Can someone please tell me what the point of The Simpsons having any significant presence in WDW would be if this already exists?
Disney own the Simpsons because they are a good way to sell Disney+. Not sure about US, but advertising for Disney+ in the UK relied heavily on the fact they have all episodes ever of the Simpsons and they are the only place you can stream the back catalogue.
I agree that putting Simpsons in WDW would be overkill while USO has a Simpsons mini-land. But that doesn't mean they can't appear in other Disney parks, nor come to WDW if Universal ever decides to pack up their Simpsons land.
Indeed. Disney has doubled down over and over again on embracing The Simpsons as part of "The Disney Umbrella of Brands." Some may not like that decision, but, it's done.
I agree that putting Simpsons in WDW would be overkill while USO has a Simpsons mini-land. But that doesn't mean they can't appear in other Disney parks, nor come to WDW if Universal ever decides to pack up their Simpsons land.
You can definitely see it when Henson and Disney brought Dinosaurs to ABC..The muppets are known for slapstick humour and loveable nostalgia. Frank Oz refused to do the reboot of the Muppets because of a fart joke. How are the compatible to The Simpsons?!
The show was still pulling in about 4.8 million views per episode last year.My guess is that if/when Universal replaces the Simpsons land, the IP will no longer be relevant enough for Disney to bother spending money to add it to WDW.
The show was still pulling in about 4.8 million views per episode last year.
Personally, even I have started to get into it a bit more. It's like a slightly tamer Family Guy. I've grown to love it when, before Disney+ came along, I honestly just didn't care about it.
I'm still not so sure about that. Simpsons are still amazingly profitable. Especially if they just have a singular attraction with a gift shop and a cafe that offers duff bear. Just like Universal Orlando's area. That'd be enough Simpsons. It'd fit good in HS.Oh, I know it's still relatively popular, if nowhere near what it was in the 1990s (they had episodes with 30+ million viewers back then, although of course the TV market has also changed).
My point was more that Universal likely won't going to get replace the area as long as the Simpsons are still somewhat popular. If they do ever decide to dump it, Disney will almost certainly have many other properties they'd prefer to leverage. I actually think that's already true right now -- that Disney has many other IPs they'd want to leverage at the parks before the Simpsons, even if there was no Springfield at USO -- but will be increasingly so as the years pass.
I'm still not so sure about that. Simpsons are still amazingly profitable. Especially if they just have a singular attraction with a gift shop and a cafe that offers duff bear. Just like Universal Orlando's area. That'd be enough Simpsons. It'd fit good in HS.
I agree with all of that.Sure, they are right now. I'm saying I don't think Universal will shut down their Simpsons area until it's no longer bringing in guests/money, and once that's the case, there wouldn't be any reason for Disney to build something (I'm assuming Disney wouldn't/can't build anything as long as it still exists at USO).
I agree with all of that.
On MY end, I was just stating if they were to be in Disney, I'd accept them at HS.
Honestly, if Disney wanted to purchase the theme park rights and just put Simpsons replacing Star Tours in that corner, I would (personally) be down with that. That'd be the perfect simpsons presence... It even has the gift shop (kwik-e-mart), and they could also transform backlot express into the dining area Universal has.They'd fit in fine at DHS (as would basically anything at this point), although DHS really needs any further expansions to focus on attractions. I'm sure Imagineering could come up with something, but I have a hard time envisioning anything that would be significantly different than what currently exists at USO. They could at least cut down on the motion sickness factor, of course.
Could we see anything relating to the Simpsons at the Disney parks?
I'll just leave this here....You're dead if you aim only for kids. Adults are only kids grown up, anyway. - Walt Disney
That said, while I think any IP could be made to work with the right creative team and budget, I still say Futurama is the better of the two options. Might be just the right IP to inject some "grownupness" back into Magic Kingdom.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.