When focusing on that type of argument, how about thinking about how many attractions existed for Potter when it first opened. I believe it was two including dueling Dragons or whatever they called it back then. It's not like they opened the land with a full number of attractions that you are counting on your fingers. It has taken years for them to add two more and one was just a very docile, but, gobsmackingly themed train with stations at both ends and a very impressive but quite tiny area with a fire breathing dragon and another ride. Now this new cycle ride part which replace an already existing coaster. I see no real net gain in that. Perhaps we can come back when the same amount of time has lapsed since initial openings and see if one outweighs the other. I don't know who will win, but, neither does anyone else so I guess we will just have to wait and see. Plus Universal requires you to pay for two parks to see the whole thing. For someone like me that isn't into 90% of what is in IoA that seems like a hefty cost to just experience one IP. Also, how many really good attractions were sacrificed to build those lands. In DHS, just about nothing worth talking about. A fake city/movie set and a long dead backstage tour. But, then we would have to factor in that there were two more attractions added considering TSL. The one that comes to mind in Uni would be "Jaws". A far better attraction then the two lost ones I mentioned in DHS.