Chi84
Premium Member
The following quote clearly indicated that the poster found something different in this remake as opposed to the other remakes. That is why I asked about the difference.So, I've been on the "Don't want to see this for a while," and my reasoning has always been I'm sick of these remakes that are basically the same movie (taking away stuff like Cruela and Maleficent here). I know among friends, I'm not alone. SO, you asked what's different about this movie vs the others. I'm curious if others are like me and just sick of this type of movie, or if we need to dig deeper into reasoning.
Long story short, I'm wondering if this is the start of a trend of people being sick of the remakes, but we won't know if that's the case without some more movies to check against.
I didn't find anything significantly different - in fact I liked it better than the others. You think the difference may be that people have suddenly become tired of live-action remakes, but that doesn't seem to be what was being advanced by the above quote.For perspective, here is how similar live-action remakes performed in this Disney fanatic market (not adjusted for inflation to help TLM):
Alice in Wonderland: $134M
Beauty and the Beast: $111M
Aladdin: $112M
The Little Mermaid: $25M estimated
I leave it up to the reader to determine what is different in this particular remake compared to its much more successful predecessors of remade beloved Disney animated classics.