RSoxNo1
Well-Known Member
Where did he say this?For what it's worth, Kevin Rafferty, said this afternoon, that no decision has been made about building Carsland in FL. I know he could be simply toeing the company line, but he seemed pretty sincere.
Where did he say this?For what it's worth, Kevin Rafferty, said this afternoon, that no decision has been made about building Carsland in FL. I know he could be simply toeing the company line, but he seemed pretty sincere.
Not really sure what you're trying to say here. Are you saying Simpsons is being overlooked? Because the imperical evidence is saying the exact opposite. It was a big story on internet media sites like AV Club, IGN, Buzzfeed, as well as other smaller sites. It was the number 1 post on Reddit for a few days. The restaurant has had a line just to enter it just like the "hallowed" Be Our Guest. Bloggers from Attractions and Touring Plans have been lauding the food choices.
I'd say that's far from overlooked.
I agree with everything but this last part. Comcast has shareholders that are just as crazy as Disney's, if this next round of expansions under-perform in any way, the dynamic will shift. Plus, Comcast has a capital intensive cable industry to keep up with. An industry that has tremendous pressure on it at the moment from folks like Google and hungry and desperate Telecoms. Comcast is doing the right things at the moment for most of NBCUniversal, but it is still very early in the game to make long term assumptions.
However, market trends are heavily against Comcast and other companies that rely on distributing other companies' content to the consumer. Mediums like the WatchESPN App, HBO GO, Amazon Prime Instant Video, Netflix, Roku, etc. are allowing consumers to move more towards a la carte programming. I don't see it being more than five years before you'll be able to pay ESPN or HBO directly for their service rather than going through a service provider like Comcast. Their model is a distributor/middleman function, which is being undermined by technology and consumer choice.All that being said, Comcast is a very well run company with highly competent management and based on how much my cable bill is each month they have a healthy business model. The Universal parks provide an excellent place to invest all the cash they generate from me.
However, market trends are heavily against Comcast and other companies that rely on distributing other companies' content to the consumer. Mediums like the WatchESPN App, HBO GO, Amazon Prime Instant Video, Netflix, Roku, etc. are allowing consumers to move more towards a la carte programming. I don't see it being more than five years before you'll be able to pay ESPN or HBO directly for their service rather than going through a service provider like Comcast. Their model is a distributor/middleman function, which is being undermined by technology and consumer choice.
I don't doubt that they'll continue to be profitable. But I think it's also unreasonable to say that their cable/media businesses will provide billions of cash to fund their theme parks forever and always.Comcast has shifted it's view towards its internet service, though. I think they'll continue to upgrade that in the next few years to ensure they're still one of the top providers whether it's cable or internet.
I don't doubt that they'll continue to be profitable. But I think it's also unreasonable to say that their cable/media businesses will provide billions of cash to fund their theme parks forever and always.
Couldn't the same be said of Disney in that regard? And whose to say Comcast wont branch out and do other things the way Disney has.I don't doubt that they'll continue to be profitable. But I think it's also unreasonable to say that their cable/media businesses will provide billions of cash to fund their theme parks forever and always.
I don't doubt that they'll continue to be profitable. But I think it's also unreasonable to say that their cable/media businesses will provide billions of cash to fund their theme parks forever and always.
However, market trends are heavily against Comcast and other companies that rely on distributing other companies' content to the consumer. Mediums like the WatchESPN App, HBO GO, Amazon Prime Instant Video, Netflix, Roku, etc. are allowing consumers to move more towards a la carte programming. I don't see it being more than five years before you'll be able to pay ESPN or HBO directly for their service rather than going through a service provider like Comcast. Their model is a distributor/middleman function, which is being undermined by technology and consumer choice.
I don't doubt that they'll continue to be profitable. But I think it's also unreasonable to say that their cable/media businesses will provide billions of cash to fund their theme parks forever and always.
Thanks for pointing this out. Media distribution is changing rapidly and Comcast Cable is quickly becoming an antiquated service. It won't be tomorrow, or even in five years that it is gone, but the way we consume media is quickly changing. Comcast and DirecTV know this and are holding on for dear life. At least Comcast has alternate products... I don't know what DirecTV will do.
Disney has its risk areas, but this one ain't it. People WANT ESPN. They don't care if they get it from Comcast, DirecTV, DISH, Verizon, AT&T, whoever. Given the choice, the consumer would purchase it directly from Disney if possible, eliminating paying for the "bundle" of crap channels they don't want and eliminating the markup charged by the middleman (which, no doubt, Disney will claim some of for themselves).Couldn't the same be said of Disney in that regard?
True, but we will still need an Internet connection to access the distribution.
Yes, but cable companies make a lot more money off providing content then they do providing Internet service. In 2012 Comcast earned $5 billion in revenue from Video but only $2.4 from internet access.
Maybe Disney should have contracted Comcast for Disney's infrastructure for FP+. Comcast has experience implementing data service in large areas..Comcast is doing well on the data side. 2012 was another great year for them in sub. and revenue growth for this product. Their competition is also enjoying similar success as that industry continues to flourish.
Maybe Disney should have contracted Comcast for Disney's infrastructure for FP+. Comcast has experience implementing data service in large areas..
In my area AT&T is still struggling with their fiber rollout. If you are too far from the hub, you can't get service.Just my guess that AT&T and Verizon would have more recent experience to offer since I believe they have rolled out data service across broader areas over the last few years.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
