Rich T
Well-Known Member
Yes, but Big Thunder Ranch/Barbecue was designed by 1980’s Imagineering. No IP required.But now you have a tunnel and a cart outside selling light up toys in its place. WDI designed this iteration too. So immersive.
Yes, but Big Thunder Ranch/Barbecue was designed by 1980’s Imagineering. No IP required.But now you have a tunnel and a cart outside selling light up toys in its place. WDI designed this iteration too. So immersive.
why does DL’s tomorrowland look like this?Why does MK’s Tomorrowland look like this???
View attachment 767700
Because of a poor attempt to recreate Paris' Discoveryland on basically no budget.why does DL’s tomorrowland look like this?
View attachment 767812View attachment 767813View attachment 767814
To what extent is the Rocket Rods mechanism still in the track?why does DL’s tomorrowland look like this?
View attachment 767812View attachment 767813View attachment 767814
Because of a poor attempt to recreate Paris' Discoveryland on basically no budget.
Wait, you lament the loss of a BBQ joint? It’s not like there are 20 million BBQ places sprinkled throughout every state in America LOL
No argument from me here! Both MK and DL have bad TLs, IMO—each weak in its own ways. DL wins the prize for abandoned-junk-in-plain-sight, though.why does DL’s tomorrowland look like this?
View attachment 767812View attachment 767813View attachment 767814
I should think changing attitudes to animal welfare have something to do with it.Now in 2024 the only live animals in the park are the horses for the streetcars on Main Street. All of the other animals are now gone, done in by budget cuts, or perhaps budget shifts. And victim to a growing lack of showmanship.
I'd go further and say that there's no such thing as a good Tomorrowland or Tomorrowland equivalent anywhere at the moment.No argument from me here! Both MK and DL have bad TLs, IMO—each weak in its own ways. DL wins the prize for abandoned-junk-in-plain-sight, though.
If I was CEO in a universe where I could ignore all complications, I would gather the necessary people in a conference room, point a frustratingly shaking finger at a photo of 1968 DL Tomorrowland and say, “Just do THIS again! It’s better than what we’ve had ever since! This is pretty! This is pleasing! It’s kinetic! It’s okay if it’s outdated in some ways! This is Disney’s Tomorrowland; it’s its own thing, and it *works!* Call it Tomorrowland Classic! But keep Space Mountain and update Flight to the Moon to make it good!”I'd go further and say that there's no such thing as a good Tomorrowland or Tomorrowland equivalent anywhere at the moment.
All have their problems and thematic/atmospheric inconsistencies.
The only good Tomorrowlands exist in the past.
I really wish they’d put something on the people mover track; even if it was a small scale non-rideable vehicle that gave them a purpose and some motion.DL wins the prize for abandoned-junk-in-plain-sight, though.
I should think changing attitudes to animal welfare have something to do with it.
A good thing in my opinion.
It’s not a criticism of the CMs specifically, but of (petting) zoos as an institution. A few short decades ago, not many people took issue with circus animals, and look where we are now. I believe the very idea of animal entertainment will become anathema within the next fifty years.That seems to imply that the animals cared for by the Circle D Cast Members were being mistreated in some way.
I believe a properly-run petting zoo of domesticated farm animals, where the animals are well-cared for, have lots of room to wander or just get away by themselves if they choose, are a great thing. As long as there is enough staff to prevent jerk guests from misbehaving, petting zoos can teach a greater appreciation of animals. For many, this is their only encounter with goats, chickens donkeys, ponies etc. and it can form lasting, impactful memories.It’s not a criticism of the CMs specifically, but of (petting) zoos as an institution. A few short decades ago, not many people took issue with circus animals, and look where we are now. I believe the very idea of animal entertainment will become anathema within the next fifty years.
I don't believe a crowded theme park is (from the animals' perspective) a good environment for such a facility. Nor am I convinced that petting zoos—or zoos of any kind—teach humans greater respect for animals.I believe a properly-run petting zoo of domesticated farm animals, where the animals are well-cared for, have lots of room to wander or just get away by themselves if they choose, are a great thing. As long as there is enough staff to prevent jerk guests from misbehaving, petting zoos can teach a greater appreciation of animals. For many, this is their only encounter with goats, chickens donkeys, ponies etc. and it can form lasting, impactful memories.
Speaking from personal experience, I come from a family of animal-fans (three of us at one point wanted to be farm vets at some point in our lives!) and occasional petting zoo visits were a much-loved and fondly remembered part of our lives. And I love a well-run zoo or not-a-zoo. When you look an animal in the eye, live, they become more than abstract concepts or distant scenery. This is an experience I think benefits everyone.I don't believe a crowded theme park is (from the animals' perspective) a good environment for such a facility. Nor am I convinced that petting zoos—or zoos of any kind—teach humans greater respect for animals.
Just my perspective. I'm not looking to change your mind, or anyone else's.
I appreciate your perspective, even if I don't agree with it. Regardless of how either of us feels on the matter, I think it's fair to say that there is a general (and ongoing) shift away from animal shows and exhibits. Quite how far that shift will go is unclear, and my prediction for the future may well be wrong. But the idea of Disney today opening a zoo is almost inconceivable, such is the change that's come about since as recently as the '90s, when Animal Kingdom opened.Speaking from personal experience, I come from a family of animal-fans (three of us at one point wanted to be farm vets at some point in our lives!) and occasional petting zoo visits were a much-loved and fondly remembered part of our lives. And I love a well-run zoo or not-a-zoo. When you look an animal in the eye, live, they become more than abstract concepts or distant scenery. This is an experience I think benefits everyone.
But, heck, I grew up in the 60’s. I used to fret about the safety of the live chickens running around freely in the Knott’s parking lot.
I think the best existing (we don’t need more) zoos and animal parks can serve as important research, rehabilitation, and education centers. As well as, sadly, necessary arks. Many species could be wiped out by poaching, environmental change or plague, and I do think it’s important to have “safe” animals in reserve against disaster. In multiple locations, if possible.I appreciate your perspective, even if I don't agree with it. Regardless of how either of us feels on the matter, I think it's fair to say that there is an ongoing general shift away from animal shows and exhibits. Quite how far that shift will go is unclear, and my prediction for the future may well be wrong. But the idea of Disney today opening a zoo is almost inconceivable, such is the change that's come about since as recently as the '90s, when Animal Kingdom opened.
But the idea of Disney today opening a zoo is almost inconceivable, such is the change that's come about since as recently as the '90s, when Animal Kingdom opened.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.