Chip Chipperson
Well-Known Member
I don't really think there has been dishonest messaging about the vaccine. We knew the vaccines provided good protection from the original strain of the virus for at least 6 months. We didn't have time to wait and see if the protection would last long term, or if it would hold up to variants of the virus., but they are still providing the most important thing, protection for sever illness and death.
I have gotten three doses of the vaccine, so right now I am on pace to have about 2 doses per year, as compared to the one dose per year I take for flu. It's not like we are being asked to get a covid shot every month.
I agree. The messaging from health officials has been honest from the beginning. When the vaccine makers, FDA, etc. are putting a percentage on the vaccines' efficacy, they are acknowledging quite clearly that they are not 100% effective at preventing cases. The only dishonest messaging is coming from anti-vaxxers "just asking questions" like "If vaccines are safe and effective then why do you need me to get it to protect you?" or "If the vaccines are safe and effective then why are there breakthrough cases?" These talking points were created by anti-vaxxers to con the less-informed and gullible into believing their rhetoric so they can sell more "herbal supplements" or books with recipes for DIY remedies and make them think that they're "thinking for themselves" rather than being sheep.