News Tiana's Bayou Adventure - latest details and construction progress

MerlinTheGoat

Well-Known Member
Is he always been this negative?
Yeah. He gained a fanbase several years ago when he managed to acquire an info dump that had some legitimate accuracy. Though some of this was already circulating the rumor mill beforehand anyway, like this retheme. And a significant amount of the accurate negativity is merely repeating what everyone else could clearly see was written on the wall (like the failures of the Starcruiser or the other management cuts which have been ongoing for decades now).

Whatever/whoever his source was at the time, it dried up very quickly. He started to post really crazy and obviously made up conspiracy theories about the company. The most absurd being that Bob Chapek was a genius messiah like figure who would save the company and usher in a new renaissance of sorts, and that Bob Iger would imminently become a disgraced pariah due to illegal dealings that would soon be made public thanks to Chapek.

There's endless amounts of real negative things Disney is doing. And that's a significant factor in how he was able to gain popularity. He's repeating a lot of stuff that people already know from regular observation. But following his initial list of predictions that made a name for him (not all of which ended up happening, but I will at least say had the potential of happening), the stuff that originates from Pro (and wasn't parroted from others or easily verified by basic observation) has had a ton of inaccuracies.

From what I and now other have been told, he's been wrong about pretty much everything regarding this ride following the initial announcement (after the early blue sky plans that were scrapped pretty quickly). He's still claiming the budget is tiny, likely using the old $40 million figure he got ahold of. While this budget was indeed accurate back in 2020 when it was first announced, it has since skyrocketed and the project has become dramatically more ambitious. Demolition work alone ended up allocating that exact amount according to a permit. And that isn't including anything that was put back in such as infrastructure, paint, scenery or animatronics etc. Pro seems to still be peddling that initial $40 mil for the overall budget. I don't know whether he's unaware that things have changed or (just as likely) won't admit he was wrong because optimistic comments are antithetical to his agenda. Maybe both though because again it also seems apparent that he doesn't know anything about the finalized plans regardless.

There's plenty I don't know about this ride myself of course. Including an exact number of AA's it will have. I am more than confident however that it has FAR more than 17. Should be multiple times that.
 
Last edited:

monothingie

Nakatomi Plaza Christmas Eve 1988. Never Forget.
Premium Member
So, Belle looks old?
I'm not sure why everyone is getting so defensive. They have similar facial features and appearance. I don't think there's anything nefarious about it.

If the issue was money, how much money could Disney have saved by copy/pasting the face of an AA? Seems kinda ridiculous.
 

Drew the Disney Dude

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
Yes
20240215_131440.jpg
20240215_134700.jpg
20240215_135841.jpg
20240215_140853.jpg
20240215_140945.jpg
20240215_141101.jpg
20240215_141707.jpg
20240215_141804.jpg
20240215_143607.jpg


Alright, here's all the photos I got today.

As I mentioned earlier, scaffolding is coming down, painting being done in the queue, and the flowers and moss are almost done on the millhouse.
 

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
View attachment 768588
View attachment 768589
View attachment 768590

Yeah the two AA look a little the same I guess. Disney was not going to make a custom AA for this ride so I don't think it's unreasonable to say that they have similar appearances.

I think the most noticeable difference is the way the AA character presents in 3D, but that is going to happen anytime you have a change from the 2D version everyone is used to seeing.

I'm not sure why everyone is getting so defensive. They have similar facial features and appearance. I don't think there's anything nefarious about it.

If the issue was money, how much money could Disney have saved by copy/pasting the face of an AA? Seems kinda ridiculous.

With respect, people aren't getting defensive, they're just correcting you.

The Tiana Animatronic is custom. She was also very expensive. I don't know where this idea came from that Animatronics and their inner workings are so easily interchangable, but it's very far from the truth.

The reason she and Belle look at all similar is because the Disney Princesses characters - at least the hand-drawn ones - follow similar design principles. Their proportions, body types, and facial structures have historically been drawn with many similarities. Thankfully Disney started to break that mold in the 90's, but there's still a clear consistency throughout the hand-drawn Princesses, for better or worse:

1708030004805.png


Disney spent gobs of money on Tiana's Bayou Adventure. Thankfully, that should be evident in the finished product - attractions like Cosmic Rewind prove that the money doesn't always get spent in ways that are visible on-stage. Tiana's will not be like that.

On top of that, Disney's Animatronics are hugely expensive, especially A1000's like Tiana and Belle. This idea that Tiana is simply a reskinned Belle is silly for 2 reasons - 1) Because Disney does not produce extras of these massively complex and extravagant figures, and 2) Because the only thing more difficult than trying to capture the likeness and performance of an iconic character in a scratch-built Animatronic would be to try to do the same thing using a base that was not designed for that character. There's no world in which they could or would throw a Tiana skin on a Belle Animatronic and expect it to look partway decent. Not that there are any spare Belles to do that with in the first place.
 

Purduevian

Well-Known Member
but why would they do that? It is one of the longest rides in the park already...Slowing the logs down also allows stupid people to try and get out of their logs....If anything I would they would try and speed things up...Higher throughput...get people to that Beignet stand!!

If they were to make changes to the ride speed, which I doubt, it would be to speed it up to increase capacity. Not slow it down
The ride speed does not affect the hourly capacity (unless there are not enough logs to restock the load/unload)
The only 2 things that affect ride hourly capacity are:
1) Number of people per vehicle
2) Average dispatch time of vehicle

Ride time, number to vehicles on track, speed of attraction (outside of loading area), track length, ect. Do not affect the hourly capacity.
 

Sectorkeeper71

Well-Known Member
The ride speed does not affect the hourly capacity (unless there are not enough logs to restock the load/unload)
The only 2 things that affect ride hourly capacity are:
1) Number of people per vehicle
2) Average dispatch time of vehicle

Ride time, number to vehicles on track, speed of attraction (outside of loading area), track length, ect. Do not affect the hourly capacity.
In this hypothetical, would there not be more dispatched per hour because logs were going through faster? Or is that negligible and just cause bigger backups at the station?
 

MerlinTheGoat

Well-Known Member
@yensidtlaw1969

Did you hear any rumors about a more specific quantity of figures? Even just a ballpark or whatever. Not that I distrust my own source, but additional clarification/confirmation from multiple independent sources is always a good thing.

Did you even read my post? No conspiracy theories. Disney was not going to make a brand new AA design for this, they took what was already existing and customized it to work with this application. It just happens that my personal opinion is that they have similar facial features. Other people have noticed this as well. Even if it was done intentionally, what difference does it make? You're being very defensive for no reason.
Outside of cheek prominence, this Tiana figure looks very different from Belle. The eyebrows and hairline, but especially the size/shape of the nose and mouth.

And regarding the cheek thing, Tiana and Belle have nearly identical cheek shapes in their animated forms to begin with...

1708033051038.png

1708033158146.png
 

monothingie

Nakatomi Plaza Christmas Eve 1988. Never Forget.
Premium Member
Outside of cheek prominence, this Tiana figure looks very different from Belle. The eyebrows and hairline, but especially the size/shape of the nose and mouth.
I don’t think anyone disagrees the 2D to 3D transition creates the perception of a different appearance for each character.

With the AA, I think the several features on the face are similar to the Belle AA. I also think in terms of the appearance of facial features, the two AAs share more in common with each other, than with their respective 2D caricature. It's a subjective opinion so feel free to disagree.
 

MagicHappens1971

Well-Known Member
I really don't appreciate your anger towards me. I also certainly don't appreciate you accusing me of engaging in some conspiracy theory.

Did Disney have to do same amount engineering and design work on the level of the first A1000 to make the Tianna AA? OR did they use the A1000 design they had and modify and/or customize it to create the Tianna AA. I'm not disputing these are complicated machines that are hand built. But I don't think it's unreasonable or a conspiracy theory to say that a lot of the legwork in terms of creating and designing this AA was already done before.
What they are saying is... Disney did not build two Belle animatronics in the hope of using a second one for an attraction that hadn't even been planned yet. Furthermore, OLC paid for those Belle animatronics, they weren't going to foot the bill for a spare. The base work for AA's are similar, not discrediting that, but this is a custom built animatronic for Tiana's Bayou Adventure.
 

monothingie

Nakatomi Plaza Christmas Eve 1988. Never Forget.
Premium Member
What they are saying is... Disney did not build two Belle animatronics in the hope of using a second one for an attraction that hadn't even been planned yet. Furthermore, OLC paid for those Belle animatronics, they weren't going to foot the bill for a spare.
To which I don't believe I ever said was the case.
The base work for AA's are similar, not discrediting that, but this is a custom built animatronic for Tiana's Bayou Adventure.
Exactly. The engineering/design for the core AA is already there. It is a new custom hand-built AA, but it's not a "new" AA design being used.
 

MagicHappens1971

Well-Known Member
Exactly. The engineering/design for the core AA is already there. It is a new custom hand-built AA, but it's not a "new" AA design being reused.
Yes... but implying that it is the "same" AA is incorrect. Do Belle & Tiana have similar facial structures? Yes, most "Disney Princesses" do. Did Disney build a brand new, custom built Belle AA1000 in the past few years? Yes. Did Disney build a brand new, custom built Tiana AA1000 in the past few years? Both of those things are true.
 

Brer Panther

Well-Known Member
I'm hearing in the thread for Disneyland's retheme that Tiana is going to be older in this ride and that's why she looks a bit off? Is that true? And if so, why? What does that add to the story?
Again not sure why people are being so overly defensive about this.
People on this site seem to be overly defensive about the retheme as a whole. I have a pretty good idea why.

By the way, I don't think the Tiana animatronic is a reskin of Belle either (maybe that one holding the lantern in the concept art will share be, who knows?). But the outrage people are having over that theory does seem to be a bit overblown.
 

MagicHappens1971

Well-Known Member
This whole thing is conspiracy theory thing is bordering on silly.

Would it be unreasonable to think that Disney bean counters are going to insist on reusing as much of the Belle A1000 as possible in order to keep development costs for the very expensive Tianna AA down? Simply pointing out the very subjective similarities in exterior features does not mean they are carbon copies, which is ridiculous in and of itself. Again, I'm not sure why everyone is getting so defensive about this.
I can't speak to other people's motivations behind their posts, but mine is simple, unless they made carbon copies, as some have suggested, there is no real motivations to produce a "similar" figure. I actually think it *may* be more expensive for them to modify an existing figures plans to make it work as a different character.
 

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
This whole thing is conspiracy theory thing is bordering on silly.

Would it be unreasonable to think that Disney bean counters are going to insist on reusing as much of the Belle A1000 as possible in order to keep development costs for the very expensive Tianna AA down? Simply pointing out the very subjective similarities in exterior features does not mean they are carbon copies, which is ridiculous in and of itself. Again, I'm not sure why everyone is getting so defensive about this.

Yes, because that's not how these things work at all.
 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
I'm hearing in the thread for Disneyland's retheme that Tiana is going to be older in this ride and that's why she looks a bit off? Is that true? And if so, why? What does that add to the story?
It’s a theory cooked up by @TP2000 and based on nothing more than his belief that the animatronic looks at least fifteen years older than the animated character. Why treat it as a legitimate rumour?

At any rate, that the animatronic of Naveen’s brother is designed very much to look like a child should answer your question.
 

monothingie

Nakatomi Plaza Christmas Eve 1988. Never Forget.
Premium Member
You're making very clear that you know not of which you speak here, so let me state it definitively - the Tiana Animatronic was designed from scratch, as much as any other A1000 Animatronic. "A1000" is a classification, it's not a stock design. So no, "engineering/design for the core AA" is NOT "already there".
So none of the design work or components or testing results were reused in this one? Completely new engineering? Then why seemingly standardize it with an A1000 model if there is no commonality with previous itterations?
As I've stated clearly, the exterior design for Tiana was determined first, and then the design and engineering of her inner workings was designed after to serve the desired look and intended performance of the figure. As is the case with any Animatronic figure of this magnitude. What you are suggesting is incorrect and downplays the effort that went into this figure, which is silly at best and also totally misplaced.
Thank you for explaining that. I don't believe I ever downplayed the complexity of these machines. I also don't think it's unreasonable to draw on similarities from past examples of this model AA and apply them to how the new one is being developed. Simply casting someone as a conspiracy theorists because they have a different perspective (wrong or right) is certainly unbecoming.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
It’s a theory cooked up by @TP2000 and based on nothing more than his belief that the animatronic looks at least fifteen years older than the animated character. Why treat it as a legitimate rumour?

No, that's not accurate.

Like you do, I think the animatronic looks a bit older than her movie image. And she's certainly looking less glamorous in her bayou togs and mom-hairdo than she was in her Princess dress and glam updo.

What you are confusing me with is a series of posts/comments by @Disney Irish over in the Disneyland discussion that suggested the aging of Tiana wasn't news and is a purposeful move by WDI to set the ride (and also her Disneyland restaurant) years after the movie took place. From that information provided by Mr. Irish...

Tiana that has been doing the M&G at Tiana's Palace (I believe she still comes around) is also portrayed to be older similar to how she will look in the ride -

tianas-palace-disneyland-tiana-new-outfit-scaled.jpg
tianas-palace-disneyland-tiana-new-outfit-scaled.jpg

That's a weird decision to make from a merchandising and target-audience perspective.

Something tells me the "Older, Wiser, Career Woman with Mom-Hairdo Tiana" merchandise isn't going to sell as well with the target demographic of young girls as the "Young, Pretty, Glamorous, Princess Tiana" merchandise. :oops:
This isn't new information. The attraction announcement since day one has stated to be after the events of the movie, and subsequent information since has come out that its set years after the movie. Even the art work shows Tiana in new outfits and older than the movie. So not sure why this is now a surprise 3+ years later for some.

Mr. Irish said that as if the aging of Tiana was something we all knew was happening, when its apparent now that many of us didn't know that Tiana was going to be aged in the ride. Which would also seem to move the era of the ride into the Great Depression of the 1930's instead of the Roaring 20's the movie was set in.

What I'm still unclear on is if this aging of Tiana for the ride (and face character appearances at her Disneyland restaurant, and thus her future face character appearances at WDW also), is a purposeful decision? Does the ride really take place in the Great Depression now instead of the Roaring 20's of the movie?

Or is this just an unflattering debut of Tiana's new animatronic, paired with a questionable casting decision by Disneyland's Entertainment Department to make Tiana look noticeably older and less glamorous?
 

SplashJacket

Well-Known Member
I rode Secret Life of Pets out in Universal Hollywood with Jim Hill and Jim Shull (former WDI exec). One of the things we noticed was that the TMs really, really push down on that safety bar lock, even though the ride moves at like 1.5 miles per hour. And Shull theorized they do that so you don't jump out of the ride to take selfies with the pets. 100% believable.
A contrast of containment standards. One being too high and one likely being too low…
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom