'Strange World' Disney's 2022 Animated Film

jeangreyforever

Active Member
I agree with your overall point. It’s your framing that I didn’t quite understand, and while I still don’t think “old-fashioned” really characterises it well (in the UK, for example, there is widespread anti-trans feeling even among otherwise very “progressive” people), I thank you for clarifying what you meant.
I'm not British so I can't speak much about the British sentiment towards transgender people but I have noticed that the UK has a very disturbing amount of transphobia, much higher than even in the US. I don't know why it is but there's a reason most TERFs, including the infamous JK Rowling, all hail from the UK. I'm very curious to know why that is because even Americans seem accepting in comparison to the British. I have a British aunt who is quite progressive as well, and certainly doesn't have a problem with gays and lesbians, but transgender people she cannot understand. She's very similar to JK Rowling ideology-wise which is disheartening. I'm not sure what there is in the water there but the trend I've noticed is that a lot of the TERFs are very staunch feminists, but the faux-feminist, man-hating kind who generally had bad experiences with men and have basically sworn them off. For some reason they can't seem to distinguish between men and transgender women which is why they go so hard after transgender women and refuse to empathize with them.

But in that sense too, I think the reason old-fashioned can still apply is that even though transgender people have existed for eons, their existence has really only been pushed by the media in the last couple of years. Gays and lesbians have had a longer time for their existence to percolate and become known and eventually accepted (or somewhat accepted) whereas the trans community is still in the very early stages and there are a lot of misconceptions that exist about them still. Which is why I think old-fashioned works because transpeople are too "new" for many who would consider themselves liberals or progressives. They need more time to understand the trans community. Hillary Clinton is a good example because she's spoken openly about how she didn't really understand the trans community and wasn't quite so accepting but her daughter Chelsea instantly was. And they both agreed that it was probably a generational thing and Chelsea was helping to educate Hillary.
 

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
Totally agree with that, but Robin Williams and Bob Saget were all well-known household celebrity names by then, particularly Robin Williams. I still think of Mork & Mindy first when ever anyone says his name, then his huge catalog of wonderful films and funny appearances on Johnny Carson fill in the rest for me.

Jaboukie is a minor C List celebrity who very few Americans know. So when you read his raunchy song lyrics or his equally raunchy interview answers, it's shocking. And a really weird casting decision considering many parents are already on the defensive with Disney's latest family cartoons.

Out of curiosity @CaptainAmerica, have you read his song lyrics and/or seen his latest music video?

To me it just comes across as them doubling down. Like “look how progressive we are!” Like you said he’s not a well known actor. What’s the point? And yet the people at Disney made the decision to cast him. Which is why I said they need to do a little cleaning house because there seems to be no check and balances going on in there.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Pretty much every celebrity is degenerate at best and abhorrent at worst so I need to sever some things in order to be at peace with consuming any pop culture whatsoever.

Agreed. When I lived in SoCal I had that point graphically shown to me on several occasions via brushes with "celebrity greatness", as David Letterman used to say. It's a smarmy and fake industry full of smarmy and fake people.

Hollywood! 🤢

I still have a short list of favorite actors and actresses and entertainers though that I try to protect in my mind as different and better, almost normal people. Catherine O'Hara, Dean Martin, Eugene Levy, Jennifer Coolidge, etc.

But the vast majority of the rest? Generally awful people who are fake and smarmy. But then, they're actors so they can act normal and kind when the camera turns on. 😞
 

jeangreyforever

Active Member
All valid stuff! And I agree with almost every word. (I have a few different nuances on the trans community, but not worth digging into)

This relates to Strange World because there's now this monolith of thought by many in Hollywood and corporate media that any objection to gay content in a children's animated movie equals objection to gay content as a whole, and thus the person who objects to it is a bigot and hateful person to be scorned.

When in reality, the average parents of 8 year old boys who paused on buying tickets to Strange World are probably not bigoted hate-mongers. They just have reservations about introducing homosexuality to their children at that young age, among many other mature topics. They'd likely be more comfortable with it at 14 or older though. Or perhaps not at all? That's their sacred right as parents to instill cultural values in their children; hence the dramatically worse box office performance of Strange World in majority Catholic countries, for example.

