Incomudro
Well-Known Member
WALL-E belongs,and should be represented in Epcot.No, WALL-E doesn't fit in Animal Kingdom. While it does have an environmental subtext, the film is largely not set on earth and the inclusion of nature is relegated to a small plant. There are no animals featured throughout the entire film. WALL-E's subject matter differs considerably from DAK, to the point where no amount of imagineering could make it work in the park. Just because a film has similar themes to DAK does not mean it can automatically fit, when the subject matter, art style etc. differ so greatly.
And this is one of the fundamental problems with only using existing IPs in the parks. It's extremely limiting to what imagineering can do. No dinosaur IP? No dinosaurs in DAK
There really are not that many IPs in Disney's library that are based on the same subject matter and themes as DAK. Moana has similar themes so you could make it work so long as you shifted the subject matter to focus more on animals. Like was done with Pandora. But obviously a true non-IP Oceania themed land, similar to Harambe or Anandapur, would be far superior to a Moana anything. I think pretty much every fan of DAK would agree to that.
I've said before much as I'm ok with the Guardian's coaster, that it should have been a WALL-E coaster.
The coaster portion could have been a homage to the flying/fire extinguisher sequence in the film.
Last edited: