News The Walt Disney Company Board of Directors Extends Robert A. Iger’s Contract as CEO Through 2026

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
Why does Josh need to be kept happy? I doubt you'd say the same if Walden was second pick.

That’s an odd accusation since I think they’ll pick her. So yea I think they need to keep her happy regardless… which involves picking her.

Josh is the only competent parks exec they’ve basically ever had. Disney has a deep pool of studio execs, whom yes the better ones I also hope are kept happy, but they aren’t up for the job.
 

HauntedPirate

Park nostalgist
Premium Member
Josh is the only competent parks exec they’ve basically ever had.

Spit Take Lol GIF by Justin
 

Nubs70

Well-Known Member
That’s an odd accusation since I think they’ll pick her. So yea I think they need to keep her happy regardless… which involves picking her.

Josh is the only competent parks exec they’ve basically ever had. Disney has a deep pool of studio execs, whom yes the better ones I also hope are kept happy, but they aren’t up for the job.
How about hire someone from outside the company that will manage the managers of the different divisions of $DIS. Someone humble enough that does not need to have his/her ego stroked by having to be seen as the "Face of the Parks"

Hiring internally from P&E to head up $DIS makes as much sense as hiring someone from consumer products to oversee $DIS.
 

Robbiem

Well-Known Member
How about hire someone from outside the company that will manage the managers of the different divisions of $DIS. Someone humble enough that does not need to have his/her ego stroked by having to be seen as the "Face of the Parks"

Hiring internally from P&E to head up $DIS makes as much sense as hiring someone from consumer products to oversee $DIS.

Let Elon take over - we could finally get Epcot city on mars 😀✌️
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
It’s entirely possible to defend Josh without diminishing the contributions of Dick Nunis and so many others.
Really? Ever? 😂 I find that quite literally, unbelievable.

As mentioned, the modern role starts with Paul Pressler. It’s pedantic, but it’s my point.

I’m happy to hear alternatives from the list. I do realize it’s perhaps the best of the worst, but it’s more to point out things can rapidly get worse.
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
Josh is the only competent parks exec they’ve basically ever had.
Josh’s legacy will be everything he said in D23 in 2024 that “dirt is moving” and is “in development” that NEVER happens…

In all fairness to Josh, Bob told him, “I have lied enough for this company, now you go out there and lie to them or I will get rid of you like I did Chapek!”
 

MR.Dis

Well-Known Member
That’s an odd accusation since I think they’ll pick her. So yea I think they need to keep her happy regardless… which involves picking her.

Josh is the only competent parks exec they’ve basically ever had. Disney has a deep pool of studio execs, whom yes the better ones I also hope are kept happy, but they aren’t up for the job.
There is one name that comes to mind as the best park exec--a guy named Walt Disney,
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
There is one name that comes to mind as the best park exec--a guy named Walt Disney,

Walt was never a park executive… my train of thought again is not putting Josh on top, but maintaining him in his role.

Again, I’m looking for an executive who is willing to push for their portfolio as being something that can be improved through ongoing major capital investment. Instead of being strategically planned and squeezed into the ground to appease their boss.

It’s about having a person in place who both seemingly likes their product (Chapek did) and sees the value of ongoing intensive capital expansion (Chapek didn’t) and understands what the general public actually wants. I’m not even convinced the other park execs ever liked the parks more than they did strategic planning. Many of them had outright disdain for experiences, which I don’t think Josh has demonstrated. A shockingly rare, modern feature.

Though a sad number of members thought Jay Rasulo should be CEO, so I’m not surprised I’m facing this much push back for what should be a fairly nothing comment.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
In 6 to 10 years, let’s see how much of what Josh announced at 2024’s D23 actually happened. Until then, Josh is just another stuffed shirt.

I’ll go 5 (2029). I’m pretty happy to stick him to that timeline minus two of the cruise ships which I have strong faith cannot be walked back contractually without major penalties.
 

CosmicDuck

Well-Known Member
Is there a reason everyone stopped discussing the option of Co-CEOs? I've had my money on a Walden/D'Amaro announcement for years now.

Dana is a very strong leader and a very close personal friend of Igers. But Wall Street does not believe in the content business and signaling her as the future of the company is a mistake (i.e. look to Chapek).

D'Amaro is affable and charismatic, and has a steady hand on the wheel of the business that actually makes the company money (putting everyone's personal opinions aside here). But lacks some of the leadership chops Dana has and the industry relationships that she has fostered (ala Iger).

I still see a world where they explore the pairing. I think the company would like to lean towards Dana, and like D'Amaro but think he's a bit green. But they each have what the other lacks.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom