A bit harsh, no?
Toy Story (Midway) Mania is pretty popular.
I don't think it's harsh to call Everest the huge embarrassment that it is. They had entire hour-long TV specials (several) about it, including one that largely focused on the Yeti itself. They promoted this ride to all heck - but it's really just an OK roller-coaster inside an almost completely un-themed interior without the Yeti.
And, in fact, the Yeti isn't even that impressive when it does work - it goes by so quickly most people didn't even notice it when it did work (the show should have been designed to stop in front of him, like Kong) and it was just a poor place to design him in the first place. They spent more time and effort on a queue and details that 99% of park goers won't even notice and have the 'main attraction' inside broken for years. If that's not an embarrassment, I don't know what is.
As to TSM, yup, people wait up to 3 hours to ride. I'd love to see the guest satisfaction on that one - if people were polled after waiting 3 hours to ride it if they thought it was worth half their day to wait for.
TSM is a neat little thing, but as I specified earlier it certainly isn't an E-ticket and there is nothing new or revolutionary about it. It's a Toy Story ride where you shoot guns. Sound like any other ride, say one in the MK? Only instead of a reasonably immersive dark ride, it's just video screens (just like most of us have at home, simply larger - and you can even buy the game that simulates it to play right at home).
Don't get me wrong, it's not a "bad" ride, there just was nothing new, innovative, or terribly exciting about it. I think you'll find it so popular because of the dearth of other things to do at MGM for the age group that it is most popular with, or because of the lack of overall "family" rides. People are just desperate there to ride something together than isn't GMR or Star Tours. It wasn't a "bad" addition, but it certainly wasn't any great feat or terribly impressive as an experience, either.
The new Fastpass may be linked to your staying at a Disney Resort.
This is what I am most surprised people haven't really been talking about. This just smacks of the caste system that many of us have been dreading. I don't see any other way to do it than tie it to hotel reservations, because otherwise you'd just have people signing up for FP for fun that may not even be going to WDW. It's possible for them to attach it to tickets, but not a lot of people have hard tickets before they arrive so it's hard to see how they could set the system up for anyone but hotel guests with confirmation #, or perhaps AP holders as well.
If it becomes another on-property perk, I think a lot of people could live with it - but it's a sliding slope, where stay at a value you get X amount of FP, if you stay at a mod you get X(x2) FP's, Deluxe X(x3), etc. Many would argue that is just fine - I can see why it would, or would not, be attractive, sort of on the fence (pay more = get more makes sense, but on the other hand it just feels kind of dirty and shady), but I am very surprised that few people have discussed this connection. We have talked about these patents before, and this sounds like what they are talking about.
That all said, I still stick with my original wish - that they would build a bunch of new rides to experience instead of spending a billion dollars to re-jigger how we go on the ones that are already there.