News Tiana's Bayou Adventure - latest details and construction progress

retr0gate

Well-Known Member
It seems like the general response has either been overwhelmingly positive or overwhelmingly negative depending on who you talk to. Having finally ridden it in person recently, I found myself somewhere in the middle. All this talk about it being an upgrade or a downgrade but it truly feels like an equal trade off. The "bones" of Splash Mountain are still there and anything that was removed was replaced by something equally substantial (even if not always in the same exact location). It really just felt like the same ride in a different font.
 

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
It seems like the general response has either been overwhelmingly positive or overwhelmingly negative depending on who you talk to. Having finally ridden it in person recently, I found myself somewhere in the middle. All this talk about it being an upgrade or a downgrade but it truly feels like an equal trade off. The "bones" of Splash Mountain are still there and anything that was removed was replaced by something equally substantial (even if not always in the same exact location). It really just felt like the same ride in a different font.
Unfortunately, they went with Comic Sans. They should have just stuck with Times New Roman and did a book report.
1719928224666.jpeg
 

Epcot82Guy

Well-Known Member
It seems like the general response has either been overwhelmingly positive or overwhelmingly negative depending on who you talk to. Having finally ridden it in person recently, I found myself somewhere in the middle. All this talk about it being an upgrade or a downgrade but it truly feels like an equal trade off. The "bones" of Splash Mountain are still there and anything that was removed was replaced by something equally substantial (even if not always in the same exact location). It really just felt like the same ride in a different font.

I think that sums up a number of problems with current projects. They are a trade off. Leaving aside the other parts of this story for Splash itself and its inspiration material, to take something that is enjoyed, spend this time and money on it - for it to basically be a lateral move - is hard to justify as success. It shows a disconnect with the broader audience.

I think the fairer comparison in these scenarios is the existing attraction with the new attraction's budget as a massive renovation/redo budget. Not the old attraction on its last legs to the new attraction on its first legs.

I genuinely wonder if a significantly renovated/enhanced Splash (again, ignoring the other issues) would result in the same result for you - or anyone else.
 

EagleScout610

This time of year I become rather Grinchy
Premium Member
It seems like the general response has either been overwhelmingly positive or overwhelmingly negative depending on who you talk to. Having finally ridden it in person recently, I found myself somewhere in the middle. All this talk about it being an upgrade or a downgrade but it truly feels like an equal trade off. The "bones" of Splash Mountain are still there and anything that was removed was replaced by something equally substantial (even if not always in the same exact location). It really just felt like the same ride in a different font.
I've said my piece on this, but my biggest problem is how many scenes that were full of AAs were just replaced by nothing. The biggest offenders to me are: Four geese and thre frogs being replaced by one Louis, the Raccoon/Porcupine and sweeping rabbits becoming screens, Br'er Rabbit, Fox, and Bear in the bee cave (and all the spinning bees) being replaced by Mondo and a giant bottle. It just leaves alot of dead space where the animatronics used to fit so seamlessly into the world.
 

Attachments

  • Bees.PNG
    Bees.PNG
    729.7 KB · Views: 129
  • Br;er Frog Comp.PNG
    Br;er Frog Comp.PNG
    1.1 MB · Views: 125
  • Bunnies Comp.PNG
    Bunnies Comp.PNG
    790.1 KB · Views: 123
  • Geese Compare Louis.png
    Geese Compare Louis.png
    673.7 KB · Views: 122
  • Geese Compare right.png
    Geese Compare right.png
    640.1 KB · Views: 131
  • FoxandRabbitComp.png
    FoxandRabbitComp.png
    473.6 KB · Views: 91
  • Vultures Compare.png
    Vultures Compare.png
    427.2 KB · Views: 92
  • FarCom.PNG
    FarCom.PNG
    619.8 KB · Views: 97
Last edited:

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
At the risk of scouring through 854 pages can someone tell if this update is a success or not ?
It depends on what you define as a success.

This is a success as defined by TWDC already I think.

Success as defined by the guest, its too early to tell.

My personal requirements for success are very basic. Can I get on the ride in a reasonable amount of time and it does not go down. I already like this attraction as its a fun log flume ride.
 
Last edited:

disneyC97

Well-Known Member
I've said my piece on this, but my biggest problem is how many scenes that were full of AAs were just replaced by nothing. The biggest offenders to me are: Four geese and thre frogs being replaced by one Louis, the Raccoon/Porcupine and sweeping rabbits becoming screens, Br'er Rabbit, Fox, and Bear in the bee cave (and all the spinning bees) being replaced by Mondo and a giant bottle. It just leaves alot of dead space where the animatronics used to fit so seamlessly into the world.
Agreed. I said it somewhere else here or on the DL version of this thread, but I can't imagine this was anything but intentional. Less AAs or other moving parts going forward, less maintenance expenses. It's a much smaller thing, but felt the same way when they removed the original parrot barker bird in front of PotC.
 

Incomudro

Well-Known Member
I've said my piece on this, but my biggest problem is how many scenes that were full of AAs were just replaced by nothing. The biggest offenders to me are: Four geese and thre frogs being replaced by one Louis, the Raccoon/Porcupine and sweeping rabbits becoming screens, Br'er Rabbit, Fox, and Bear in the bee cave (and all the spinning bees) being replaced by Mondo and a giant bottle. It just leaves alot of dead space where the animatronics used to fit so seamlessly into the world.
The difference in composition between those still images is staggering.
 

JohnD

Well-Known Member
I've said my piece on this, but my biggest problem is how many scenes that were full of AAs were just replaced by nothing. The biggest offenders to me are: Four geese and thre frogs being replaced by one Louis, the Raccoon/Porcupine and sweeping rabbits becoming screens, Br'er Rabbit, Fox, and Bear in the bee cave (and all the spinning bees) being replaced by Mondo and a giant bottle. It just leaves alot of dead space where the animatronics used to fit so seamlessly into the world.
Agreed. No need to get into why. That has been covered ad nauseum. But if it didn't have at least as many scenes as Splash, it would be deemed as not as great as the original to put it mildly.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom