beachlover4444
Well-Known Member
Hahaha I just laughed so hard I cried. I thought the same thing, an old sickly Jon
Hahaha I just laughed so hard I cried. I thought the same thing, an old sickly Jon
Rumored replacement:Let's hope that or another patriotic song is added.
I can’t believe he ok this as his likeness. Does he get a say on it? Or just the audio?I'm not into conspiracy theories, well....I am, just not publicly. But this one has my vote. I was thinking the same thing.
His suit fits awful, he wears form fitted expensive suits, that was the first thing I noticed.
His suit fits awful, he wears form fitted expensive suits, that was the first thing I noticed.
I’m so conflicted over this. The imagineers HAVE to be better than this. Are they not up to the level of skill of their predecessors? Did they fire a bunch of talent? Was it done on purpose to mock or discredit? Either scenario seems a stretch. I just can’t imagine why the look of this AA is so off.
The sculpture is just that, a solid work of art that the artist has complete control over. The AAs are a latex mold of the original face placed over the various mechanisms that cause the facial movements.
WDI has done a much better job than this at creating AAs based on real people or characters portrayed by real people, for example, Great Moments with Mr. Lincoln.
Now, here’s an example of what’s currently possible with AAs (Disney’s term, but it has become ubiquitous for all theme park robots)
As far as facial and head movements are concerned, this example is well beyond the capabilities of any AA WDI has created. Clearly, there’s room for Imagineering to improve and explore. But does Disney want to invest? It is sad that they can’t at least live up to (what should be) their standard, GMwML.
It's worth noting that by the time this opened, it was shortly after 9/11, when 43's approval numbers were at their highest. He was seen as a true leader in the face of immense tragedy. With 45's approval numbers sitting around the lowest they've been, it's no great surprise that they didn't do any fanfare for him.http://www.yesterland.com/presidents.html
I just read this great Yesterland article about HoP and got a kick out of the decorations in this picture celebrating the addition of George W. Bush. Like there's no way this would have happened today for 45:
WDI has done a much better job than this at creating AAs based on real people or characters portrayed by real people, for example, Great Moments with Mr. Lincoln.
Now, here’s an example of what’s currently possible with AAs (Disney’s term, but it has become ubiquitous for all theme park robots)
As far as facial and head movements are concerned, this example is well beyond the capabilities of any AA WDI has created. Clearly, there’s room for Imagineering to improve and explore. But does Disney want to invest? It is sad that they can’t at least live up to (what should be) their standard, GMwML.
Well that's not something to be proud ofIt got linked by Breitbart (the video).
It is part of what drove a lot of traffic to it, is my point.Well that's not something to be proud of
The Hillary face theory is topping news sites social media right now... A little conspiracy-ish but not implausible, and definitely an interesting possibility.
Given that Disney did claim to be making AAs for both candidates, I wonder if they maybe tried to create one sculpt that could fit both faces, then making final changes (hair, make-up, costume) based on who actually won? Thereby resulting in a face with elements of both candidates. It might have been a money-saving tactic to reduce waste.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.