I have no opposition to gay characters in PG-13 or R rated movies, like the recent Marvel films that have gay characters. I still think there's work to be done to make those gay characters more natural and organic to the storyline, but the script writers are improving there. Or they are getting better at managing directives from HR.

But I do have opposition to gay characters in PG rated family animated films like Lightyear or Strange World. It's pushing the envelope too hard at too young an age demographic, and it's a bad business decision. And yet I'm still a gay man after coming to that conclusion. Diversity!
It reminds me of the box office disaster that was Bros. The media painted such a picture that if you didn't go watch the movie to support the first mainstream romantic gay comedy as a hit (and I'm not entirely sure it was really the first anyway but ok), you were a bigot. And the problem was that even if you forget straight audiences, it was gay audiences who weren't showing up. The community that the movie was made for. The gay community was not interested in Bros at all.

Even for Strange World, I have to wonder why Disney felt this should be their first movie with a gay protagonist. Maybe they thought that making it an action-adventure science fiction movie with a diverse, ensemble cast and a father-son relationship would somehow cancel out the "gayness" and make people who would otherwise not be interested in watching it feel slightly better about paying for a ticket. I'm not sure, but it certainly didn't feel like a movie aimed at the gay community and I don't know any gay friends of mine, Disney fans or non-Disney fans, who were even remotely interested. There's a reason Elsa and Ariel are gay icons, whereas no one would ever claim that about the protagonist of this movie. So not only did Disney probably lost the more conservative audience by including a gay protagonist, they certainly didn't get the gay audience either by making a character who seems to hold virtually no appeal to them.

I don't personally have an issue with gay characters in children's movies, but that being said, I know many parents who do and would not screen this for their kids. Disney needs to remember that whenever they've always been a family friendly company and even going back to the days of Walt, their movies catered to the entire family. Walt didn't pander to kids only because he knew parents were the ones who bought tickets and Disney movies need to be a whole family event. Even with the introduction of other animation movies from competitive studios, Disney (as well as Pixar) still has the advantage because movies like Ice Age or Minions usually cater just to kids and not parents and families in general. Disney has gradually been losing their status as family friendly. Previous attempts to appear cool to teens and target them instead of their main demographic have all been flops. The Black Cauldron and Treasure Planet were Disney's two most infamous animated flops and now Strange World joins them for committing the same cardinal sin as those movies: not making family-friendly products. A movie with a gay protagonist should be family-friendly and an in ideal world that would be the case, but we don't live in that world...yet. We may not live to see it in our lifetimes but the truth of the matter is that as of now, Disney needs to realize they're losing their core audience. And it's not just gay characters that's a factor, it's been a little bit of everything that's turning off middle-class Americans. I don't remember who posted it here pages back but the video with the Argentinian sports team that turned Disney into a punchline, referencing their recent trend of adding diversity for the sake of diversity even when it doesn't make sense, has alienated a lot of people too. It gets tiresome for Middle America to see it flaunted constantly in their face, being told if they don't approve then they're bigots. I think that type of reasoning only works to turn them into bigots by casting them out completely and making them feel as if they have no place.
 

TwilightZone

Well-Known Member
Yeah I'm with @Californian Elitist and @Disney Analyst on this one. Nobody had a problem with Robin Williams as Genie or Bob Saget as Danny Tanner.
Thinking about it more there's also Justin Timberlake who starred in trolls. Sure he did have a boy band past, but what I remember him from as someone who grew up in the 00s is creating some pretty raunchy songs (for the time period). In fact I think him stopping making those songs is what killed his career!
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
To me it just comes across as them doubling down. Like “look how progressive we are!” Like you said he’s not a well known actor. What’s the point? And yet the people at Disney made the decision to cast him. Which is why I said they need to do a little cleaning house because there seems to be no check and balances going on in there.

