for any live animals housed. Also animals require a lot of paper work and approval, down to each inch of the habitat, so I wouldn't be shocked if Disney wanted to take it bit by bit.
Sooner or later, there will be anacondas on public display!
 

MrPromey

Well-Known Member
I don't believe that Animal Kingdom needs new live animal exhibits, IMO this is not the future. As long as the park is about animals and their environment then that's fine, it can be done without live animals (erm, Dinosaur, Kali, Everest...). Remains to be seen how well Encanto and Indiana Jones can do this.

It's a darn shame the name "Islands of Adventure" is already taken. I wonder if they could put Disney in front and change the park name to "Disney's Islands of Adventure®" to better reflect the direction they're moving in... or maybe they could call it "Disney's Continents of Adventure®".

Or - and maybe this is more on-brand - they could do like they did when they decided to open a property on the east coast that was larger than the the original and just rename the park "Adventure World" where unlike that corner of the MK, they have the "blessing of size"?
 

etc98

Well-Known Member
I’m curious if they’ll re-theme the area outside the land’s boundaries or leave it generic looking.

(When walking into Dinoland from Discovery Island, the walkway to your left, before the Boneyard, running along the amphitheater’s edge, past the Theatre in the Wild and to the bridge to Asia)
It wasn’t included at all in the plans that were just released so my guess is they won’t change it. Probably want to be able to keep that section open so there won’t be any dead ends in the park even during construction
 

Incomudro

Well-Known Member
It's Florida, those two and the Black and White Argentine Tegu.... Wait...

EUREKA! Disney can just grab a bunch of those guys from the Florida wilderness since they're invasive!

I'd rather a Play Area versus live animals for a hypothetical phase one, a play area being there will make life easier in the long run for any live animals housed. Also animals require a lot of paper work and approval, down to each inch of the habitat, so I wouldn't be shocked if Disney wanted to take it bit by bit.
Only a matter of time 'till Anaconda become native to Florida too.
Perhaps Jaguars... They can put a check on the Alligator population.
 

Starship824

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
I have a feeling that if there was an animal exhibit instead of a play area there would tons of complaints that there isn't a play area after they replaced the boneyard. Now, of course none of this in confirmed so it's possible there is an animal exhibit and it's possible there is no play area. But I doubt that. I personally don't see a problem with this not having animal exhibits considering Dino Land only had one and most people didn't know it was there and the rest of the land is to put it bluntly, bad.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom