IAmFloridaBorn
Well-Known Member
Reguarding tat, that's the city's fault. Orlando won't ever grow IMO.The iSquare project is likely to be completely dead, or at least a shell of what was announced, by the end of the year or early next year. I said they wouldn't be able to put that kind of added stress on that intersection area, and the city came back and said just that. I said their current lot was way too small to handle what they wanted, and there wasn't any other land to realistically buy for it; the city came back and said that as well. I'm expecting to see several more I-Drive related projects that are too much to actually pull off over the next year or two.
As to the actual topic of this thread...I'd be very interested if Universal Blvd. were to be widened to three lanes from Sand Lake to Pointe Plaza, as that would indicate an expectation of serious upgrade in traffic flow. If the Orlando Eye complex and the work on the Wyndham site haven't pushed it to that point yet, it would take a pretty sizable project to do so...
Hyatt down the street has a tower over 400 ft with close to the same amount of rooms in a TERRIBLE location for traffic so I don't understand where the *Added stress* is coming from when Kirkman is 3 lanes.
I doubt Universal Blvd gets widened. No impossible though, I agree it would actually be beneficial.