I would say the detail is an issue, as well. It’s all too hyper detailed compared to places like Main Street, New Orleans Square, or Frontierland. While impressive, it doesn’t “fit.” That said, I agree about the RotR area. I’d like to see more of that space whenever possible.
Scale of the park is a mathematical guideline to keep the park consistent from land to land. Not exactly a subjective issue. Even if it was initially built that way because of budget, it still must be consistent throughout the park. If Disney wants to build outside of that scale they can do it at other parks (as they have at the Magic Kingdom).
We've been through this...
They are saying that SW:GE has the potential to bring in as much as $14B in additional revenue to the region over the next 4 decades.
That’s not because of subjectivity, it’s because you know less about theme park design.
Well good thing its in an area of the park where you can avoid it at all together and not have to see how inconsistent it is to the theme park rules you deride Disney for breaking.
I’m still interested in Galaxy’s Edge (once RotR opens), but to say it’s as good as it can be is false. They definitely have had several missteps along the way.Well good thing its in an area of the park where you can avoid it at all together and not have to see how inconsistent it is to the theme park rules you deride Disney for breaking.
If they wrote the rules, that’s all the more reason to follow them. That’s like giving a pass to the US government for violating the Constitution since the US government wrote the Constitution.Rules I might add that they themselves wrote, and that they themselves have changed over time. Remember its their park not ours, they just let us in for a visit that why we're called guests.
Of course there have been missteps, no one I think is denying that. However what those missteps are will vary from person to person depending on their point-of-view.
And just like these rules, the Constitution can and has been changed in the past and will again in the future. Neither is a set of rules written in stone. One is a set of design techniques that is meant to be changed over time. The other is a set of values written over 200 years ago that the framers intended to be changed over time as our country grew and matured.
I'm sorry we don't tell people not to share their opinions here.
The rules which decide what is good and what is bad do not change based on time. One's view on what is good and what is bad may change based on education, but even before one knows what is good and what is bad it is still set. Even if you have no personal problem with the lack of consistency in scale between Galaxy's Edge and the rest of the park, you're not the defining factor here. The lack of consistency in scale between Galaxy's Edge and the rest of the park is a design failure by the Imagineers.
Um, yes time does change what is good and what is bad. That is what time does, changes things. Fruit for example changes from being good to being bad over time. Our opinions as a society change the concepts of what is good and what is bad based on the passage of time. Something that was once perceived as bad can be perceived as good all based on the passage of time, and vice-versa.
False. A fresh piece of fruit is always good, a rotten piece of fruit is always bad. What changes is the state of the fruit due to time, but not what makes it good or bad. If someone likes rotten fruit, that's not because rotten fruit is good, it's because that person is bad.
