Let's face it those camels are doing a public service. For many guests it is the first time they have seen any water on their bodies in days. A refreshing change.But what would a trip to adventureland be without getting spit on by that iconic camel
And they are different models with different seating and different ride programs. That makes a huge difference. Jumpin' Jellyfish is awful and not nearly as fun as the Army Man configuration. Any resort hotel elevator is more fun.
There is some concern about quality and quantity, but as it stands what we see is what we're getting.
That's good to hear. I was told that they were looking at cutting more theming from slinky to add in an enhanced Woody M&G for capacity reasons in the land.
The M&Gs don't have a high capacity, and end up holding a lot of folks in the queues. That takes folks off the over crowded pathways.
I can't imagine anything's different, but I still feel the need to ask
- have you heard anything about timeframe? More specifically, is this land still not slated to open for two years?
I've heard nothing new time wise.I can't imagine anything's different, but I still feel the need to ask
Eh, that's what I figured. Still mind boggling how long it's taking (I mean, demo is all done).
I would want the money to go back into slinky, but if the money isn't to expand it but just more theming, as much as I hate to say it it might be smarter to keep a double Aliens. Just because of capacity reasons; this park will be busting at the seams come SW, it'll need all the capacity it can get.
I don't think a TS was ever planned, but there will still be a QS. It will be themed to a Woody's Roundup Lunchbox.
According to rumors we are getting a new high capacity ride but it's simply replacing one that's already there so for capacity it's pretty much a net gain of zero. I can't see the TSL rides having high capacity either.
Well, I mean, yeah, but the Mickey ride doesn't countAccording to rumors we are getting a new high capacity ride but it's simply replacing one that's already there so for capacity it's pretty much a net gain of zero. I can't see the TSL rides having high capacity either.
Aren't Disney's plans for DHS just magical and exactly what this park needs?
The two track layouts aren't really all that different. Other than the details in the rockwork that will be missed, the only difference is they instituted a second launch section to replace a lift hill at the start.I really hope they put the money back into slinky. It's better to have one mediocre and one nice ride rather than two subpar rides IMO.
For those who have forgot just how disappointing the new version looks, let's go back to the concept art comparison:
View attachment 157759
View attachment 157760
The first one looks leaps and bounds more fun. It's more than just a coaster but also a fun tour of Andy's backyard, seeing all sorts of toys from the movies and a lot of fun sets (and according to the original description of it, things would be triggered and move, so there were some things that were more than just static effects).
There is nothing in the second piece of art. It's just so incredibly dull. And even what toys are there and the second launch, both looks kind of ugly with the red track (at least in the art they do). Not to mention the winding path that went through the coaster is gone. Things like that are just cool to have areas to explore and there to be lots of live kinetic energy around you.
As we all know the art is never gospel when it comes to what we actually get, but still it looks so lame and not really fun in the second. I could maybe understand them wanting to cut all the rock work for what should be a cheaper land, but come on, how much could a big plastic shovel cost?
