Universal Puts Disney's Reopening on Defensive

Tony Perkis

Well-Known Member
What if they have hay fever or allergies And not Covid19 ?? That would be discrimination. And high risk? Do they check ID’s to see if they are under 65, obese, diabetic, COPD And so on. It’s a tricky situation.
It really isn’t that tricky.

You, as a customer, are going to have to make some concessions. It’s not discrimination; it’s necessary risk management.

A high risk customer should not be visiting Disney World, or any gathering that will have thousands in attendance, during a worldwide pandemic, whether that person is the potential infector or infectee.

Doesn’t it sound excessive? Tough. These aren’t normal times.
 

Tony Perkis

Well-Known Member
And when a lot of cast members are over 65 years of age. One number demographic of the Covy.
Do they have an underlying health concern? Because THAT, combined with age, is what leads to being the most at risk, not just age in a vacuum. Just like how people under 40 aren't immune or invincible against it.

Disney should be holding their staff to a higher standard of work qualification during all of this as well. These are necessary risks if they wish to reopen. Does it suck for certain staff members? Yes. But it may end of saving their lives instead of the worst case scenario.
 
Last edited:

KeithVH

Well-Known Member
I don’t mind people visiting the resorts, but I do mind when their “visit” interferes with my vacation. People using the poly pool, renting all the boats, tying up the dining areas...thank God the club building requires magic bands for entry.

Yeah, like that works so well when Grandma and Grandpa bring in the other ten family members NOT staying/paying at the club level so they can shovel their faces full of food.

Sorry, off-topic hot button . . .
 

Tony Perkis

Well-Known Member
Wow, the Universal hate is in this thread is off the charts, even for this board.
Other than a few comments here and there, I think it's been rather cordial. And this is coming from someone who genuinely likes Universal more that WDW.

Most seem to acknowledge the inherent differences between the two resorts that make their reopening strategies unique.
 
Last edited:

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Oh, I had assumed they activated and used them last November and were hoping to use them in June and then November again this year before the 1 year point. If the AP’s have not yet been activated for the first time then there should be no problem. You can essentially sit on them for years before activating for the first time and starting the 1 year clock.
Yeah...that’s how that plan would go...
 

doctornick

Well-Known Member
If someone is coughing or sneezing, they shouldn’t be at Disney World in the first place, and those high-risk individuals should be turned away at whatever entry checkpoint is established. This is why a temperature and symptoms check system will definitely be installed.
A lot of people can be coughing or sneezing due to something totally benign and non contagious like due to allergies. Personally, I'm one of those people who sneezes in bright sunlight (it's called a photic sneeze reflex) - obviously that's something that happens in a place like Florida, so does that mean I shouldn't go to WDW even though I have no sign of infection?
 

disney4life2008

Well-Known Member
Let's be real. Wasn't world showcase already set up for flower and garden? I suspect they are trying to keep the food set up because what else is there to do in epcot? It has zero draw if you remove the food and drunks. Epcot is garbage.

Hollywood studios is a no brainer. Star War nerds will line up days in advance for rise.

Animal kingdom is safe. The park is big enough to spread out and even with limited attractions can still be a draw.

Magic Kingdom, cap at 10,000 only for Florida residents, resort guests, and annual pass. Everyone else can wait.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Didn’t a MIT researcher say it can travel up to 27 feet? So the six feet rule gives people a false sense of security. Disney should follow the 27 foot rule to keep guest safe.

Yes, an uncovered sneeze can project droplets that far.

That's why no sneeze should be uncovered. Whether wearing a mask or not, sneeze into your elbow or a disposable tissue.

The masks are to to stop people who are unknowing infected (pre- or a- symptomatic) from spreading COVID through micro droplets that come from talking and breathing. It's not a sneezeguard.
 
Last edited:

HauntedMansionFLA

Well-Known Member
Do they have an underlying health concern? Because THAT, combined with age, is what leads to being the most at risk, not just age in a vacuum. Just like how people under 40 aren't immune or invincible against it.

Disney should be holding their staff to a higher standard of work qualification during all of this as well. These are necessary risks if they wish to reopen. Does it suck for certain staff members? Yes. But it may end of saving their life instead of the worst case scenario.
But if they can’t work, how can the pay their rent, food, have some sort of way of life. I would think the CM will roll the dice and work instead of starving to death or have no where to live.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
A lot of people can be coughing or sneezing due to something totally benign and non contagious due to allergies. Personally, I'm one of those people who sneezes in bright sunlight - obviously that's something that happens in a place like Florida, so does that mean I shouldn't go to WDW even though I have no sign of infection?
You do have a sign of infection. Like a lot of things in medicine, your sign can be the result of a number of different causes and people are horrible at self diagnosis.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom