Which one's the worst?

If there was one park you could close completly of,which would it be?


  • Total voters
    110

JIMINYCR

Well-Known Member
Either of the water parks, makes no difference to me, I dont go to WDW to play in pools. They take away my valuable park time. So I wouldnt miss either one.... except with one gone that might mean more people in line at a park.
 

beanbunny

Member
The post annoys me, too. I am tired of all the negativity but I think what burns me the most is posts saying to close a water park that they have never been to. How can you post closing something you have not experienced for yourself?
 

polynesiangirl

Well-Known Member
I am appalled at how many people voted for TL. You heartless monsters! ;)

I love TL. I'd take it over BB any day, but I like BB too.

If forced to choose one I guess it'd be the Studios, but only on the condition that it close for a park-wide refurb then reopen. Permanently losing any of these would be sad!
 

Matt_Black

Well-Known Member
Though some fingers, in some situations, are more useful than others.

WalkenOhYou2.jpg
 

Mukta

Well-Known Member
Hollywood Studios. The only thing I do in that whole park is the Great Movie Ride. I wouldn't be too sad if they closed that whole park.
 

The Empress Lilly

Well-Known Member
I couldn't do without EPCOT or the MK. Nor without DHS or River Country. It is unthinkable any one would not be there anymore.

The other parks range from good to great, but I guess when pressed Blizzard is the least indispensable to me.


Also, if you don't like a thread, then why bother visiting it and replying in it?
 

DManRightHere

Well-Known Member
I haven't voted, but I believe skewed results for adding the water parks! Unless people are not thinking of the future for hollywood studios...

EDIT: tisk tisk...so currently tied for typhoon lagoon and hollywood studios. Studios will be awesome one day. I hope soon!
 

ToInfinityAndBeyond

Well-Known Member
I wasn't complaining. I thought it was funny that someone assumed to know what someone else's purpose in doing something was, and then managed to complain through his own assumptions.

Ironic, considering you were the one making assumptions about a post that you claim was making assumptions. Projection much?
 

mergatroid

Well-Known Member
Ok I think I'm going to try to get rid of this thread because the way I explained the thread was not what I meant to post in the original post.Sorry please don't be mad.Thank you!:brb:

Don't worry, I don't think anyone is mad with you. Sometimes on here people go to extremes either saying everything at Disney is garbage or everything at Disney is great and nobody should ever say anything negative. The way you maybe worded your post at first seemed to sound like you were being deliberately negative when you probably weren't. That's the thing with the internet, you word something slightly wrong and people take it a different way than it was originally meant.

Anyhow don't worry and enjoy posting.
 

epcotisbest

Well-Known Member
Don't worry, I don't think anyone is mad with you. Sometimes on here people go to extremes either saying everything at Disney is garbage or everything at Disney is great and nobody should ever say anything negative. The way you maybe worded your post at first seemed to sound like you were being deliberately negative when you probably weren't. That's the thing with the internet, you word something slightly wrong and people take it a different way than it was originally meant.

Anyhow don't worry and enjoy posting.

So, just what are you trying to say? That seems positively negative. Or is it negatively positive?
 

EpcoTim

Well-Known Member
Ironic, considering you were the one making assumptions about a post that you claim was making assumptions. Projection much?

Except I wasn't making any assumptions. You clearly stated that this thread has no purpose; which assumes you knew what the posters intent was. No projection required.

I mean, I understand that we like to be critical and have high expectations on this board, but this thread has no purpose. Which one is the worst? Why not: "which one could use the most improvement?"

WDW may not be as impressive to some as it was in the 90's, but this is so silly.

You took a simple question and decided to twist it so you could make your own little passive-aggressive rant. His wording may not have met your standards but that doesn't mean it was a dig at Disney.
 

ToInfinityAndBeyond

Well-Known Member
Except I wasn't making any assumptions. You clearly stated that this thread has no purpose; which assumes you knew what the posters intent was. No projection required.

You took a simple question and decided to twist it so you could make your own little passive-aggressive rant. His wording may not have met your standards but that doesn't mean it was a dig at Disney.

The one making assumptions is you, my friend, the irony of which has been keenly pointed out in subsequent posts by other users. But I digress, for the OP has come out and stated that they did not intend for the thread's question to mean what it stated. They've also asked us to not be mad, so let's get along, okay? Hug?
 

TXDisney

Well-Known Member
If have to say both water parks. I've only been to each once but wasn't impressed. I'd rather just stay at the resort pool and relax for a lower key day. But if I were to have to choose between the 4 parks I'd say Hollywood studios. It's my least favorite, but I know it's a lot of peoples favorite.
 

EpcoTim

Well-Known Member
The one making assumptions is you, my friend, the irony of which has been keenly pointed out in subsequent posts by other users. But I digress, for the OP has come out and stated that they did not intend for the thread's question to mean what it stated. They've also asked us to not be mad, so let's get along, okay? Hug?

Grade A on the gloss over and skirting the issue.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom