Most of the people on here, if they don't care for Universal, will state that up front, and will usually say things like "It can all be done in under a day" (which is absurd). The approach that you appear to be taking, on the other hand, is to present yourself as someone who is a big fan of Universal and by stating things that no one could verify whether it's even true (such as your claim that you have an annual pass). Once you've established that, then you proceed to make statements comparing Universal to Six Flags and saying it's not even in Disney's league (once again...absurd). I think what's obvious that you're trying to do is have people read your posts and think, "Wow, this guy has an annual pass and he's a big fan...and even HE doesn't think it compares to Disney." The problem, though, is your approach is too extreme. The fact that you've put it in the same category as Six Flags, or even Busch Gardens or Sea World, kind of indicates that either you've never actually been to Universal, or you're embellishing the difference between Universal and Disney to a ridiculous level. Even people on here who say they don't like Universal would not generally put it in the same category as Six Flags. It was very much over the top, and in using that example, I think you pretty much blew your shot at giving your posts any credibility.
I kind of wonder if you have ever even actually been to Universal. Your assessment of it certainly doesn't sound like it.
