What are your feelings on WDW's Space Mountain

Please select the comments that you agree with (select as many as you would like)


  • Total voters
    248
  • Poll closed .

marni1971

Park History nut
Premium Member
jaredliu - someones been reading the press releases! DLP`s has most of this, but unfortunately as in Mission One if you don`t keep the effects working it becomes a dark ride in the literal sense, with a few props along the way. There is so much scope for the Floridian Mountain as-is with a good rehab, and the budget to sustain it. BTW - are there any other totally indoor twin track coasters anywhere?
 

DonaldD1987

Member
I like space mountain. It is a classic ride in WDW. It is still one of teir major headliner attraction. SO they shouldnt change it untill people start to loose interest in it which I dont think that will be for a while because it is a good rollercoaster for all different types of ages.
 

Slipknot

Well-Known Member
DonaldD1987 said:
I like space mountain. It is a classic ride in WDW. It is still one of teir major headliner attraction. SO they shouldnt change it untill people start to loose interest in it which I dont think that will be for a while because it is a good rollercoaster for all different types of ages.

Almost every time I get off SM, I hear people in the exit queue complaining about how rough it is and how it could be much better.
 

Shaman

Well-Known Member
Lee said:
As I have said before....

Gut it, and give it the kind of state-of-the-art ride experience it deserves.

:D And I'll agree with you again....:lol:

Other: WDW's should be more like Paris'...with the exception that it should be BETTER...in fact the BEST...of all Space Mountains....give it a launch, loops, effects...etc...They have the space, so there isn't an excuse for why the can't or shouldn't do it....

I think they should also repaint the outside of that building, make it more Sci-Fi...

Just some thoughts.
 

sleepybear

New Member
It seems so many of you want Space Mountain to be like RNRC, but what's the point? If you want RNRC, then ride go to MGM and ride it! Yes, Space Mountain is cheesy by today's standards, but so is the original "Star Wars" movie, and millions still love it.

So fix the things that need fixing. More themeing would be wonderful. But gutting it and turning it into another RNRC would do nothing but turn something that is classic and unique into another thrill-ride du jour.
 

Shaman

Well-Known Member
sleepybear said:
It seems so many of you want Space Mountain to be like RNRC, but what's the point? If you want RNRC, then ride go to MGM and ride it! Yes, Space Mountain is cheesy by today's standards, but so is the original "Star Wars" movie, and millions still love it.

So fix the things that need fixing. More themeing would be wonderful. But gutting it and turning it into another RNRC would do nothing but turn something that is classic and unique into another thrill-ride du jour.

DLP's Space Mountain is NOTHING like RNRC...at least thats not the impression I get (I wouldn't know for sure since I haven't ridden it)....so to compare the two does not make sense to me.
 

se8472

Well-Known Member
Slade said:
Almost every time I get off SM, I hear people in the exit queue complaining about how rough it is and how it could be much better.

For real? Its rare that I hear that and I am in the queue all day. All I hear was how great it was.
 

Epcot82Guy

Well-Known Member
I agree with that. I rarely have heard people complain.

ANyway, I ABSOLUTELY do not think WDW's SM should be replaced with a launched version ala DLP. I am a HUGE coaster entusiast, and that actually has a lot to do with why I think.

1. Those coasters dramatically decrease who can ride them
2. It destroys the "nostalgic" following which SM has.
3. State of the Art rides that focus on elements for thrills become dated VERY quickly. Name one coaster built as a state-of-the-art coaster designed around elements that has lasted over 20 years at any park. Coasters like the Arrow coaster of the 80's, the original inverteds, stand-ups, etc. ALL have lost popularity dramatically because new technology gets bigger, faster, smoother, more inverted, etc.
4. Darkness does not enhance major elements. It accents quick, sharp movements. The body realizes it is inverting because it is done smoothly and over time. A quick hair-pin is disorienting in the dark.

Having said that, I really like to concept of Rockit Moutain, but I would take it a step farther.

I would keep Space Mountain, Mission Alpha during the day. This is the FULL dark ride. The biggest problem IMHO is that the ride is too bright inside. So, enclose the queue's roof and add windows, and re-do the starfield effect to make it truly dark. The lift hill area could use some new themeing majorly, and tie in the TTA more. Also, as someone said, replace this with a "slow" LIM launch at the same speed. Then, in evening, making it Space Mountain, Mission Omega. Since the attraction has been darkened, no one sees all of the new screens and props installed during the day. Install new trains with the same basic layout but that have basic LIM capabilities. Also, increase their padding and make better wheels to withstand a faster ride. You enter the tunnel just as before and start going up the lift hill. Halfway up the hill, however, a "power failure" hits the station, and you are lowered back down the hill to return to base. However, just before the bottom, a "comet" comes up and forces your train up the lift (not extremely fast, but enough to make the entire attraction faster). You then fly on the comet through asteroid fields, etc. (done with the screen technology that is now used instead of just being dark during the day). The base is trying to reach you to get you off the comet, and, eventually, another asteroid knocks the comet off of you (last effect), and you are grabbed in hyperspace by the base just before being pummelled by additional asteroids. This is the final entry tunnel that is moved to the very last bit of the ride (wihtout the middle "dark portion"). I personally would suggest a more adventure-full-score style soundtrack rather than rock and roll (hence the reason for not alling it Rockit Mountain) that goes with the elements. The day version is more classic SM and is broadcast constantly instead of on-ride.
 

lilphil6487

New Member
To be honest, i love the scenery. This ride is probably the only ride in disney (in my opinion) that has remained the same. All of that themeing reminds me of the old tomorrowland. I loved how it used to look. I miss all of the old stuff like Horizons, World of Motion, etc. that offered theming similar to that, and they are all gone. if they took away that scenery, it will be gone forever. I miss all the old stuff and im not even that old. Fixing the track and sounds would be good, but nothing else, and maybe anamatronic characters instead of manakins. I like Space Mountain the way it is. Just my opinion
 

coasterphil

Well-Known Member
Changing it to be more like SM at DLP or more like RnRC would be ridiculous. I think it definitely could use some smoothing out and they could rework the ride layout a little bit, keeping the focus on quick drops and sharp turns though. The theming on the ride itself could also use an upgrade.
 

ctwhalerman

New Member
Space Mountain is a classic, hands-down. The ride itself is fine, though it needs to be darker and maybe a bit less bumpier. The thing that really needs to be changed is the post-ride exit on the moving platform. That Fed-Ex thing, which is probably gone now but I'm not sure, was a new low for commercials in the parks. If Disney could think of something worthwhile in this area, from both the platform and the Peoplemover, the whole ride would be just fine.
 

Woody13

New Member
I rode SM with my 9 year old son when the ride had the old seats! That was not a fun experience. Since that time, I think I've been on SM 3 other times. Let's hope they gut SM, CoP and Indy Speedway and use the room for a few E-ticket meet and greets!
 

marni1971

Park History nut
Premium Member
I`m against enclosing the queue - when you look down on it at the top of the lifts you get a sense of how high you are, and when queing it gives a greater sense of aniticipation. However, I`d go back to the original darker lighting for it, and use more focussed downlights on the load platform (these used to work well, but I guess were too dark originally for health and safety) - the load area is covered anyway so its not too difficult.
 

Edeyore

New Member
I actually like just about all of the Disney coasters. I have gone to Six Flags and a few other places and I just do not like the plain, outdoor, unthemed coasters. Part of it I am sure is that it takes my mind off of my fear of coasters. I know Space Mountain is a fairly simple coaster, but I really like it, and I love Rock n' Roll Rollercoaster.
 

se8472

Well-Known Member
objr said:
Maybe we need videos of both WDW and DLP Space Mountains to compare...

You can't really compare the two. They are two different types of coasters, the only thing they share is the name.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom