Walt Disney board extends Iger's contract as Chairman and CEO through June 2018

Ranch Dressing

Well-Known Member
Perhaps for those not in it for the long haul. Short term profits at the expense of the future.

Thats total baloney. Just about every acquisition Iger has made will pan out long term and grow the company dramatically. The man is building theme parks while the late to the party competition is building themed areas. Disney films are getting to the point of being constant hits almost every time out. The brand has never been stronger, even when Walt was around he was never this successful.

Short term? Ha, ha. Did I mention the company under his watch has grown in value from just under 50 billion to 150 billion? You guys can hate the man all you want, its pointless and without merit, but hes the best CEO in America for a reason. He deserves his success.
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
The brand has never been stronger, even when Walt was around he was never this successful.

The company Walt ran was nothing like it is today. No foreign parks, no retail chain, no cable networks, no internet-related items, no WDW (yet), one park in Califonria, no Pixar etc. Comparing the two from a "success" standpoint would be ridiculous.

And Eisner more than Iger was responsible for all of that.
 

Mike S

Well-Known Member
Thats total baloney. Just about every acquisition Iger has made will pan out long term and grow the company dramatically. The man is building theme parks while the late to the party competition is building themed areas. Disney films are getting to the point of being constant hits almost every time out. The brand has never been stronger, even when Walt was around he was never this successful.

Short term? Ha, ha. Did I mention the company under his watch has grown in value from just under 50 billion to 150 billion? You guys can hate the man all you want, its pointless and without merit, but hes the best CEO in America for a reason. He deserves his success.
He's building a theme park. Unless another one has been announced since Shanghai.
 

GrumpyFan

Well-Known Member
Thats total baloney. Just about every acquisition Iger has made will pan out long term and grow the company dramatically. The man is building theme parks while the late to the party competition is building themed areas. Disney films are getting to the point of being constant hits almost every time out. The brand has never been stronger, even when Walt was around he was never this successful.

Short term? Ha, ha. Did I mention the company under his watch has grown in value from just under 50 billion to 150 billion? You guys can hate the man all you want, its pointless and without merit, but hes the best CEO in America for a reason. He deserves his success.

I have to agree with you. Not that I'm an Iger cheerleader or anything like that, but he's done quite a bit for the company in his time.

Granted, he hasn't done the kind of building and massive park expansions at WDW and across the world as Eisner did, but consider also, that he hasn't been in charge as long as Eisner was, but he's done a lot from a profitability standpoint, which is no doubt why they've decided to keep him.

Michael Eisner had over 20 years at the helm, from 1984 until 2004/5. Bob Iger was only appointed in 2005 as CEO, but during his short time, he's done some MAJOR things that should be recognized.

Most notably I think, he restored the relationship with Pixar, bought the company partnering with Steve Jobs, and bringing John Lasseter on board to help restore animation and imagineering. Michael Eisner, in his greedy dictatorship tried to milk Pixar for every single dime, and ultimately pushed them to the point of where they were looking for another studio to distribute their films. Bob was able to talk to them and form a new, very equitable and successful relationship that's paid off hugely for both companies.

He also bought Marvel, which was a huge deal financially, and will continue to have pay offs for many years to come.
I should also mention the mega deal he made with George Lucas, that will undoubtedly have equally, if not a bigger payoff.

Also of note, he bought back the Disney Stores from Children's place. This was another of Eisner's disastrous decisions, that luckily Iger had the intelligence to see that it just made sense for Disney to own the stores branded with their own name.

So, while he hasn't been as extravagant as Michael Eisner was in his term, Bob has had a few hits in his short term. If nothing else, I think Iger should be remembered for fixing some of the mistakes of the Eisner era.
 

SirLink

Well-Known Member
Thats total baloney. Just about every acquisition Iger has made will pan out long term and grow the company dramatically. The man is building theme parks while the late to the party competition is building themed areas. Disney films are getting to the point of being constant hits almost every time out. The brand has never been stronger, even when Walt was around he was never this successful.

Short term? Ha, ha. Did I mention the company under his watch has grown in value from just under 50 billion to 150 billion? You guys can hate the man all you want, its pointless and without merit, but hes the best CEO in America for a reason. He deserves his success.

I had a long post but clearly you have earned your $8 p.h. to type that.
 

GrumpyFan

Well-Known Member
That should give him time to finish what he started...the downfall of WDW.

This is such B-S! WDW is not crumbling, nor is Iger trying to bring about its downfall.

People seem to think that Iger, Staggs & Rasulo can just write checks for whatever they please and have it built overnight. Well, that's not how things work in the real world. Sure, it would be nice, but it's not realistic. One of the reasons why Iger is keeping his job is that he's making lots of money for the company with his so-called conservative style of business decisions. Although, I wouldn't call purchasing Marvel and Lucas conservative at all.

Again, not trying to be an Iger cheerleader, but I think he's a smart business man. He's not a big risk taker, but he seems to like forming partnerships where there is another entity that has the "steam" or the current popularity with the public (Marvel, Lucas, Avatar). In some way its like an investor who diversifies their portfolio, not putting all his eggs in one basket.

But to say he's bringing about the downfall, totally ignores everything that's happening right now, with construction going on or scheduled for every one of the 4 major parks and a complete re-build of DTD. I just don't get how that can be considered "downfall"!
 
Last edited:

CDavid

Well-Known Member
Thats total baloney. Just about every acquisition Iger has made will pan out long term and grow the company dramatically. The man is building theme parks while the late to the party competition is building themed areas. Disney films are getting to the point of being constant hits almost every time out. The brand has never been stronger, even when Walt was around he was never this successful.

Short term? Ha, ha. Did I mention the company under his watch has grown in value from just under 50 billion to 150 billion? You guys can hate the man all you want, its pointless and without merit, but hes the best CEO in America for a reason. He deserves his success.

Iger is good for the current stock holders and for the company in general (though there are potential long-term problems). However, it has clearly been demonstrated that Iger is very bad for Parks & resorts, which is the division of The Walt Disney Company we are primarily concerned with here.

I'm trying to put a positive spin on this.

Why? Let Iger's failures with the parks speak for themselves; Disney has plenty of people - and fanboys - eager to spin things and defend every little decision.
 

Adam N

Well-Known Member
Sorry to branch a little off topic, but do you think the DHS announcement will be made soon? Giving Iger an opportunity to make this announcement himself or something? This kind of expansion feels bigger than Staggs would announce. Who made the original announcement for NFL and DCA 2.0?
 

MichWolv

Born Modest. Wore Off.
Premium Member
I'm only surprised at this because I thought Iger wanted to step down. For the owners of the company, Iger has been a very successful CEO. The stock price is up about 350% since he took over, I think. Not a bad return for 9 years.

The Pixar and Marvel acquisitions already look like steals, and the LucasFilm acquisition may well look like one soon.
ESPN was a juggernaut in the sports world when Iger came on as CEO -- now it's basically an all-powerful dictator with a license to print money.
Feature animation (non-Pixar) has it's biggest hit in 2 decades.
The Cruise Line is the envy of the industry and new ships Iger greenlit tripled capacity (guest count, not number of ships, obviously)
DCA is now a huge success after previously looking like a failure.
The Shanghai park will cement Disney's brand in China even more than it already is.
While the movie side had historic busts in John Carter and Lone Ranger, those losses are more than covered by the surprise success of Guardians of the Galaxy (heck, just the profits from the sale of dancing Groot toys might cover it).

There are plenty of more examples of what has gone right under Iger that more than outweigh (for the company's owners) what has gone wrong. Is Iger good for WDW? Certainly not in the way I wish he was. But is good for the Company? He certainly has been up until now.
 

GrumpyFan

Well-Known Member
Iger is good for the current stock holders and for the company in general (though there are potential long-term problems). However, it has clearly been demonstrated that Iger is very bad for Parks & resorts, which is the division of The Walt Disney Company we are primarily concerned with here.

Why? Let Iger's failures with the parks speak for themselves; Disney has plenty of people - and fanboys - eager to spin things and defend every little decision.

Call me a fanboy if you like, but I haven't seen anything that would indicate the parks are failing? Please show what you're referring to.
Admittedly, they've slipped a little in market share, but they're still making money hand over fist, and still leading in those markets. So, where is it you see that Iger is bad for them?

I want to see more built and expansions as well, but to do it just for the sake of adding something new, can be dangerous, just look at Six Flags and all the trouble they've created for themselves. It must be done carefully and strategically, with much forethought and planning, or else we run the risk of a debacle like the former DCA, prior to its re-build.
 
Last edited:

SirLink

Well-Known Member
This is such B-S! WDW is not crumbling, nor is Iger trying to bring about its downfall.

People seem to think that Iger, Staggs & Rasulo can just write checks for whatever they please and have it built overnight. Well, that's not how things work in the real world. Sure, it would be nice, but it's not realistic. One of the reasons why Iger is keeping his job is that he's making lots of money for the company with his so-called conservative style of business decisions. Although, I wouldn't call purchasing Marvel and Lucas conservative at all.

But to say he's bringing about the downfall, totally ignores everything that's happening right now, with construction going on or scheduled for every one of the 4 major parks and a complete re-build of DTD. I just don't get how that can be considered "downfall"!

Iger may not be doing it intentionally, but he isn't doing a grand job of clearing house and getting hands on with P&R and "fixing" and firing the various incompetent fools at TDO and reshape its structure to act better.

Well Rasulo hated the parks with a deep passion - so I wouldn't expect to turn on a fire hose if a park was on fire. Secondly we can expect rides to be constructed in the least possible amount of time like the competition does. Short term profit vs long term. Marvel could of existed outside of Disney and would of made the same amount, same with Lucasfilm. They gutted the parts of Lucasfilm which could of given them long term profitability.

What construction is going on in MK, oh right, infrastructure and a band aid on its booboo. Epcot? The further toonification of Epcot of fictional places entering the equation ... yep. DAK the tall blue cat enclosure is what it is. DHS? No construction. DTD they are building a shopping centre....wow let us give him 4 golden stickers ... wait ... 5 golden stickers
 

rioriz

Well-Known Member
Convenient this will end right about the time WDW will more than likely see a renaissance of recent years (TPFKaDHS, AK expansion, Frozen ride, Disney Springs)
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom