What do you think Walt would have never done or stood for in todays Disney World. Do you think current management is being a good steward of Disney.
I think there should be more Disney Movie rides at DHS. What better way to promote your own movies than rides/shows dedicated to them.I think more of his Disney movies and characters would have been incorporated into the parks.
I think he would have kept the focus on the parks and movies and not have the company branching into areas outside of it . Hard to say maybe he would have. I bet he would have kept 20,000 leagues under the sea.
The TV contract helped finance DL....I think more of his Disney movies and characters would have been incorporated into the parks.
I think he would have kept the focus on the parks and movies and not have the company branching into areas outside of it . Hard to say maybe he would have. I bet he would have kept 20,000 leagues under the sea.
I think he would have been upset with the removal of attractions from MK over the years. In interviews at the start of the Florida project, Walt expressed excitement about "the blessing of size" the property embodied -- something Disneyland never had. The disappearance of so many MK attractions doesn't make much sense in regard to the available real estate. Growth in MK should have always been about additions, never replacements.
Well, I have to partially disagree. He only meant the Florida project to have ONE theme park. No one knows if he ever would have built DHS or AK. And of course, EPCOT was supposed to be a small city where people who worked on property actually lived.I think he would have been upset with the removal of attractions from MK over the years. In interviews at the start of the Florida project, Walt expressed excitement about "the blessing of size" the property embodied -- something Disneyland never had. The disappearance of so many MK attractions doesn't make much sense in regard to the available real estate. Growth in MK should have always been about additions, never replacements.
That's easy. If the guy was alive today he would have no opinion because the company would no longer exist.
Why? What's wrong with it? I like the new lobby. So to each his/her own.I agree, I bet he would have never approved the POLY lobby refurb the way they did it.
It doesn't make sense to have more to see and do than any family could ever ACTUALLY ever see and do.I think he would have been upset with the removal of attractions from MK over the years. In interviews at the start of the Florida project, Walt expressed excitement about "the blessing of size" the property embodied -- something Disneyland never had. The disappearance of so many MK attractions doesn't make much sense in regard to the available real estate. Growth in MK should have always been about additions, never replacements.
No. It's objectively terrible. You're wrong and I hate you.Why? What's wrong with it? I like the new lobby. So to each his/her own.
Well, I have to partially disagree. He only meant the Florida project to have ONE theme park. No one knows if he ever would have built DHS or AK. And of course, EPCOT was supposed to be a small city where people who worked on property actually lived.
So if that was all true, then yes, he probably would've added more to MK, since it would the only theme park there.
C'mon. At least have ONE real reason.No. It's objectively terrible. You're wrong and I hate you.
True, but who knows what might have happened had he lived for 20 more years. If he had his way, then current EPCOT, DHS, and AK probably would never have happened.EPCOT seems to not have moved in that direction at all.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.