Tomorrow Land The Movie?

EpcotServo

EpcotServo

Well-Known Member
karshbmt said:
Forget Stitch and Monsters Inc... How about a visit to Cosmic Ray's Starlight Cafe with Sonny Eclipse?! I'd like to see that.:)
Click to expand...

INT. COSMIC RAY'S - DAY

A haggard man approaches the slick steel desk. LENS FLARES AS HE COLLAPSES on the hard steel, reaching for KAS MEMBAR. Sparks falling from the roof. EXPLOSION behind him.

HAGGARD MAN
I need a Double Cheezeburger....Lettt...LETTUCE. TOMATO. Punch it, NOW!

KAS MEMBAR looks upset, and defeated. Eyes sinking, he looks at the dying man. (Shaky Cam here)

KAS MEMBAR
Sir.......This.....This is the CHICKEN SIDE.

Pause.

HAGGARD MAN looks widly at the camera. Raises his fists to the air in defeat.

HAGGARD MAN
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!
 
MonsterManX

MonsterManX

New Member
EpcotServo said:
INT. COSMIC RAY'S - DAY

A haggard man approaches the slick steel desk. LENS FLARES AS HE COLLAPSES on the hard steel, reaching for KAS MEMBAR. Sparks falling from the roof. EXPLOSION behind him.

HAGGARD MAN
I need a Double Cheezeburger....Lettt...LETTUCE. TOMATO. Punch it, NOW!

KAS MEMBAR looks upset, and defeated. Eyes sinking, he looks at the dying man. (Shaky Cam here)

KAS MEMBAR
Sir.......This.....This is the CHICKEN SIDE.

Pause.

HAGGARD MAN looks widly at the camera. Raises his fists to the air in defeat.

HAGGARD MAN
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

Best.Post.EVVER XD

And it's funny because the first time I went to WDW that happened to me almost exact. And the lines were almost touching the door.

See my problem is the rock is gonna be in this. I feel like this movie has a lot to work with but if they use too much inspiration from disney character based attractions ( toy story , monsters inc , stitch *ugh*) it's gonna be an instant flop. They need a well around futureistic space comedy with tommarowland as the main area. And if you don't have Sunny Eclipse in this (His Singer and all) , there's no point in making this film. There's my 2 cents. If it goes well all I can see is sucess (even with the rock being in it , ugh) and shaping tommarowland more or so towards "the future". If not as everyone else thinks .... mega flop.

Also I still love and appreciate the underapprciated Haunted Mansion Flick , call it what you want but I felt like it was well made and Eddie Murphey is awesome in it.
 
Omnimover

Omnimover

Member
EpcotServo said:
INT. COSMIC RAY'S - DAY

A haggard man approaches the slick steel desk. LENS FLARES AS HE COLLAPSES on the hard steel, reaching for KAS MEMBAR. Sparks falling from the roof. EXPLOSION behind him.

HAGGARD MAN
I need a Double Cheezeburger....Lettt...LETTUCE. TOMATO. Punch it, NOW!

KAS MEMBAR looks upset, and defeated. Eyes sinking, he looks at the dying man. (Shaky Cam here)

KAS MEMBAR
Sir.......This.....This is the CHICKEN SIDE.

Pause.

HAGGARD MAN looks widly at the camera. Raises his fists to the air in defeat.

HAGGARD MAN
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

Post of the week. "Kas Membar's" name sounds like the Star Wars character that time forgot. :lol:
 
McAwesome2006

McAwesome2006

Banned
Original Poster
hrcollectibles said:
How was Wall-e in two movies that were made befroe Wall-e was released?
Click to expand...

They same way nemo was in Monster's inc. twice! Because they plan them YEARS in advance. One of the first things Pixar does it figure out what the main character is going to look like. Pixar loves to add things like this in their movies. You sould look up some of them on youtube. They are all on there.
 
ProjectXBlog

ProjectXBlog

Well-Known Member
jt04 said:
I guess it might help you to read the article. They are quite clear that is exactly what they are NOT doing :brick:
Click to expand...


Sorry, did I miss something? Because I did read the article, and I'm pretty sure the only thing they aren't doing is the "dystopian" future. Everything else is a bit...vague. So if my question seemed ignorant to any facts, be a bit more specific.
 
Fun2BFree

Fun2BFree

Active Member
ProjectXBlog said:
Sorry, did I miss something? Because I did read the article, and I'm pretty sure the only thing they aren't doing is the "dystopian" future. Everything else is a bit...vague. So if my question seemed ignorant to any facts, be a bit more specific.
Click to expand...

They do say that they're taking a "slightly faster" angle than a 1960s future and that it is "actually not retro", but also say that they think things will be better and give a Jetsons-style example of a laundry-washing closet.

Mixed signals if anything.
 
jt04

jt04

Well-Known Member
ProjectXBlog said:
Sorry, did I miss something? Because I did read the article, and I'm pretty sure the only thing they aren't doing is the "dystopian" future. Everything else is a bit...vague. So if my question seemed ignorant to any facts, be a bit more specific.
Click to expand...

Here is the question/quote under discussion thanks to the underrated "Orlando Attractions" magazine.

Q. So do you update it or go for the kitsch?

A. We’re not laughing at the idea. We’re not laughing at Tomorrowland or the idea of what people in the ’60s thought the future would be. Our goal, whether we’re successful or not, is the vision of the future is actually the best future. It’s not post-apocalyptic or dark and gritty. It’s like everything you wish you could have, every gadget and device and car, that’s what it’s like in the future. So the future is actually really great.

The question is asking if they will lift the kitcsh of the Disney park T-land theme. When they answer they are saying that the movie will not be doing that or the kitsch of the 60's optimistic vision of the future, (for example The Jetsons). They also will not be doing the retro future of Buck Rogers, for instance which they mention elsewhere.

Instead they seem to be planning a fully realized and imaginative REAL future with a better comparison being Walt's E.P.C.O.T. on steroids. Although I have a feeling they will throw in plenty of "easter eggs" to please us hard core Disney fans.

That is how I read it anyway.
 
ProjectXBlog

ProjectXBlog

Well-Known Member
jt04 said:
Here is the question/quote under discussion thanks to the underrated "Orlando Attractions" magazine.

Q. So do you update it or go for the kitsch?

A. We’re not laughing at the idea. We’re not laughing at Tomorrowland or the idea of what people in the ’60s thought the future would be. Our goal, whether we’re successful or not, is the vision of the future is actually the best future. It’s not post-apocalyptic or dark and gritty. It’s like everything you wish you could have, every gadget and device and car, that’s what it’s like in the future. So the future is actually really great.

The question is asking if they will lift the kitcsh of the Disney park T-land theme. When they answer they are saying that the movie will not be doing that or the kitsch of the 60's optimistic vision of the future, (for example The Jetsons). They also will not be doing the retro future of Buck Rogers, for instance which they mention elsewhere.

Instead they seem to be planning a fully realized and imaginative REAL future with a better comparison being Walt's E.P.C.O.T. on steroids. Although I have a feeling they will throw in plenty of "easter eggs" to please us hard core Disney fans.

That is how I read it anyway.
Click to expand...


I get you. I feel like the whole thing is too vague to try to make anything out of it yet.
 
jt04

jt04

Well-Known Member
ProjectXBlog said:
I get you. I feel like the whole thing is too vague to try to make anything out of it yet.
Click to expand...

My imagination was filled with ideas as soon as I read their description. I thought of a much more optimistic Disney-esque version of something like Minority Report. But also you would have the thematic element of time travel and all of the twists that opens up. Think of Terminator. Then you have the dramatic and comic possibilities for an actor like the charismatic Dwayne Johnson in a "fish out of water" prediciment where the audience is in on the "joke" but the character isn't. Ripe with possibilities.

Just as one example, he could possibly end up finding his own child in "Tomorrowland", who may be 250 years old but look middle aged, as it could be that science has learned to stop or greatly slow aging by then. So essentially they have unlimited storyline possibilities here.
 
palmickey420

palmickey420

Active Member
wow and what happened to the idea of the JC movie... and wasn't Meet the Robinson's Tomorrowland cause when he 1st sees the future u see SM in the background
 
EPCOT Explorer

EPCOT Explorer

New Member
Fun2BFree said:
They do say that they're taking a "slightly faster" angle than a 1960s future and that it is "actually not retro", but also say that they think things will be better and give a Jetsons-style example of a laundry-washing closet.

Mixed signals if anything.
Click to expand...
"Your Smart Suitcase knows what to pack...!"

Sounds familiar.:lookaroun
 
EpcotServo

EpcotServo

Well-Known Member
To reiterate, this movie is pointless.

There's a show called FUTURAMA, and it makes the idea for this movie incredibly laughable-even more so than the weak story put out thus far.
 
jt04

jt04

Well-Known Member
EpcotServo said:
To reiterate, this movie is pointless.

There's a show called FUTURAMA, and it makes the idea for this movie incredibly laughable-even more so than the weak story put out thus far.
Click to expand...

They put out a story? To answer my own question, no they haven't.

I love how the concept of portraying an optimistic future is tweaking the doom and gloom crowd (not talking about you).

Walt Disney would be proud of the concept being put forward by his company.

And Dwayne Johnson will be proud to star in it.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom