WDW Performer Arrested on Child Charges

[BiggerTigger]

I think BiggerTigger was trying to point out the rather odd coincidence that two men playing the same character at different times have been accused/arrested for similar crimes. Like there's something about the Beast that brings out the...well, you know...in certain guys.

Thank you slappy magoo. That and also the quote from the person who said he should do his time and then go work on broadway. Well, obviously no one is safe there either.

On another note, I find it funny that the word S.e.x. is blocked out but the word is not.:ROFLOL:

 

[Pan]

I Say We Kill the Beast!!!

 

[Pumbas Nakasak]

I Say We Kill the Beast!!!

No need hes going to roadie for the Who.

 

[PhotoDave219]

No need hes going to roadie for the Who.

Wont get fooled again, eh?

 

[Pumbas Nakasak]

Wont get fooled again, eh?

Not buy Pete at least:drevil:

 

[joshwill]

*sits back, grabs some popcorn, and awaits the, "This wouldn't be in the news if it wasn't Disney," posts to start flowing in*

Purely disgusting.

its always news when something this disturbing happens. however, from what ive seen, unless it is a major bust, its usually just a local story, the fact that it was a disney CM made it more newsworthy on a national level as was noted in a previous post by someone in CT.

 

[joshwill]

Ever look at the ______ offender registry?

I'm more creeped out about who I have in a 2 miles radius of me.

blank offenders....

since when is es e ex a dirty word? i think thats carrying the censorship bit, yes i know its needed here somewhat as its a "family" oriented site, a bit overboard.

 

[unkadug]

blank offenders....

since when is es e ex a dirty word? i think thats carrying the censorship bit, yes i know its needed here somewhat as its a "family" oriented site, a bit overboard.

The program will just search and remove. It doesn't matter the what the context is!

If you own a company that transports goods in trucks, you still can't say that you have a tr__________g company! :lol:

 

[kennyj29]

:wave: If this is true, doesnt disney screen employees? also, imagine the girl that played Beauty,too.!!!! poor thing.

When people get new jobs do they normally go to your house and check your computer to see if you have child ?

 

[unkadug]

When people get new jobs do they normally go to your house and check your computer to see if you have child ?

The normal person will not have , much less child on their computer!

 

[Swat1]

There is alot of misquided information in this thread so I thought I would shed some light. I happen to have some insider information in this area as I am a special agent with a large three-letter federal law enforcement agency assigned to a child sexual exploitation unit. I investigate child ography, online enticement and coercion, child ______ travelers (interstate), child ______ tourism (foreign) and child ______ trafficking for a living.

knowing how so many child molestors were molested as children themselves, I never quite understand the bloodlust people have for making molestors suffer. Don't get me wrong, I'n not a total bleeding heart liberal. If this guy is guilty of owning kiddie , even if he's never personally abused a child (it's not like "merely" supporting child molestation is any better imho) he should be punished. I just don't derive any glee from it. It's a social responsibility, and people who get riled up and sensationalize issues like this only serve to enhance the perverted thrill molestors get from ther crimes.

"knowing so many child molesters were molested as children themselves..." Not true! I recently attended an international child sexual exploitation conference where I had the honor to see Joe Sullivan, a British authority on child ______ offenders. This issue was talked about directly as it is a common misperception. The Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (an organization in the UK devoted to stopping child sexual exploitation) recently commissioned a study regarding this very issue. The study found that within a population of child molesters they were no more likely to have been sexually abused as children than any other cross-section of the general public.

Has it ever been proven that looking at leads to sexual crime? I agree that since having child is a crime, the owner should be punished, but I don't think we should start jumping to conclusions about the safety of the woman who plays Belle, or the safety of the children in the parks. I have pictures of flowers stored in my computer. But I never buy cut flowers, and never cut any of the flowers in my yard. Shoot, I don't even smell them - I have too many allergies. This is America. People are innocent until proven guilty. He is charged with having child on his computer. He hasn't been charged with anything else, and hasn't been convicted of anything. Let's not start an modern day witch hunt here.

"Has it ever been proven that looking at leads to sexual crime?" When talking about child ography v.s. adult ography, the answer is an absolute and resounding "YES!" A study conducted by Dr. Andres C. Hernandez and published in a poster presentation entitled “Self Reported Contact Sexual Offenses by Participants in the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ ______ Offender Treatment Program: Implications for ______ Offenders” supports the notion that viewing child ography is likely to lead to contact offenses involving a child. The study showed that, of the inmates who elected to participate in the Federal Bureau of Prisons ______ Offender Treatment Program, 76 percent of those who were convicted on charges related to Internet ______ crimes, such as possession of child ography or luring a child, had also committed sexual contact offenses against children. This conclusion was based on polygraph examinations of offenders who chose to enroll in Dr. Hernandez’s program. This link between viewing or possessing child ography and molesting a child has been demonstrated in other studies as well, including one conducted by the United States Postal Inspection Service beginning in 1997. This study found that 33 percent of the 2,433 individuals arrested by USPIS agents since 1997 for using the U.S. mail and the Internet for the sexual exploitation of children had molested children. These findings are alarming and lend credence to the notice that exposure to images of child ography can, in fact, create child molesters, and hence, result in more child-victims. (Another ongoing study in the Netherlands supports the above-mentioned studies).



In 2005 study commissioned by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), the Crimes Against Children Research Center and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Programs (OJJDP), titled, "Child ography Possessors Arrested in Internet-Related Crimes: Findings from the National Juvenile Online Victimization Study,"

Hate to say it, but it doesn't matter. The article said he had a squeaky clean record. That's what's scary. A lot of people get away with a lot for a long time and they're never caught. Disney could've screened him til they're blue in the face, but there would've been nothing tipping them off about this guy because of his clean record. At least the roomie had the grapefruits to say something to the cops.

Exactly, we often find that these individuals have no previous criminal records. I have worked cases involving teachers, preachers, boy scout leaders, soccer coaches, softball coaches, etc. One teacher had been at the elementary school he was working at for 15 years and was beloved. Little did anyone know he had a hard core child ography addiction and had created child ography using several different students.

Or maybe you have a child sharing your computer.

I'm not being faceitious, it's a perfectly reasonable scenario. Teenage boy shares a computer with his dad. An Underage classmate of boy who's a little on the promiscuous side sends the boy a suggestive picture. Boy keeps the image on the computer, tucked away in a sub sub sub sub sub folder because what teenage boy wouldn't want a dirty picture from a girl in school? Dad doesn't know about it, computer needs repair, tech starts looking around, and boom, cannon fodder for the local news.

Granted, not a likely scenairo, but we as a nation get in trouble when we refuse to acknowledge grey areas, in fact, go out of our way to ignore them. THinking in aboslutes can be dangerous.

We have had this happen (yes it is very rare) but have determined it to be case through investigative means. It is as important, if not more so, to clear the innocent as it is to convict the guilty. We have to look at ourselves in the mirror and sleep at night too.

I wanted to finish with just a couple of things:

1) Many people do not know what child ography (CP) is. Many think of CP as something out of an underwear catalogue or just nude children. Well let me tell you that is far from the case. We only prosecute cases involving prepubescent children (unless the specific child can be positively identified). From my experience, most CP cases I have worked involved children between the ages of 5 and 10 yrs old. I have seen images and videos of infants and toddlers being sexually abused, forced to orally copulate adult males, being penetrated by adult males, etc. Often we find CP that depicts sado-masochistic violence, bondage and/or torture. CP is horrendous, gut-wrenching and you can never unring the bell (once you see it there is no unseeing it).

In a 2005 study commissioned by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, the Crimes Against Children Research Center and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Program, titled, "Child ography Possessors Arrested in Internet-Related Crimes," the study found that:

Almost all arrested CP possessors were male, 91% were white, and 86% were
older than 25. Only 3% were younger than 18.
​

​

​

Most had images of prepubescent children (83%) and images graphically depicting sexual penetration (80%).
​

​

Approximately 1 in 5 arrested CP possessors (21%) had images depicting sexual violence to children such as bondage, rape, and torture.
​

​

39% had at least 1 video with moving images of child ography.​

​

31% arose as cases of child sexual victimization,

This study can be found at http://www.missingkids.com/en_US/publications/NC144.pdf

Swat1*​

 

[slappy magoo]

The normal person will not have , much less child on their computer!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


No, seriously you're right. The "normal" person won't ever be interested in adult ography, won't look it up, certainly not keep it on a computer or in the house, laws, no. Why, for a normal person to be interested in ography, he or she would have to find ographic images interesting or stimulating. The fact that ography bis a struggling dying business proves this...


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Is it hard to drive or open up pickle jars when you've got one finger constantly on the pulse of the nation like that?

 

[Senderella]

Has there been anything new going on with this case? I haven't seen anything about it on the news because of the Anna Nicole Smith trainwreck dominating what seems like every ounce of spare news space available.

 

[Mori Anne]

There is alot of misquided information in this thread so I thought I would shed some light..................

Swat1*​

Thanks for all your hardwork catching these people. You seem very knowledgable and factual. I appriciate your work catching and taking down these people. You get'm Tiger!!!! :sohappy: :sohappy: :sohappy: :sohappy: :sohappy: :sohappy: :sohappy: :sohappy:

 

[BiggerTigger]

The normal person will not have , much less child on their computer!

Someone must be listening to Avenue Q.:ROFLOL:

http://www.avenueq.com/videoclips.html

 

[Mori Anne]

There is alot of misquided information......
Swat1*

Hey Swat1, I just sent you a PM.

 

[Swat1]

Pm

Replied

Swat1*

 

[MAF]

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


No, seriously you're right. The "normal" person won't ever be interested in adult ography, won't look it up, certainly not keep it on a computer or in the house, laws, no. Why, for a normal person to be interested in ography, he or she would have to find ographic images interesting or stimulating. The fact that ography bis a struggling dying business proves this...


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Is it hard to drive or open up pickle jars when you've got one finger constantly on the pulse of the nation like that?

Haha I thought that post was a little ridiculous as well. Who are these "normal" people he is speaking of? lol...

 

[unkadug]

OK folks, maybe that did come out wrong. :hammer:

Maybe I should have specified "incriminating and illegal"