Ok, good point. As long as there isn't a huge Starbucks sign hanging over Main Street, I guess I will live!
I think if you look at some photos on how DCA integrated their Starbucks location and I think you'll be pleased.....
Ok, good point. As long as there isn't a huge Starbucks sign hanging over Main Street, I guess I will live!
No we "all" don't. I could care less about them having MILF in TomorrowLand, which is has really been nothing more than ScienceFictionLand for quite some time. I also do not care about them having running water, electric lights and paved streets in FrontierLand. There reaches a certain point where attention to detail can be taken too far.But Starbucks wasn't around in the early 1900's and we all complain about milf being in tomorrowland and stuff like that
No we "all" don't. I could care less about them having MILF in TomorrowLand, which is has really been nothing more than ScienceFictionLand for quite some time. I also do not care about them having running water, electric lights and paved streets in FrontierLand. There reaches a certain point where attention to detail can be taken too far.
I got a drink there this summer, and I thought it was a nice addition with not too much of an emphasis on it being a starbucksI think if you look at some photos on how DCA integrated their Starbucks location and I think you'll be pleased.....
Many people have a basic dislike to sponsor signs placed within WDW largely because it "interferes" with their enjoyment of the theme parks. It is an intrusion of the outside world into WDW. The reaction is not logical; it's emotional. They want WDW to be "pure", never mind that TWDC is one of the largest corporations in the world.
Ok, but also, in frontierland, the lights are at least themed to lanterns and all of the lands are like that in theming those things into the land.No we "all" don't. I could care less about them having MILF in TomorrowLand, which is has really been nothing more than ScienceFictionLand for quite some time. I also do not care about them having running water, electric lights and paved streets in FrontierLand. There reaches a certain point where attention to detail can be taken too far.
Ok, but also, in frontierland, the lights are at least themed to lanterns and all of the lands are like that in theming those things into the land.
Ok, but also, in frontierland, the lights are at least themed to lanterns and all of the lands are like that in theming those things into the land.
How about they get rid of Starbucks and put in a Cafe Du Monde?
Hot coffee and New Orleans style beignets.
Imagine how much more you would pay to be in the parks if they weren't part of it. Actually, you might even have to imagine the park itself being there with out the outside support.
That argument really doesn't hold water. There isn't one thing found in any of the locations on Main Street that existed in that time frame. How would you justify all of that and yet think that Starbucks doesn't fit because of it? They didn't have much in the line of running water or flush toilets during that time either, should that be left out? Oh, yea...the streets were all dirt and mud then too.
I would share your concern if I thought that they were going to tear out the front and make it look like a current day Starbucks, but they aren't going to do that. I'm sure they had coffee back in the beginning of the 20th century too, just maybe not that brand. There is nothing bad about it being there, there is nothing that is going to "kill" the image. In fact, within a week, it will go completely unnoticed except for those that have to have their coffee.
I don't have a problem with sponsors or brands inside Disney, as long as its done tastefully. As others have posted, when I go to WDW, I'm trying to escape the real world, that's why I put my cell phone away, I don't watch the news, and I completely let Disney World fill my every thought. That being said, I wouldn't like to walk down Main Street and see huge signs for places that exist in the outside world, however I've seen the pictures of Starbucks from DL and they did a great job incorporating it and making it not look like the 30 million other Starbucks that are on every corner. As for sponsorships, as someone else said, atleast you know that ride/pavalion has a better chance of actually working and not having pieces fall off and hit people in the head, unlike other rides currently in WDW. I would actually like more sponsors, specifically in EPCOT, they usually have some unique items in their shops so you aren't thrown in yet another Disney shop at the end of the ride.
I'm somewhat confused at your post since I said I didn't have a problem with brands or sponsors if its done tastefully. I think that Coke, Edy's, Dole, Kodak are all done very well since there aren't billboards or huge signs everywhere advertising those items.So how do you get past Coke, Edy's, Dole, Kodak and the hundreds of others that exist there? Starbucks is no different and I'm sure will not be any more obtrusive then the others.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.