Vote! Action

Vote!

  • Cardinals314

    Votes: 7 17.5%
  • ZapperZ

    Votes: 4 10.0%
  • nngrendel

    Votes: 7 17.5%
  • subhuman31

    Votes: 12 30.0%
  • fractal

    Votes: 10 25.0%

  • Total voters
    40
  • Poll closed .

Amber

6+4+3=2
Premium Member
Original Poster
Cardinals314
46970_2330805991617_1827699588_n.jpg


ZapperZ
IMG_1653_zpsbcf1dfef.jpg


subhuman31
P1030431_zpse4fdb11c.jpg
 
Last edited:

Cardinals314

Active Member
Fractal, your image has been modified using Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 on a macintosh. You modified it on August 27th at 22:41:54 and the image was created on July 24th. I checked it out on imageedited.com.
 

fractal

Well-Known Member
Fractal, your image has been modified using Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 on a macintosh. You modified it on August 27th at 22:41:54 and the image was created on July 24th. I checked it out on imageedited.com.


Boy, is that scary. You are correct, and my mistake. I have been editing pictures from my last trip (over 2,000) as I'm writing my trip report (mostly those shot in RAW). It is a time consuming and tedious task. As this was originally shot in JPG I didn't think it was edited. In fact, I purposely shot some pictures in JPG just so I could have some to enter in these contests.

I have previously pulled one of my photos out of a vote after I noticed that it was an edited. So, I have called myself out - but never anybody else ( despite seeing obvious editing ). As an aside - for those of us that shot mostly ( or all ) in RAW, this contest is becoming difficult if not impossible to participate in. Perhaps we should consider a "post processing" contest? The processing I do on a RAW file is just in place of the camera's processing that is done inside the camera to create a JPG file; but we've been down this road before.

I ask @AMH97 to withdraw my entry and btw, this is the shot out of the camera.

_DSC5367-L.jpg
 

MOXOMUMD

Well-Known Member
@fractal It's still an awesome shot. I agree maybe some posting changes possibly need to be made so the photoshop police are held at bay. I, myself, am happy to just be able to point and click. :)
 

nngrendel

Well-Known Member
I shoot all mine in RAW as well. However the shots I post here are just converted to JPEG. @fractal I think your shot should stay. Its a great shot and to me doesn't look as if its edited in a way that brings anything new from the original. I think his use of a 1.8 aperture is what gave this image its look. Not from Lightroom. If just converting from RAW to Jpeg disqualifies your entry please remove all of mine. Fractal has been here a very long time and has contributed many many great shots to this forum along with great travel advice.

I also think minor edits to highlights, exposure and temp is no big deal. Most labs do color correction during printing anyhow. I feel as long as things has not been removed, added or major enhancement like HDR ect then it should be okay. I know there needs to be a line drawn but this is crazy.

@Cardinals314 how do we know your image has not been edited at one point??
here is the info your image gave.

46970_2330805991617_1827699588_n.jpg
Photo has been taken from facebook. Facebook deletes the data we need to test if the image is original.
 

Cardinals314

Active Member
I shoot all mine in RAW as well. However the shots I post here are just converted to JPEG. @fractal I think your shot should stay. Its a great shot and to me doesn't look as if its edited in a way that brings anything new from the original. I think his use of a 1.8 aperture is what gave this image its look. Not from Lightroom. If just converting from RAW to Jpeg disqualifies your entry please remove all of mine. Fractal has been here a very long time and has contributed many many great shots to this forum along with great travel advice.

I also think minor edits to highlights, exposure and temp is no big deal. Most labs do color correction during printing anyhow. I feel as long as things has not been removed, added or major enhancement like HDR ect then it should be okay. I know there needs to be a line drawn but this is crazy.

@Cardinals314 how do we know your image has not been edited at one point??
here is the info your image gave.

46970_2330805991617_1827699588_n.jpg
Photo has been taken from facebook. Facebook deletes the data we need to test if the image is original.

I have no idea how to use photo editing. I can send you an email with the picture attached if you are dying to test it and see.
 
Last edited:

Amber

6+4+3=2
Premium Member
Original Poster
Here we go again.

IF a photo is not edited in any way (except re-sizing to meet the contest requirement) it is eligible for the contest. For those of you that do the RAW thing, that means you CAN enter your photo IF YOU TAKE IT DIRECTLY FROM THE CAMERA TO THE CONTEST. Any editing in between makes the photo NOT eligible to be entered.

We are on the honor system here. Please let's be civil to one another and play by the rules.

@fractal is pulling his photo from this contest as mentioned above. I can remove the photo, but not the poll option. Please do not vote for fractal's photo.
 

nngrendel

Well-Known Member
Pull mine too. All this whining about photo editing is ridiculous. Anyone who knows photography and knows photo editing should know his photo has not been enhanced to the point that is should not be allowed here at this contest which I remind you is JUST for FUN.

There is NO way to take a RAW image from a camera and post it straight to this contest. You have to convert it to JPEG some way. Photo contest in the past should have only allowed negatives as that's what I RAW image is. A Digital Negative.

@Cardinals314 I have no desire to be the Photoshop police in a Just for Fun photography contest. No one here ever won anything from this and its just a opportunity to showcase your work while at the most photogenic place on earth. If you knew anything about RAW you would understand there is no way to post it here and it be clean of all EXIF evidence of some kind of editing tool JUST from the conversion from RAW to JPEG acording to your "detective web site". (Trust me I tested it.) Doing such a conversion add NOTHING to the photo. Heck just adding a watermark is a edit.

I have always voted in this contest even when my shot was not up for the vote. Out of protest I remove mine too.
 

Cardinals314

Active Member
Pull mine too. All this whining about photo editing is ridiculous. Anyone who knows photography and knows photo editing should know his photo has not been enhanced to the point that is should not be allowed here at this contest which I remind you is JUST for FUN.

There is NO way to take a RAW image from a camera and post it straight to this contest. You have to convert it to JPEG some way. Photo contest in the past should have only allowed negatives as that's what I RAW image is. A Digital Negative.

@Cardinals314 I have no desire to be the Photoshop police in a Just for Fun photography contest. No one here ever won anything from this and its just a opportunity to showcase your work while at the most photogenic place on earth. If you knew anything about RAW you would understand there is no way to post it here and it be clean of all EXIF evidence of some kind of editing tool JUST from the conversion from RAW to JPEG acording to your "detective web site". (Trust me I tested it.) Doing such a conversion add NOTHING to the photo. Heck just adding a watermark is a edit.

I have always voted in this contest even when my shot was not up for the vote. Out of protest I remove mine too.

There are no issues with watermarks. I do have issues when people are using colorization methods on Adobe. Yes the picture information contained changes of the color. You can see it for yourself. The information talks about the changes in the Red, Green, and Blue matrices. Also the viewing cond illuminant, surround, and luminance have been edited. sRGB IEC 61966-2.1 was used for the photo. The colorization was what had me interested in the photo.
 

nngrendel

Well-Known Member
There are no issues with watermarks. I do have issues when people are using colorization methods on Adobe. Yes the picture information contained changes of the color. You can see it for yourself. The information talks about the changes in the Red, Green, and Blue matrices. Also the viewing cond illuminant, surround, and luminance have been edited. sRGB IEC 61966-2.1 was used for the photo. The colorization was what had me interested in the photo.


Still doesnt change his shot. You can enhance saturation in camera when you take the shot. No worries. You got your way and he has pulled his picture. Moving on...
 

Allen C

Well-Known Member
There are no issues with watermarks. I do have issues when people are using colorization methods on Adobe. Yes the picture information contained changes of the color. You can see it for yourself. The information talks about the changes in the Red, Green, and Blue matrices. Also the viewing cond illuminant, surround, and luminance have been edited. sRGB IEC 61966-2.1 was used for the photo. The colorization was what had me interested in the photo.

This got me scratching my head. What's your problem with the sRGB colorspace? It's the standard colorspace used for practically all color printers, monitors and the internet.

For someone who claims to know nothing about photo editing you seem to be very familiar with terms like color matrices, illuminant, surround, luminance and sRGB.
 
Last edited:

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom