SWL doesn't fit DCA, but better it had gone there.
I was on the fence about Star Wars Land, as in I was not as passionately against it as some...but not entirely thrilled about its placement either.
Then I was perusing Google Earth for another project I was working on and found this...
View attachment 201393
Ok I'm taking a side now.
Oh the humanity....
Is there an issue with that?You're seeing that now for the first time?
Is there an issue with that?
Been following along with the DHS updates if at all moreso than Disneyland -- so yes.
I mean if you look back a dozen or so pages (think from Dec or so) I remember having this discussion where while I could see why people didn't want it, on paper it didn't seem like the end of the world to me. And I've seen a few construction updates from the sides, seeing it in concept art, eh it's okay.Well alrighty then.
I mean if you look back a dozen or so pages (think from Dec or so) I remember having this discussion where while I could see why people didn't want it, on paper it didn't seem like the end of the world to me. And I've seen a few construction updates from the sides, seeing it in concept art, eh it's okay.
Then I saw that image and while a bit hyperbolic given the dirt around the exteriors that isn't part of the land -- it's way too big of a chunk of Disneyland. So peg me on the side against it.
I've been aware of the scope, but sometimes things on paper are not as they are in practice. That and I haven't been keeping up with the DL projects as much as I used to.Yeah this has been debated ad nauseum for almost 2 years now online on various Disney fan sites. Sorry, but I can't help but be surprised that you were unaware of the scope of this project.
Plus the river, part of the island, train tracks, berm, backstage facilities, etc.Surely not all of that is going to be Star Wars, is it?
I would think that a good portion of that is going to have to be general park infrastructure that was bumped back and now has to be rebuilt.
I've been aware of the scope, but sometimes things on paper are not as they are in practice. That and I haven't been keeping up with the DL projects as much as I used to.
Since this is the negative Star Wars thread, I figured I'd post my updated, adjusted opinion.
Thanks! Still huge...the tumor comparison is on point.BTW, here's a more recent photo of the construction.
Do you think this is a good move?
Do you think this is a good move?
So everyone is entitled to their opinions...but there's no basis for arguing a counter opinion to yours? Okay then.Of course I do. I've pretty much read every argument and nothing I've seen has convinced me otherwise. Everyone is entitled to their opinions and we all have our personal preferences, but there's no basis for arguing that SW Land isn't a good fit for Disneyland.
So everyone is entitled to their opinions...but there's no basis for arguing a counter opinion to yours? Okay then.
I was on the fence about Star Wars Land, as in I was not as passionately against it as some...but not entirely thrilled about its placement either.
Then I was perusing Google Earth for another project I was working on and found this...
View attachment 201393
Ok I'm taking a side now.
Oh the humanity....
So everyone is entitled to their opinions...but there's no basis for arguing a counter opinion to yours? Okay then.
They are building an entertainment area themed to Star Wars, a hugely popular IP for all ages that has had a featured E ticket ride, as well as other minor attractions, at Disneyland for almost 30 years. If you aren't a fan fine, but in my view there's no reasonable argument that confirms what they are building isn't a legitimate thing to add to Disneyland.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.