BlakeW39
Well-Known Member
umm the natural relics are not magical, therefore the entire premise of the ride doesn't work...so...there is that. And the setting for Mystic Manor is an outpost in the jungle with an explorer and collector...
you can get mired in the missing conservation storyline, but the setting certainly feels like the park...
Adventure, Exploration, A Monkey, a little magic... It is not jarringly off course...Like Moana in the front of EPCOT is....
Mystic Manor feels like it could fit....
Which was the same justification for FEA... and quite frankly Expedition Everest and it's mythical yeti....There is no animal tie-in other than that, and we all accepted and love it....because it feels right in that park...
A couple of things.
1. Moana fits in EPCOT better than Mystic Manor fits in DAK.
2. Expedition Everest is accepted in DAK because it fits the themes of DAK perfectly.
3. Mystic Manor doesn't "feel like" it fits in DAK. At least, not in my opinion. It would water DAK down to just being a big Adventureland, which is a major fear of mine now that Rohde is gone. Just because Mystic Manor is 'adventurey' and takes place in a jungle doesn't mean it has any place in Animal Kingdom.
Back in the day, Disney used to localize attractions to fit. So, Mystic Manor DAK could easily be Henry's naturalist brother or sister set in South America or a fantasy jungle - retooling many of the gags to be about interactions with animals or any number of stories.
But, that would take effort and not allow the cap ex to be shared like direct cloning does...
Now this I could get behind. If Mystic Manor is updated to being about a naturalist's manor that has all kinds of fossils, zoological specimens, and bizarre creatures... that would be awesome. But the version of Mystic Manor in Hong Kong includes historical artifacts and has nothing to do with animals or nature. Thus, it doesn't fit in DAK any more than Indy does.
Last edited: