PhotoDave219
Well-Known Member
......
:wave: If this is true, doesnt disney screen employees? also, imagine the girl that played Beauty,too.!!!!poor thing.
:wave: If this is true, doesnt disney screen employees? also, imagine the girl that played Beauty,too.!!!!poor thing.
Sadly, Disney does not screen every employee.:wave: If this is true, doesnt disney screen employees? also, imagine the girl that played Beauty,too.!!!!poor thing.
There must be something with The Beast.He's a performer...So send him to Broadway and put him in another production that is not something kids would go see. (after the punishment and rehab)
knowing how so many child molestors were molested as children themselves, I never quite understand the bloodlust people have for making molestors suffer. Don't get me wrong, I'n not a total bleeding heart liberal. If this guy is guilty of owning kiddie , even if he's never personally abused a child (it's not like "merely" supporting child molestation is any better imho) he should be punished. I just don't derive any glee from it. It's a social responsibility, and people who get riled up and sensationalize issues like this only serve to enhance the perverted thrill molestors get from ther crimes.
I totally agree. These people are just so much sicker in the heads and cannot be cured, no matter how many idiot psychologists say they can be.IMO the offender should be prosecuted to the fullest extent possible. I'd have more respect for a murderer than this guy.
Sounds like everyone is trying to say the right thing. Lets not forget that possessing child is a CRIME. If you consider that he had the , he was in effect saying that he approves of child molestation. The child/children in the certainly weren't having the time of their lives, and if he didn't buy it, circulate it etc...the market for that type of thing would go away. Some crimes don't need the benefit of the doubt, he is guilty of possessing child . He is guilty. He should be locked up forever on that crime alone, period, end of story.Has it ever been proven that looking at leads to sexual crime? I agree that since having child is a crime, the owner should be punished, but I don't think we should start jumping to conclusions about the safety of the woman who plays Belle, or the safety of the children in the parks. I have pictures of flowers stored in my computer. But I never buy cut flowers, and never cut any of the flowers in my yard. Shoot, I don't even smell them - I have too many allergies. This is America. People are innocent until proven guilty. He is charged with having child on his computer. He hasn't been charged with anything else, and hasn't been convicted of anything. Let's not start an modern day witch hunt here.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.