Matt_Black
Well-Known Member
The thing is, they pulled out something in the hopes of getting approved when they knew, or at least suspected, that other elements would have gotten it denied anyway. It's not even cowardice at that point.
Except nothing was removed from the movie for that reason, a few wink-wink-nudge moments were lost because there were a lot of scenes cut for time in the theatrical release but all the more obvious ones were left in. Holtzmann was modified to reflect Kate McKinnon's style and the character is pretty firmly coded as LGBT in the theatrical release. Paul Feig and team were skilled enough to make it obvious to those of us that are LGBT without having to make her kiss anyone. Yes, Feig was concerned that if it was frankly stated in the movie he would get notes back from Sony, hence his "hate to be coy" comments on the subject. And that was likely part of his many considerations while putting the final product together, but nothing was removed from the movie because it of it.The thing is, they pulled out something in the hopes of getting approved when they knew, or at least suspected, that other elements would have gotten it denied anyway. It's not even cowardice at that point.
Uh oh.Aside: A friend saw a media showing of Fantastic Beasts and she felt kind of wishy-washy on it.
She didn't imply that the movie was bad thankfully, I think she is just concerned they've made a mistake billing it as part of the "Harry Potter universe" rater than it's own thing ... that just happens to be in the same magical world.Uh oh.
I just wish it was a book before it was a movie. The Potter books were packed with detail, and I feel like some of that will be lost in the movie (like Cursed Child).
From what I've heard, Dumbledore & Grindelwald will eventually show up, so in a way, it will be a true prequel of sorts. Though the only prequel that I want Rowling to write is about the Marauders and the first war with Voldemort.She didn't imply that the movie was bad thankfully, I think she is just concerned they've made a mistake billing it as part of the "Harry Potter universe" rater than it's own thing ... that just happens to be in the same magical world.
From what I've heard, Dumbledore & Grindelwald will eventually show up, so in a way, it will be a true prequel of sorts. Though the only prequel that I want Rowling to write is about the Marauders and the first war with Voldemort.
The next 2 weeks should be interesting. Fantastic Beasts comes out this Friday, and Moana is out in theaters on the 23rd (the Wednesday release should help it's numbers)Our top 5 again is nearly identical after the weekend; The Secret Life of Pets is 1.3 million behind Batman v Superman and will likely overtake the #5 spot.
Doctor Strange landed at #12 with an estimated 492.6 million worldwide. Notably, Doctor Strange only had a -49.4% drop in it's second domestic weekend, typically Marvel movies drop -55% to -60% in that space. It's been since 2012's Avengers that a Marvel movie enjoyed that small of a drop (-50.3%). Only 2 in the series had had lesser drops, the original Iron Man(-48.1%) and Thor(-47.2%) movies.
Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them was way better than I was expecting. I've been an HP fan for 16 years, and it was so nice to watch something and be surprised again.
That being said, I don't know how well this will do with non-Potter fans. Sure, it's a new story, but the title is a bit of a mouthful. Also, this isn't one I would take small children to see. No sooner would I think "Aw this is cute", would something very dark happen. There were at least 3 scenes that I would consider somewhat disturbing (without spoilers, American magical law enforcement can be incredibly ruthless, unless they were all under the Imperious curse, which I doubt).
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.