There's definitely a story there behind Burbank's casting of Jaboukie as Ethan Clade. I doubt we'll ever get that story in full, but you just know it's there. 🧐

I'm reminded of TDA's decision to hire Todrick Hall to do the music and choreography for Disneyland's new parade Magic Happens. There wasn't any other composer and choreographer you could hire in Southern California to do that work for a Disneyland parade? You had to hire a guy with multiple legal problems and financial troubles who also plays into drug culture and various illegal activities? For an afternoon parade at a theme park???

Baffling! Stay classy TDA!
 

TwilightZone

Well-Known Member
There's definitely a story there behind Burbank's casting of Jaboukie as Ethan Clade. I doubt we'll ever get that story in full, but you just know it's there. 🧐

I'm reminded of TDA's decision to hire Todrick Hall to do the music and choreography for Disneyland's new parade Magic Happens. There wasn't any other composer and choreographer you could hire in Southern California to do that work for a Disneyland parade? You had to hire a guy with multiple legal problems and financial troubles who also plays into drug culture and various illegal activities? For an afternoon parade at a theme park???

Baffling! Stay classy TDA!
Todrick also was in the masked singer which is (or was, I don't think it has much left to live for a variety of reasons) a pretty kid friendly show all things considered.

And I don't think all the negative press surrounding Todrick this year really put a dent in his career
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Or Paul Reuben's as Rex....

When Paul Reubens voiced Rex in 1986, he was known to most Americans for Pee-Wee's Big Adventure, a PG rated comedy film from 1985.

A year after Star Tours opened in January, 1987, Pee-Wee Herman had a big TV special called Pee-Wee's Christmas Special, a show that is still mandatory viewing in my house this time of year. Paul Reuben's legal problems came along many years after his 1980's fame and voice acting as Rex in Star Tours. After being the key word there. Years after.

And unlike Jaboukie's music video that would get me banned from this site for life, I can link Pee-Wee's hilarious opening musical number to his Christmas special here and wish everyone a very Merry Christmas! 😁🎅🎄



My God, that's just so good! Charo, for goshsakes! The (fake) Marines doing that choreography with their covers!

Jaboukie could learn a thing or two from Pee-Wee about subtlety and subversive messaging. 🤣
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
When Paul Reubens voiced Rex in 1986, he was known to most Americans for Pee-Wee's Big Adventure, a PG rated comedy film from 1985.

A year after Star Tours opened in January, 1987, Pee-Wee Herman had a big TV special called Pee-Wee's Christmas Special, a show that is still mandatory viewing in my house this time of year. Paul Reuben's legal problems came along many years after his 1980's fame and voice acting as Rex in Star Tours. After being the key word there. Years after.

And unlike Jaboukie's music video that would get me banned from this site for life, I can link Pee-Wee's hilarious opening musical number to his Christmas special here and wish everyone a very Merry Christmas! 😁🎅🎄



My God, that's just so good! Charo, for goshsakes!

Jaboukie could learn a thing or two from Pee-Wee about subtlety and subversive messaging. 🤣

The point was that Disney didn't distance itself from him even after his arrest for let us say "not kid friendly" theater activities or his recent arrest this summer related to inappropriate photos. His voice can still be heard at Disneyland today, and in the recent Star Wars Rebels show.

So whether before or after being hired Disney has a history of using talent that far from spotless.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
So whether before or after being hired Disney has a history of using talent that far from spotless.

If Paul Reubens had been arrested for sexual misconduct in 1985, do you think WDI would have hired him in 1986 to voice Rex in Star Tours? Cause I don't.

Although now, it wouldn't surprise me if some celeb was arrested for sexual misconduct or drug use in 2023 and then showed up voicing a new attraction at Disneyland in 2024, with plenty of fawning publicity to go with it.

Which is part of what is causing parents to re-think their automatic approval of Disney branded products and films.
 

Heppenheimer

Well-Known Member
In this case, I agree that audiences don't know this individual let alone who he was playing. I disagree that general audiences don't usually know who the actors who voice animated characters are because whenever there's a big celebrity, the studios go out of their way to make sure everyone knows who is voicing who. Like Rihanna in Home or The Rock in Moana. Obviously that wasn't the case here.

That being said, I don't think people are aware of how many concerned parents use Facebook to keep tabs on what content is safe for their children. If there really were reports of this actor's song circulating around on Facebook, you can bet that all the parent groups were warning each other. I haven't seen anything for this movie, but I saw a lot of parents freaking out over Turning Red and Lightyear for having questionable content. When I was in school, anytime there was a big-budget children's movie that could possibly taint "Christian values," the parents would all get together and warn our school board and administration and then our principal would take the time to warn us to not watch such-and-such movie. Word of mouth spreads especially in conservative circles.
Wow, I went to Catholic school my whole childhood and they never did this for any movie. Not even for The Last Temptation of Christ.
 

Heppenheimer

Well-Known Member
Keep in mind, there was a conservative backlash against the Hunchback of Notre Dame at the time — with Christians disliking how sexual Esmeralda was and feeling that Frollo painted Christians in a negative light. The release of Hunchback also coincided with backlash to Disney giving benefits to same-sex couples.

Of course, while not nearly as profitable as Aladdin or the Lion King, The Hunchback of Notre Dame did gross $325 million on a $100 million budget, and it was the fifth highest-grossing movie worldwide of 1996. Not comparable at all to Strange World's box office performance.
I really don't remember any backlash against Hunchback. The Disney version barely even deals with religion, unlike the novel, where Frollo is a cleric and religious hypocrisy is a major theme.
 

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
Yeah, he's gross, but I came to terms with the idea of separating the art from the artist (or one piece of art by the same artist from another) a long time ago. I have no problem watching The Cosby Show with my kids, or rewatching an old Chris Benoit wrestling match. Pretty much every celebrity is degenerate at best and abhorrent at worst so I need to sever some things in order to be at peace with consuming any pop culture whatsoever.
Exactly. One piece of work, a part-time job, essentially. Why should an actor have to change themselves for one Disney project?

As you said they’re all weirdos.
 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
If Paul Reubens had been arrested for sexual misconduct in 1985, do you think WDI would have hired him in 1986 to voice Rex in Star Tours? Cause I don't.
You comment on this comparison (involving an arrest for sexual misconduct) yet somehow missed the point of my earlier, and more relevant, reference to Demi Moore. There is something very, very puzzling about the spin you’re trying to put on this.
 

Heppenheimer

Well-Known Member
Someone from “Gen Z” knows who Haley Mills and Ann Miller were? That seems………..interesting……or something.
That's actually a relief. I'm sick of hearing the pop culture of yesterday dismissed by the current young generations because "that came out before I was born."

By contrast, a poll in my high school in the 90s had The Beatles as one of the 10 most popular bands (I don't remember their actual rank).
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
You comment on this comparison (involving an arrest for sexual misconduct) yet somehow missed the point of my earlier, and more relevant, reference to Demi Moore. There is something very, very puzzling about the spin you’re trying to put on this.

Let me Google Demi Moore and that timeline. I'm not familiar with it at all. She's always bugged me, to be honest.

I'll be back...
 

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
Also, this isn’t the 50s and 60s, although that period of time had their own problems that people love to either gloss over and/or romanticize.

Annette Funicello was charming and, in general, not very talented. She couldn’t sing, her acting was whatever, and she could hold an 8-count, albeit not always on beat. Beautiful and mediocre. Love her, but…
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
If Paul Reubens had been arrested for sexual misconduct in 1985, do you think WDI would have hired him in 1986 to voice Rex in Star Tours? Cause I don't.
Yes I do, and many other transgressions.

For example they hired Tim Allen, who was had a previous arrested for drug trafficking, to be not only be the lead of their family friendly show on ABC but also to go onto voice Buzz and play Santa.

Point is that over the years Disney has dealt with talent who were in past or were currently involved in non-kid friendly activities. It just seems that some talent was more tolerated by the public than others.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom