Do you have to buy a MoM wand for the EU MoM activations, or, will the ones from IoA and USF work in MoM?
I don’t think we know this yet, but let’s hope not. That’d be a bad move.Do you have to buy a MoM wand for the EU MoM activations, or, will the ones from IoA and USF work in MoM?
Why so dishonest? These are not the land's main selling points by any means.The first two things they talk about are a wand shop and butterbeer.
The attraction obviously is the headliner, and not what I was referring to.
Do you have to buy a MoM wand for the EU MoM activations, or, will the ones from IoA and USF work in MoM?
While true to the film, the land seems too Muggle- no whimsical architecture rendered askew from ages of time. Full scale realism with painted flourishes.
MoM could've gone in USF next to Diagon taking over MiB and Simpsons. And, bam, USF is no longer a third tier park.The Ministry of Magic ride was intended for USF until EU plans started formulating, and I agree it would have worked better (thematically) there, but the idea was too good to go unused and if they built it at USF, they would have had to come up with an equally amazing concept for EU. Was it the cheap way out? Sure. But I don't blame them. Just as how a Great Hall restaurant would make more sense at IOA, but if it ends up in EU as is rumored (where you get to it via Floo Network or Port Key), I think they'll get a pass.
They could've made a land out of the Weasly hovel!!As for Wizarding Paris, while I agree with your general sentiment, if not Paris, where? What other exterior locations could they do that would have any appeal?
Newt was still alive at the time of POAHogsmead at IOA must be set no later than 1997 (the year Dumbledore dies) given that he is present in Forbidden Journey
Diagon Alley at Uni Orlando theoretically is set in early May 1998 (the year Deathly Hallows is set) given the events that take place in Escape from Gringotts)
Yet the two lands have a train that connects them that would seem to imply that they take place at the same time (which they cannot)
Ministry of Magic is set no earlier than late May 1998 so we already know that it isn't the same timeline as the other two lands... it really sets the lands to be visited in chronological order from IOA, to UOR, to EU to create the full "trilogy" as they described it. The rest of Wizarding Paris can be exactly the same as it is in Fantastic Beasts so long as they include none of the FB characters. There is no reason to assume that many of the shops and such seen in Fantastic Beasts wouldn't still be around 70-80 years later (Olivander's itself is believe is over 1600 years old by the time of the events of Harry Potter). Someone already posted that Eddie Redmayne would reprise his role, but I guess they could always have him appearing in a portrait or as a ghost or something and still keep the timeline (at least of the EU land) consistent... though honestly, if they included Newt in the "flesh", only the biggest fans would question/complain...
I'm going to assume you meant MIB and the Fear Factor theater, otherwise you're asking for (by far) the largest dark ride ever created (and even that would still be quite large.)MoM could've gone in USF next to Diagon taking over MiB and Simpsons. And, bam, USF is no longer a third tier park.
The Ministry’s plot means it should have been in USF.
The land was originally Ministries of Magic.The Ministry of Magic ride was intended for USF until EU plans started formulating, and I agree it would have worked better (thematically) there, but the idea was too good to go unused and if they built it at USF, they would have had to come up with an equally amazing concept for EU. Was it the cheap way out? Sure.
It jerked its arms around. The compliance may be improved with time but what was shown is short of what Disney builds.That death eater animatronic is more impressive than anything on Tiana’s because they actually gave it something to do instead of just waving it’s arms unnaturally while speaking
“They sure can play!”That death eater animatronic is more impressive than anything on Tiana’s because they actually gave it something to do instead of just waving it’s arms unnaturally while speaking
They'd better be for the price...wands ain't cheap, but they're not Savi's lightsabers expensive. And at least you can play with the wands in the park.If Disney stuck a second Savi's in another park, you'd all cry about it. And Savi's is a FAR better experience than the wand shop.
Whats dishonest? They are literally the first two things they talk about in the video.Why so dishonest? These are not the land's main selling points by any means.
Still the same experience.A cool new version with different aesthetics.
The video builds to a crescendo - first points are not the main points. And they’re good ones regardless.Whats dishonest? They are literally the first two things they talk about in the video.
Not really; there’s no niffler at Diagon or Hogsmeade, for one easy example.Still the same experience.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.