Kram Sacul
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- Yes
Coruscant would only work indoors under a projection dome. In other words you’ll never see it.
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
What planet would you replace Batuu at Disneyland?
- Thread starter lifeisgoodboy
- Start date
- Status
Old Mouseketeer
Well-Known Member
Epcot_Imagineer
Well-Known Member
Honestly, I would appreciate a Coruscant-esque area in the style of Epcot's Mexico Pavilion. A large building with some projection mapping technology for the ceiling to add height, some faux buildings, some forced perspective tricks... I think it could work. Now will that ever happen? Absolutely not, but I can dream can't I?
socalifornian
Well-Known Member
All the walkways should look like bridges and/or floating platforms with a ton of city above and below. Real buildings could go up then I’m sure some tricks could be used below. But then nothing is realistically connected via a walking path unless the entire land is the Jedi Temple etc. There also needs to be speeder traffic. A bunch of larger dressed drones flying in freeway-like patterns for up to 16 hours? I wish
A system that has bodies of water and iconic buildings on dry land might look the best. Naboo?
A system that has bodies of water and iconic buildings on dry land might look the best. Naboo?
TROR
Well-Known Member
Let's face it, none of the planets would ever work in a theme park. There's far too much working against them being pleasant or realistic. That's part of what makes Batuu so stupid. WDI had a chance to design a planet perfect for a theme park that would be pleasant, realistic, and feel like Star Wars, and yet they blew it. It's a shame, really.
mickEblu
Well-Known Member
I think Endor could have worked. Then one issue would be it being too similar to Grizzly Peak or Critter Country but it could be Avoided with good design/ theming
or maybe have a theme park with most of the star was world in it without disney.
TROR
Well-Known Member
I don't care what any of you nerds say, none of the prominent worlds in Star Wars are nice (with the exception of Endor) and wouldn't be pleasant places to escape to. Theme parks, like movies, should offer escapism from the real world. Seeing run down, miserable, dumps for the price of $125 is not good!
I like star wars but I am not a nerd. It sounds like your mad at disney for not making your dreams come true. Not all theme parks are going to be nice. I think the worst parks are the zoos and the aquarium. They have small cages and spaces for these animals. Some of the animals are big and need a lot of space.
Kram Sacul
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- Yes
Why does a Star Wars planet have to be pleasant? Maybe they should’ve given us the planet with the bugs, Geonosis.
TROR
Well-Known Member
A Star Wars planet doesn't, but a land in Disneyland does.
They should use the bugs from the land they demolished for marvel land.
They should of put all this stuff in the land.
Here is a pdf of most eisley.
Here is a pdf of most eisley.
solidyne
Well-Known Member
This document, presumably a gamers manual, is amazing (or hilarious ... from a different point of view). It goes to show how a little imagination can make any locale interesting and fun.
Plus, I'd like to see a side-by-side of Oga's and the cantina on page 54 of the pdf (53 of the original document).
TP2000
Well-Known Member
I don't need a different planet. I just need what Disney's senior executives said we would have in this land during the 2015-2017 timeframe when they were talking openly about how cutting edge and IMMERSIVE! this new land would be.
They lied.
I just need senior Disney executives to stop being liars and bring back all the stuff they said the land would have; roaming droids, bizarre aliens, interactive bounty hunters who know you suck at flying the Millennium Falcon, stunt shows, etc., etc.
They lied.
I just need senior Disney executives to stop being liars and bring back all the stuff they said the land would have; roaming droids, bizarre aliens, interactive bounty hunters who know you suck at flying the Millennium Falcon, stunt shows, etc., etc.
Jedi Stitch
Well-Known Member
Like all of the lands even the original park land, just give it time. Every land over time became better, added attractions, rides, and merch/food. Granted Tomorrow land had the issue of tomorrow always becoming today, so it is hard to keep sci-fi from becoming non-fiction. They will add as they find a new way to bank money.
Phroobar
Well-Known Member
I don't think they lied because the infrastructure for that stuff is there. It was TDA entertainment that cut those things from the budget because, well, new senior executive Bob from accounting needed a new Telsa company car.I don't need a different planet. I just need what Disney's senior executives said we would have in this land during the 2015-2017 timeframe when they were talking openly about how cutting edge and IMMERSIVE! this new land would be.
They lied.
I just need senior Disney executives to stop being liars and bring back all the stuff they said the land would have; roaming droids, bizarre aliens, interactive bounty hunters who know you suck at flying the Millennium Falcon, stunt shows, etc., etc.
Your entire pitch is to just create mock-ups of film locations that you can, what, walk through like the houses in Toon Town? I mean, seriously, what is fun about that? None of your specific ideas for rides or attractions actually work.
A version of Tatooine could have worked, but just name-checking a laundry list of locations is not a sustainable or remotely interesting idea.
- Status