The Spirited Sixth Sense ...

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
74 have you heard any mention of having a Snow White/dwarfs M&G once mine train opens? Also, it looks like they are finally moving along. When do you think it might be open?

No. But meet-greet-and-gropes are what people spend $9,000 on MAGICal WDW vacations according to arrested development lifestylers who wound travel across the country to see a teen dressed as Darkwing Duck ... but let's leave Mrs. Ricky's hubby out of this.

As to the coaster opening, who really knows? Disney can't even set a date for a parade ...

How in 1979, they could say EPCOT Center will open on 10/1/82 and do it ... like a different UNIverse.
 

NowInc

Well-Known Member

Sad as it is tho that Companies like ILM take advantage of their reputation and in return get away with paying their effects guys VERY little. (You'd be shocked to hear how low the salaries are of the average Effects worker). Basically the only reason the employees put up with is so that they can say "I worked on star wars!". I know its off topic, but felt like ranting about it :)
 

ChrisFL

Premium Member
Is that legit or just a goof? Sounds like it be a fun take if it's a goof. If legit, just one more example of the sad state WDW is in and how it's being dumped on by the people in charge.

It's legitimate and very, very strange. You'd think they could come up with another way of saying it.
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Hey, I loved the brand for decades. Truly.

And WDW deserved that love for decades. Truly.

It really was magical.

But I'm also not blind enough to not see that Iger & co. are dumping all over the "BRAND" in Orlando right now.

And I really get tired of alleged "fans" of WDW write that they don't let the little stuff bother them.

Don't they understand that it was both the big and the little stuff that separated WDW from everyone else, that made WDW truly great?

Gawd, I can't want for a change in the way corporate Disney treats Orlando.

I never loved the BRAND. I loved the creative output of the company from films to theme parks. I still do for some things.

But the BRAND? No. I am sure some of it is semantics, but anyone who visited the MK during its first 25 years or EPCOT during its first 15 realizes that those places stood for vastly different things than they do now. Now, they are simply ads for the Disney BRAND. Why the hell else would you have the idea that 'Disney should replace Maelstrom with a Frozen ride' ... I mean, how much must you fundamentally not get EPCOT to utter those words?
 
Last edited:

Pumbas Nakasak

Heading for the great escape.
Was there ever any truth to that a rumour?

British%2Bhumour.jpg
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Not to get too far off topic, but what does everyone think about Comcast buying Time Warner Cable? Probably not all that relevant to the theme parks, but I would think it would give Comcast some additional leverage when dealing with a company like Disney that provides the content.

Huge deal, no doubt. Not sure whether they paid too much, but it does give them considerable power in the transmission game.

At the same point, it is about content. Having an oil pipeline with no oil makes it worthless.
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Hi Spirit, I just came across a very interesting thread on the WDW General Discussion about the change of WDW visitors and this very insightfull post just stood out. I thought it would touch upon some of the issues that regularly are debated on this thread and previous @WDW1974 threads, so I am quoting it over here:

Thanks.

And I think that post has loads of truths in it, but it only tells part of the tale.

WDW still gets the majority of visitors from the good, old US of A. It's largest secondary market is still the UK. Have South and Central American become a larger piece of the pie? Absolutely. Sorta like how wealthy Russians and Eastern Europeans now flock to DLP (someone should tell them to go to Europa instead, right?:D)

It's all part of the puzzle of the Walmarting of WDW.

I think that post nails a big piece of it.
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Oh I totally get it. I love sports, and it annoys me that I cannot get playoffs over the Internet.

However the NFL blackout rules can totally just kiss mine… i'm stuck watching either Tampa Bay or the Miami Dolphins. Which is why I frankly just don't give a toss.

O-Town was always considered a Dolphins home market until the Jags came into existence. Indeed, the local stations started taking a lot of heat when they couldn't show Fins game because the NFL had decided they were now going to be a Jax market. I find it all amusing because all three teams are so bad that I don't know who would want to watch any of them.
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Yep. This is a big deal for anyone who provides content. Disney just happens to be the largest. 30 million customers is massive and they will have incredible leverage. This still has to get government approval, but Comcast is savvy enough to skirt around that issue.

I just hope any setbacks for ESPN don't lead to a further pull back in spending on the parks. That would be unfortunate. On the flip side, more cash generated from cable subscribers means more cash for Comcast to spend on the Universal parks. I read that Comcast already said they would increase share buybacks after this deal closes, but I'm sure they will keep some of the extra cash generated for growth.

I would not read anything involving any theme parks, let alone Disney's, from this smart Comcast move.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom