PeterAlt
Well-Known Member
Wow. I'll just let that fester for a bit.I thought it was based on the voices in your head.
Wow. I'll just let that fester for a bit.I thought it was based on the voices in your head.
One thing I noticed was that the facade of Its a Small World at DL "fits in" thematically (style wise) to Alice in Wonderland. Maybe the two attractions can be built right next to each other (assuming the current IASW at WDW is taken out of its current space).A ride like Alice in wonderland would have to go to MK I think. HS should stay with the whole thrill movie theme. I'd be ok with a "dinosaur" type ride with a different movie theme at HS. Indiana jones could work, but maybe a newer movie would fit as well.
Yes they do, but there is a huge market for having at least part of them inside a theme park.Showplace is another infamous temporary structure.
Don't conventions have like places called convention centres to go to? And let paying guests use all the facilities of a theme park they've paid to enter?
Yes they do, but there is a huge market for having at least part of them inside a theme park.
What convention would you rather go to?
One with a banquet in a big square room with movable partition walls in some hotel or convention center or one where you get to eat dinner with the Munchkins in the land of Oz?
You are quite correct in that. All convention space seems in the parks seems to be an after thought.Another sad truth.
You would hope they would use a bit more finesse, though, by creating a better convention space that doesn't hinder or sacrifice park space... but then it comes down to priorities, and it's very disappointing where those priorities rest in regards to their parks, imo. But, you're absolutely correct.
The obvious one. But the parent company needs to decide what it's really into. Theme parks or conventions.Yes they do, but there is a huge market for having at least part of them inside a theme park.
What convention would you rather go to?
One with a banquet in a big square room with movable partition walls in some hotel or convention center or one where you get to eat dinner with the Munchkins in the land of Oz?
One thing I noticed was that the facade of Its a Small World at DL "fits in" thematically (style wise) to Alice in Wonderland. Maybe the two attractions can be built right next to each other (assuming the current IASW at WDW is taken out of its current space).
It is into money so they will go whichever way the dollar takes them.The obvious one. But the parent company needs to decide what it's really into. Theme parks or conventions.
Sad but true.It is into money so they will go whichever way the dollar takes them.
Oddly enough, the spaces on either side of the American pavilion weren't put in for future countries, but because there was a blue-sky plan to have a second lagoon south of the first one, and those spaces were how you would have reached it. Yes, incredible as it sounds now, Disney at one point thought they might not have enough room for all the pavilions that would eventually reside in World Showcase.Officially theres space for 10 as the american pavillion is currently a triple space.
I would love it if they brought Indiana Jones to WDW, but it would also be redundant as it's the same technology that's used in Dinosaur. Not sure if they would want to build what is essentially the same ride (albeit with a way better theme) in a different park.
That's not quite on target. Dinosaur and Indy don't just share the same underlying ride tech. The ride layouts are the same, too. I would say a better analogy would be Body Wars and Star Tours. Of course, Disney could re-develop the Indy ride concept to enhance the differences. Personally I would love to see an Indy ride at WDW; Dinosaur was never more than pretty good, in my opinion, and has only gotten worse over time.No, it's not. That's like saying WDW doesn't need Haunted Mansion because there's already an Omnimover ride.
Yes, I've been saying that for years.and moved to EC
Oddly enough, the spaces on either side of the American pavilion weren't put in for future countries, but because there was a blue-sky plan to have a second lagoon south of the first one, and those spaces were how you would have reached it. Yes, incredible as it sounds now, Disney at one point thought they might not have enough room for all the pavilions that would eventually reside in World Showcase.
Lots 7 and 8 are being used for the indoor convention space and other support facilities. The structures are not temporary trailers and are used fairly heavily throughout the year so I find it unlikely that they would use those locations.
I personally believe they would use lot 1 if they were to add a country with locations 2 and 3 the next most likely. In the case of lot 1 it's mostly out of Convenience as it's mostly empty. In the case of lots 2 and 3 it's mostly because they are so large.
Location 4 is used backstage for a variety of things but most of it is used for storage of festival structures like food and wine so I don't see it getting used. Lots 5 and 6 are kinda needed as visual blocks and are used to a limited degree on stage during Food and wine as well as Flower and Garden much like lot 4 is used for "park space".
Gives new meaning to "soul train"! LolDid someone mention monorail footings?
View attachment 64624
I guess all the parks have big ideas that never make it, but somehow the Epcot Center ones are more poignant. I've always felt that the unifying theme of EC was optimism, and in the early years, there really was this sense that as good as it was, we were just seeing the beginning. Let's not forget how many plots in World Showcase had the billboards up proclaiming "On this site will be built...", as though more pavilions were a done deal.@Slowjack I've heard that before about a second lagoon, but this is the first time I've heard about the spaces at the American Pavilion being reserved as waterways for it.
EC is riddled in mysteries of defunct blue sky dreams. The monorail footings for the once-planned downtown Disney spur is but one example.
The space reserved for a WEDway PeopleMover on the second floor of CommiCore is another.
I would love to make a listed collection of these.
The second lagoon would definitely be part of that list. Do you have any graphic or art showing what was being proposed?
This is the best post I've seen in a long time here. In a brochure I found on the web that was scanned from original marketing materials of the Disney subsidiary that owned the monorail and WEDway PeopleMover rights during the early '80's, there was a line that said that there was plans to use EPCOT Center to test future monorail and transportation technologies. I wondered what they could possibly be talking about. Maybe they had a plan that would have connected the second lagoon?I guess all the parks have big ideas that never make it, but somehow the Epcot Center ones are more poignant. I've always felt that the unifying theme of EC was optimism, and in the early years, there really was this sense that as good as it was, we were just seeing the beginning. Let's not forget how many plots in World Showcase had the billboards up proclaiming "On this site will be built...", as though more pavilions were a done deal.
I couldn't find a great example of the second lagoon in concept art, but I did find this a pic of a mass model for an earlier design.
You can see this shows the earlier design of some of the Future World pavilions. But I'm confident they had the second lagoon as a later-phase possibility even with the built design. I wish I could find it, but there's a quote from Marty Sklar around the time of opening to this effect. That said, the second lagoon idea seems kind of nuts. Not just because we now know that they don't need more space in World Showcase, but just because of the size. Epcot is tiring enough as it is. I can't imagine being far behind the American Adventure and contemplating a walk back to the entrance. Although maybe the second lagoon would have included a Wedway or some other way of saving our legs.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.