News The Walt Disney Company Board of Directors Extends Robert A. Iger’s Contract as CEO Through 2026

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Nobody has said they will go bankrupt.


And I would not be surprised to see this ending with TWDC declaring Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
 

Tom P.

Well-Known Member
You're right, I forgot she mentioned that! Fair point.

That said, if a story is good, but redundant, is it still worth producing?
Objection, Your Honor. Assumes facts not in evidence. 😂

You are assuming that there are problems with the story -- such as it being redundant -- other than simply the race of the characters.

First off, I'd submit that I see nothing in Disney's recent history that suggests they would be averse to producing a redundant or derivative story. Heck, what percentage of their big tentpole feature film releases over the past several years have been live action remakes of previous animated films? What percentage of their TV shows are spinoffs, sequels, adaptations, etc.? Just how many Marvel movies can they make? I think Disney does "redundant" ad nauseum, in fact.

But, setting that aside, I still see nothing in her comments that suggest that kind of motivation. Again, this was a discussion specifically about how they are making their products more "diverse" and "inclusive." The only facts that she presented us were that they got a good script with a good story, but turned it down because the main characters were white. That's it. The clear implication is that they would have produced the script if the characters had been of another race. She, in her own words, makes it clear that race was the deciding factor.

And I want to be clear here. I'm certainly not suggesting that Disney can't or shouldn't produce shows with non-white main characters. But I think for an entertainment company which is admittedly having trouble right now to just make a blanket statement that they are just not doing anything that features white people anymore is problematic at best.
 

_caleb

Well-Known Member
The principles of Diversity Inclusion and Equity require that the script be awarded to the oppressed character. Even if the script is inferior.
Where are the principles that say this?
The clear implication is that
Your interpretation is only clear to those intent on hearing everything through an ideological lens not shared by the speaker.
a blanket statement that they are just not doing anything that features white people anymore is problematic at best.
Here you’ve introduced additional things not present in the comment you’re referring to.

Don’t you guys keep complaining about gender— and race—swapping in Disney films? If Disney had a good script that featured a White protagonist, don’t you think the they’d just swap the characters or something if that was their only goal?
 

MerlinTheGoat

Well-Known Member

Dranth

Well-Known Member
If there was anyone who was still delusional enough to think that Peltz was a force of positive change for Disney, hopefully this puts a definitive end to any of that ridiculous nonsense. If you thought Iger was rock bottom and things couldn't possibly get any worse, woof...
Some are so blinded by their hate of Iger (earned or not) that they will fall for it.
 

MerlinTheGoat

Well-Known Member
Some are so blinded by their hate of Iger (earned or not) that they will fall for it.
I absolutely detest Iger, he's awful. But there are no heroes in this conflict, no remotely decent choices on the table. Understanding that Peltz/Rasulo would be an even worse choice is simply admitting that we're forced into harm reduction mode to pick the lesser evil. And that IS a sad fact of the matter...
 

GimpYancIent

Well-Known Member
I absolutely detest Iger, he's awful. But there are no heroes in this conflict, no remotely decent choices on the table. Understanding that Peltz/Rasulo would be an even worse choice is simply admitting that we're forced into harm reduction mode to pick the lesser evil. And that IS a sad fact of the matter...
Fair to say things are boiling down to accepting the lesser of the evils.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
The principles of Diversity Inclusion and Equity require that the script be awarded to the oppressed character. Even if the script is inferior.

Disney needs to produce a good story that the customer wants.
She never said "because of DEI we're choosing lesser but more diverse scripts". The presumption of her remarks is that, all things being equal, the more diverse scripted win.
 

Dranth

Well-Known Member
I absolutely detest Iger, he's awful. But there are no heroes in this conflict, no remotely decent choices on the table. Understanding that Peltz/Rasulo would be an even worse choice is simply admitting that we're forced into harm reduction mode to pick the lesser evil. And that IS a sad fact of the matter...
I can see why people look at it that way. I'm not a fan of Iger but I look at him as more of a symptom of modern business so expect similar or worse going forward. What I have no doubt of, Peltz represents that worse in every possible way so yes, Iger is absolutely the lesser of two evils.
 

TalkingHead

Well-Known Member
Not rhetorical, what’s worse than Iger? At some point you have to accept the company is on a trajectory that doesn’t depend on specific management personalities.
 

DCBaker

Premium Member
Original Poster
Here's the new statement from Disney on the Peltz news.

The Walt Disney Company (NYSE: DIS) confirmed today that Trian Fund Management, L.P., alongside certain affiliates, including Trian’s previously disclosed partnership with Isaac Perlmutter pursuant to which it obtained beneficial ownership of Mr. Perlmutter’s Disney shares (collectively, “Trian”), has provided notice of its intent to nominate two individuals for election to the Company’s Board of Directors at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Disney has an experienced, diverse, and highly qualified Board that is focused on the long-term performance of the Company, strategic growth initiatives including the ongoing transformation of its businesses, the succession planning process, and increasing shareholder value.

The Governance and Nominating Committee, which evaluates director nominations, will review the proposed Trian nominees and provide a recommendation to the Board as part of its governance process.

The Company expects to file preliminary materials with respect to the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), which will include the Board’s recommended slate of director nominees. Disney shareholders are not required to take any action at this time.

 

Dranth

Well-Known Member
Not rhetorical, what’s worse than Iger? At some point you have to accept the company is on a trajectory that doesn’t depend on specific management personalities.
Peltz.

Iger can go and I doubt many here will shed any tears at this point, but you can't replace him with someone who's beholden to a guy whose entire business strategy is finding undervalued companies so he can go in and sell off the parts for profit leaving a gutted shell of a company that he then claims is in great shape.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom