• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

The Mandalorian & Grogu (Lucasfilm - 2026 Theatrical)

monothingie

The Most Positive Member on the Forum ™
Premium Member
In defense of some here, it was reported earlier this year that because of the recent increase in California's Film Tax credit Mando/Grogu is currently set at a budget of $166.4M. Making it one of the cheapest SW movies in the modern era.


Now with reshoots (if any) we don't know what that will do. But at the very least its starting off as a more modest budget for a blockbuster.

We'll see how things go between now and its release date next summer.
I believe that was prior to the movie finishing post production. It also does not account for any marketing.

If it finishes at around 200 million before marketing that would be in line to be considered cheap for Disney.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I believe that was prior to the movie finishing post production. It also does not account for any marketing.

If it finishes at around 200 million before marketing that would be in line to be considered cheap for Disney.
…post production prices have seem to have gone to $0 since they began tanking 3/4s of their slate every year 🤔
 
Last edited:

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
I was just reading about that the other day Nimoy would only come back for 3 if he got to do the story for 4…and shatner only went along with 4 if he got to control 5

Tangled web.

The best thing is they ended on and even number…because undiscovered country maybe holds up the best of them all
Nimoy was fine, but the only reason the Star Trek franchise took a bold leap from the 60’s into the 80’s/90’s was Nicholas Meyer.
 

MoonRakerSCM

Well-Known Member
or during the Super Bowl (which would fit better given the scene of spectators cheering on Rotta the Hutt in the arena fits with people cheering on teams at the Super Bowl)
Is this how marketing works? There's a crowd at a sport event in a scene so we should push it to a crowd at a sport event? If anything it appears to be a fighting arena, should Disney advertising focus on WWE?
Aw... I actually really enjoued The Lone Ranger. The (long) ending train sequence woth the extended Lone Ranger theme is glorious.
 

mysto

Well-Known Member
In defense of some here, it was reported earlier this year that because of the recent increase in California's Film Tax credit Mando/Grogu is currently set at a budget of $166.4M. Making it one of the cheapest SW movies in the modern era.


Now with reshoots (if any) we don't know what that will do. But at the very least its starting off as a more modest budget for a blockbuster.

We'll see how things go between now and its release date next summer.

They have already built developed and paid for the infrastructure they're presumably going to use to shoot this (the volume) while shooting all the previous series. People at the studio are well versed in working all the pieces of it. I'm sure they will build out some improvements to their process but the costs should be relatively modest compared to a ground-up effort.

I always like all the SW series and movies, I'll have fun with it, and my cost to see it will be modest. Yes I think a lot of them could have been better, or even a lot better, but it's not a big deal to me. As monothingie says it might just be Grogu parading around for 2 hours with Pedro, which is still worth my $5 or whatever it turns out to be.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
I believe that was prior to the movie finishing post production. It also does not account for any marketing.

If it finishes at around 200 million before marketing that would be in line to be considered cheap for Disney.
Obviously that is before marketing and post-production. That is basically what I’m saying.

However even still this is still starting out to be one of the cheapest SW movies of the Disney era, and one of their more modest budgeted blockbusters of the modern era. I also haven’t see reports of reshoots being needed, but we still have a few months. So it still could come in under $200M which would be great I think.
 

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
You guys are so negative for no reason.

This looks good, even if the convention-exclusive trailers were better.

It won’t make a billion like other Disney+-turned theatrical movies like Moana 2 and live-action Lilo & Stitch did.

But it’ll be a decent hit with $500M WW against a $144.65-$166.4M budget.
Some might say you're to positive for no reason.

Star wars will have been off the big screen for over 6yrs when this hits the theater. I'm sorry but a break even modest box office isn't what people are hoping for at this point. Sure there will be more trailers, and hopefully they'll be better. But this is star wars, one of the premier franchises to ever exist. And this is the best they can do? This is where they needed to pull up the bootstraps and make sure you release something that blows peoples mind. Not a grogu highlight reel that looks and feels like a tv show.

And if that isn't reflective of the film. Still, shame on them. Its not like they had to rush something out. It finished filming the end of last year. They've had plenty of time to get a solid teaser out. And as been shown, a lackluster first showing can give your film an uphill battle at release.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Some might say you're to positive for no reason.

Star wars will have been off the big screen for over 6yrs when this hits the theater. I'm sorry but a break even modest box office isn't what people are hoping for at this point. Sure there will be more trailers, and hopefully they'll be better. But this is star wars, one of the premier franchises to ever exist. And this is the best they can do? This is where they needed to pull up the bootstraps and make sure you release something that blows peoples mind. Not a grogu highlight reel that looks and feels like a tv show.

And if that isn't reflective of the film. Still, shame on them. Its not like they had to rush something out. It finished filming the end of last year. They've had plenty of time to get a solid teaser out. And as been shown, a lackluster first showing can give your film an uphill battle at release.
I think there’s a better than 50/50 chance that both this and Robert Downey Doom
Are both poorly written slop…

And I don’t want that…but when it quacks and waddles…it’s probably a duck
 

Mr Ferret 75

Thank you sir. You were an inspiration.
Premium Member
I think there’s a better than 50/50 chance that both this and Robert Downey Doom
Are both poorly written slop…

And I don’t want that…but when it quacks and waddles…it’s probably a duck
platypus GIF
 

DKampy

Well-Known Member
While I agree with you…the teaser implied tone and intent.
We will see what happens… there was a few shots I have seen between the two trailers that suggest there maybe some scenes that were filmed with the theater experience in mind…. At any rate I will see this in theaters…. As I am open to watching most types of films in the theater…. And if it still ends up being 2 really good episodes put together… I will be happy
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom