So, Belle looks old?It's very subjective, but the eyes, eyebrows, forehead, bridge of nose, cheeks, chin all look kinda similar.
So, Belle looks old?It's very subjective, but the eyes, eyebrows, forehead, bridge of nose, cheeks, chin all look kinda similar.
Yeah. He gained a fanbase several years ago when he managed to acquire an info dump that had some legitimate accuracy. Though some of this was already circulating the rumor mill beforehand anyway, like this retheme. And a significant amount of the accurate negativity is merely repeating what everyone else could clearly see was written on the wall (like the failures of the Starcruiser or the other management cuts which have been ongoing for decades now).Is he always been this negative?
There's a fanmade Disney wiki that's fairly popular. Here's the article on Tiana's Bayou Adventure: https://disney.fandom.com/wiki/Tiana's_Bayou_AdventureWhat Disney wiki?
I'm not sure why everyone is getting so defensive. They have similar facial features and appearance. I don't think there's anything nefarious about it.So, Belle looks old?
View attachment 768588
View attachment 768589
View attachment 768590
Yeah the two AA look a little the same I guess. Disney was not going to make a custom AA for this ride so I don't think it's unreasonable to say that they have similar appearances.
I think the most noticeable difference is the way the AA character presents in 3D, but that is going to happen anytime you have a change from the 2D version everyone is used to seeing.
I'm not sure why everyone is getting so defensive. They have similar facial features and appearance. I don't think there's anything nefarious about it.
If the issue was money, how much money could Disney have saved by copy/pasting the face of an AA? Seems kinda ridiculous.
but why would they do that? It is one of the longest rides in the park already...Slowing the logs down also allows stupid people to try and get out of their logs....If anything I would they would try and speed things up...Higher throughput...get people to that Beignet stand!!
The ride speed does not affect the hourly capacity (unless there are not enough logs to restock the load/unload)If they were to make changes to the ride speed, which I doubt, it would be to speed it up to increase capacity. Not slow it down
In this hypothetical, would there not be more dispatched per hour because logs were going through faster? Or is that negligible and just cause bigger backups at the station?The ride speed does not affect the hourly capacity (unless there are not enough logs to restock the load/unload)
The only 2 things that affect ride hourly capacity are:
1) Number of people per vehicle
2) Average dispatch time of vehicle
Ride time, number to vehicles on track, speed of attraction (outside of loading area), track length, ect. Do not affect the hourly capacity.
Outside of cheek prominence, this Tiana figure looks very different from Belle. The eyebrows and hairline, but especially the size/shape of the nose and mouth.Did you even read my post? No conspiracy theories. Disney was not going to make a brand new AA design for this, they took what was already existing and customized it to work with this application. It just happens that my personal opinion is that they have similar facial features. Other people have noticed this as well. Even if it was done intentionally, what difference does it make? You're being very defensive for no reason.
I don’t think anyone disagrees the 2D to 3D transition creates the perception of a different appearance for each character.Outside of cheek prominence, this Tiana figure looks very different from Belle. The eyebrows and hairline, but especially the size/shape of the nose and mouth.
What they are saying is... Disney did not build two Belle animatronics in the hope of using a second one for an attraction that hadn't even been planned yet. Furthermore, OLC paid for those Belle animatronics, they weren't going to foot the bill for a spare. The base work for AA's are similar, not discrediting that, but this is a custom built animatronic for Tiana's Bayou Adventure.I really don't appreciate your anger towards me. I also certainly don't appreciate you accusing me of engaging in some conspiracy theory.
Did Disney have to do same amount engineering and design work on the level of the first A1000 to make the Tianna AA? OR did they use the A1000 design they had and modify and/or customize it to create the Tianna AA. I'm not disputing these are complicated machines that are hand built. But I don't think it's unreasonable or a conspiracy theory to say that a lot of the legwork in terms of creating and designing this AA was already done before.
To which I don't believe I ever said was the case.What they are saying is... Disney did not build two Belle animatronics in the hope of using a second one for an attraction that hadn't even been planned yet. Furthermore, OLC paid for those Belle animatronics, they weren't going to foot the bill for a spare.
Exactly. The engineering/design for the core AA is already there. It is a new custom hand-built AA, but it's not a "new" AA design being used.The base work for AA's are similar, not discrediting that, but this is a custom built animatronic for Tiana's Bayou Adventure.
Yes... but implying that it is the "same" AA is incorrect. Do Belle & Tiana have similar facial structures? Yes, most "Disney Princesses" do. Did Disney build a brand new, custom built Belle AA1000 in the past few years? Yes. Did Disney build a brand new, custom built Tiana AA1000 in the past few years? Both of those things are true.Exactly. The engineering/design for the core AA is already there. It is a new custom hand-built AA, but it's not a "new" AA design being reused.
People on this site seem to be overly defensive about the retheme as a whole. I have a pretty good idea why.Again not sure why people are being so overly defensive about this.
I can't speak to other people's motivations behind their posts, but mine is simple, unless they made carbon copies, as some have suggested, there is no real motivations to produce a "similar" figure. I actually think it *may* be more expensive for them to modify an existing figures plans to make it work as a different character.This whole thing is conspiracy theory thing is bordering on silly.
Would it be unreasonable to think that Disney bean counters are going to insist on reusing as much of the Belle A1000 as possible in order to keep development costs for the very expensive Tianna AA down? Simply pointing out the very subjective similarities in exterior features does not mean they are carbon copies, which is ridiculous in and of itself. Again, I'm not sure why everyone is getting so defensive about this.
This whole thing is conspiracy theory thing is bordering on silly.
Would it be unreasonable to think that Disney bean counters are going to insist on reusing as much of the Belle A1000 as possible in order to keep development costs for the very expensive Tianna AA down? Simply pointing out the very subjective similarities in exterior features does not mean they are carbon copies, which is ridiculous in and of itself. Again, I'm not sure why everyone is getting so defensive about this.
It’s a theory cooked up by @TP2000 and based on nothing more than his belief that the animatronic looks at least fifteen years older than the animated character. Why treat it as a legitimate rumour?I'm hearing in the thread for Disneyland's retheme that Tiana is going to be older in this ride and that's why she looks a bit off? Is that true? And if so, why? What does that add to the story?
So none of the design work or components or testing results were reused in this one? Completely new engineering? Then why seemingly standardize it with an A1000 model if there is no commonality with previous itterations?You're making very clear that you know not of which you speak here, so let me state it definitively - the Tiana Animatronic was designed from scratch, as much as any other A1000 Animatronic. "A1000" is a classification, it's not a stock design. So no, "engineering/design for the core AA" is NOT "already there".
Thank you for explaining that. I don't believe I ever downplayed the complexity of these machines. I also don't think it's unreasonable to draw on similarities from past examples of this model AA and apply them to how the new one is being developed. Simply casting someone as a conspiracy theorists because they have a different perspective (wrong or right) is certainly unbecoming.As I've stated clearly, the exterior design for Tiana was determined first, and then the design and engineering of her inner workings was designed after to serve the desired look and intended performance of the figure. As is the case with any Animatronic figure of this magnitude. What you are suggesting is incorrect and downplays the effort that went into this figure, which is silly at best and also totally misplaced.
It’s a theory cooked up by @TP2000 and based on nothing more than his belief that the animatronic looks at least fifteen years older than the animated character. Why treat it as a legitimate rumour?
Tiana that has been doing the M&G at Tiana's Palace (I believe she still comes around) is also portrayed to be older similar to how she will look in the ride -
That's a weird decision to make from a merchandising and target-audience perspective.
Something tells me the "Older, Wiser, Career Woman with Mom-Hairdo Tiana" merchandise isn't going to sell as well with the target demographic of young girls as the "Young, Pretty, Glamorous, Princess Tiana" merchandise.
This isn't new information. The attraction announcement since day one has stated to be after the events of the movie, and subsequent information since has come out that its set years after the movie. Even the art work shows Tiana in new outfits and older than the movie. So not sure why this is now a surprise 3+ years later for some.
A contrast of containment standards. One being too high and one likely being too low…I rode Secret Life of Pets out in Universal Hollywood with Jim Hill and Jim Shull (former WDI exec). One of the things we noticed was that the TMs really, really push down on that safety bar lock, even though the ride moves at like 1.5 miles per hour. And Shull theorized they do that so you don't jump out of the ride to take selfies with the pets. 100% believable.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.