Casper Gutman
Well-Known Member
So you think it's ok for a person that hasn't even been to WDW in 9 years, to comment on something he has never experienced or seen? As he does ALL over these forums? He is the one being dishonest and unappealing - as you are for defending him.
So no - I do NOT believe he has the right to comment on something until he has done something other than watch a youtube video, and listened to all the crap expounded by naysayers around here. Once he has visited all of the areas that he claims to know and love (which he has NEVER seen in person), then he can come here and yell and scream about how it all sucks then.
You don't get to decide what criteria people have to meet before they can have an opinion. And the number of times you have been to WDW do not make your arguments more valid than HMF's. This seems to upset you.
It's true that (with the partial exception of AK) Disney's parks are becoming less distinct as the organizing principle in each is neglected in favor of shoehorning in IPs. To that extent at least, HMF seems to be correct. The new MGM will be about being immersed in a movie - but so is Pandora at AK, the planned Guardians at Epcot (or Frozen, or Nemo...), and several rides at MK. Since MGM (like Uni) is totally abandoning the "behind-the-scenes" conceit - what makes it unique?