There's no suppression occuring here. It's not in the story, it's not part of the show.
The episode in question had to be changed to remove the references. It wasn’t during development; the voice actress was quite taken aback when she found out a few months ago.
No-one is denying these things happen; the world of entertainment can be cutthroat and unpredictable. The only thing I was questioning was why you thought such a move would serve the story better. That’s something you haven’t been able to explain.
Why is someone’s trans identity political?
There’s nothing to suggest the story was going to be presented in politicised terms. We were going to be shown the personal struggles of a 14-year-old trans girl.
It’s very much on-topic. If it weren’t, you wouldn’t have seen fit to post about it repeatedly.
Awww thanks Buford. Right back at ya
You are working to make certain words meaningless - “political,” “problematic,” “story.” This desire to separate words from meaning, to render language a thing that obscures rather then reveals truth, indeed to destabilize and devalue the entire concept of truth itself, is something we’ve seen before in world history. Indeed, Hannah Arendt writes of it very eloquently.
I’m happy discussing it right here, as apparently are you. The posts on this topic have multiplied because of your interventions, not in spite of them.
For multiple reasons, I’d suggest Moon is one of the very, very few posters on these boards with whom it is useless to engage.
