wbostic12
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- No
Got a shot of that?Scaffolding has been removed from the left portion of the mountain, and it still looks exactly like splash mountain except with a few splotches of green…
Got a shot of that?Scaffolding has been removed from the left portion of the mountain, and it still looks exactly like splash mountain except with a few splotches of green…
When they get the big wind from right of the hill all that green will blow over to the left evening it out. Disney imagineering at it's finestScaffolding has been removed from the left portion of the mountain, and it still looks exactly like splash mountain except with a few splotches of green…
I like the moving goalposts. When folks complained about the reskin, some said "it's still the same ride, it's just going to look different." Now when folks point out that it isn't a new ride, but just a reskin, we're told "Tiana's is a new ride."That's ridiculous. New Capacity and New Attractions are not the same thing.
You can complain if you'd like that this doesn't technically add new capacity to The Magic Kingdom, that's not wrong. But Tiana's is a new ride. No matter how many times you've ridden Splash Mountain, you've never ridden Tiana's Bayou Adventure. Because the old ride has been transformed into a new one you haven't experienced yet.
I like the moving goalposts. When folks complained about the reskin, some said "it's still the same ride, it's just going to look different." Now when folks point out that it isn't a new ride, but just a reskin, we're told "Tiana's is a new ride."
![]()
I hope you brought the Celestron so we can see the backside of the buildingI got a ton of photos today I'll share when I'm home tonight.![]()
I can't wait for Pirates to get reskinned to Luca or Moana.This is just a glorified (and way over priced) attraction maintenance. Once again, not an ADDITIONAL attraction, just a renovated one.
I will admit, the costly maintenance for the old Splash mountain and the lack of spare parts, is probably the REAL reason Splash was re skinned to Tiana and at the same time, they could do some social justice while they were at it,
Well, thing is, Most Hot Sauce Companies are still privately or family owned. McIlhenny Company, makers of Tabasco, is still owned by the Mcllhenny family and bottled on Avery Island, just like it’s been since 1868. And all the salt in the sauces did used to come from the Island’s salt dome, too. Crystal is still owned by Baumer Foods and Headquartered in New Orleans. The only big exception for nationwide brands is Cholula, which is owned by McCormick. It’s really interesting, tbh.I have a feeling Disney will go the cheapest way possible for maximum profit and we know Iger loves China so..![]()
Here's hoping we don't get some generic hot sauce from China in Tiana labeled bottles.Well, thing is, Most Hot Sauce Companies are still privately or family owned. McIlhenny Company, makers of Tabasco, is still owned by the Mcllhenny family and bottled on Avery Island, just like it’s been since 1868. And all the salt in the sauces did used to come from the Island’s salt dome, too. Crystal is still owned by Baumer Foods and Headquartered in New Orleans. The only big exception for nationwide brands is Cholula, which is owned by McCormick. It’s really interesting, tbh.
I would love if they used Cholula. Wouldn't really fit the theme but it's my favorite somewhat mild hot sauce.Well, thing is, Most Hot Sauce Companies are still privately or family owned. McIlhenny Company, makers of Tabasco, is still owned by the Mcllhenny family and bottled on Avery Island, just like it’s been since 1868. And all the salt in the sauces did used to come from the Island’s salt dome, too. Crystal is still owned by Baumer Foods and Headquartered in New Orleans. The only big exception for nationwide brands is Cholula, which is owned by McCormick. It’s really interesting, tbh.
IMO, that would be the most likely, since it’s the only corporately owned.I would love if they used Cholula. Wouldn't really fit the theme but it's my favorite somewhat mild hot sauce.
Seriously, this is an opportunity for some sort of partnership/sponsorship thing for Disney. Lets hope they are smart.IMO, that would be the most likely, since it’s the only corporately owned.
Given how they’ve been spotlighting local artists from/near New Orleans, and highlighting African American contributions to local culture, I could see them partnering with a smaller, African American owned hot sauce / food distributor for a co-branding opportunity.Seriously, this is an opportunity for some sort of partnership/sponsorship thing for Disney. Lets hope they are smart.
That is, if they’re motivated by such a thing. The big money sponsorship comes by signing on with one of the larger enterprises.Given how they’ve been spotlighting local artists from/near New Orleans, and highlighting African American contributions to local culture, I could see them partnering with a smaller, African American owned hot sauce / food distributor for a co-branding opportunity.
Corporate owned? Absolutely not! Which hot sauce is produced by an employee-owned cooperative?IMO, that would be the most likely, since it’s the only corporately owned.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.