RobWDW1971
Well-Known Member
The struggle with those models is we actually have other countries like China and South Korea that are ahead of us on the curve and they didn't see anything like those types of numbers so you would have to assume the US spirals out of control far beyond what any other country has seen.I agree totally.
I fully support, for lack of a better phrase but if this is a war, an exit strategy from our current situation that does not rely on a complete elimination of the virus either through vaccine or other means. I believe in cost/benefit analysis.
It is indeed about scale and perspective and where one's, again probably wrong phrase, ROI point is on all this.
I have no model. The best I've found is the one at the bottom of the article below that allows you to manipulate all variables and visualize the outcome for any combo. Set to its most completely unrealistic extreme worst-case settings (each sick person infects 5 others, death rate of 4%) and with no intervention whatsoever it estimates 4-5 million dead in the US (about 1.5% of our population) and about 220 million dead worldwide (2.8% of all people).
I have no idea where my ROI is on this model. I do know, no matter the settings, that it doesn't fall in April. Using a setting of 38 days from today of an aggressive near-draconian intervention, each sick person infects 2.5 others, and a death rate of 1%, you end up with maybe 500,000 in the hospital and about 250,000 dead. Give a little leeway to work and social distancing rules and maintain other settings, you'll get nearly a million dead.
Again, I don't know where my ROI point is on this but it ain't that.
Where's yours?
Opinion | Trump Wants to ‘Reopen America.’ Here’s What Happens if We Do. (Published 2020)
Many could die if we ease up too soon.www.nytimes.com
That is going to be a hard sell to the American people.
On the trade-off, since the vast majority of deaths will be the elderly (and those with pre-existing conditions) using an average annual fatalities of about 2.1 million seniors in the US, you would have to be talking about a 25% increase to warrant this kind of economic devastation. So cocktail napkin that is about 500K incremental deaths over a normal year. We are a long way from that at this point.
It's sad, but I think very true that this headline (on page 5 somewhere) two months ago would not have caused the market to even blip:
"CDC estimates abnormally high flu season with introduction of new virus and forecasts 25% increase in elderly deaths in 2020".
Senior living development stocks would have taken a beating, but other healthcare stocks would have bounced.
Can you imagine the shrug a 10% (200,000) or 5% (100,000) increase would have gotten?
Last edited: