We have removed four items involving Tic-Toc from our shelves for the time being.
1. Tic-Toc is a crocodile.
2. He never attacked children. He helps Peter chase off the bad guy, and as a result, the children are set free. He should be labeled as a
friend of the children.
3. Once again, he is a crocodile...a relative to the alligator, but not an alligator. Are we going to start removing Dalmatian or Lady/Tramp apparel if a wolf attacks someone?
4. It was respectful for Disney to remove any JC jokes involving alligators, or children being fed to alligators. I get why those needed to go temporarily. That was a sensible move, and will allow time for public healing from this tragedy. But removing Tic-Toc's likeness from the premises is (imo) going a bit too far.
5. The same can be said for Louis from Princess & The Frog. Yes, he is an alligator, but he is also a non-aggressor. He just wants to play jazz with the Big Boys.
6. What message is Disney sending by eradicating a good-hearted, non-aggressive gator, and a heroic, pirate-defeating crocodile, when neither of these fictitious characters had anything to do with the GF tragedy?
7. Doesn't this all sorta go against the Zootopian message of not painting all animals with the same brush, based on the actions of one or a few?
8. Wouldn't it be a lot more respectful for the victim's family to simply put up "
Do Not Feed Wildlife" signs / warnings at bungalows & other areas, so future guests do not make the same mistakes which led to this gator approaching humans easily?
9. Wouldn't making necessary changes in policy, guest protection, and guest awareness be much more effective than demonizing cartoon critters which never threatened children during their respective stories?
10. Not sure what to put here for #10. But just needed a solid even number to wrap it up.